Статья 41Регламент № 1060/2009 Европейского парламента и Совета Европейского Союза

Настоящий Регламент вступает в силу на 20-й день после его публикации в Официальном Журнале Европейского Союза.

Он применяется со дня вступления в силу. Однако:

• Статья 4(1) применяется с 7 декабря 2010 г. и
• пункты (f), (g) и (h) Статьи 4(3) применяются с 7 июня 2011 г.

Настоящий Регламент является обязательным в полном объеме и имеет прямое действие во всех Государствах-членах ЕС.

Совершено в Страсбурге, 16 сентября 2009 г.

1. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно иметь правление либо совет директоров.

Его высшее руководство должно обеспечивать:

(a) независимость кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, в том числе, от любого политического и экономического влияния либо принуждения;

(b) надлежащее выявление конфликтов интересов, управление ими и обнародование информации о них;

(c) соблюдение кредитным рейтинговым агентством остальных требований настоящего Регламента.

2. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно быть организовано таким образом, чтобы коммерческий интерес не умалял независимость и достоверность кредитной рейтинговой деятельности.

Высшее руководство кредитного рейтингового агентства должно иметь хорошую репутацию, а также достаточные навыки и опыт для того, чтобы обеспечивать рациональное и благоразумное управление кредитным рейтинговым агентством.

Как минимум одна треть, но не менее двух членов правления или совета директоров кредитного рейтингового агентства должны быть независимыми членами, не участвующими в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности.

Вознаграждение независимых членов правления или совета директоров не должно быть связано с результатами деятельности кредитного рейтингового агентства и должно быть организовано таким образом, чтобы обеспечить независимость их суждений. Срок назначения независимых членов правления или совета директоров должен быть заранее согласован и не должен превышать пяти лет без возможности назначения на новый срок. Освобождение независимых членов правления или совета директоров от должности возможно исключительно в случаях неправомерного поведения либо невыполнения профессиональных обязанностей.

Большинство членов правления либо совета директоров, в том числе независимых членов, должны иметь достаточные специальные знания в области финансовых услуг. Если кредитное рейтинговое агентство выпускает кредитные рейтинги инструментов секьюритизации, как минимум, один независимый и один иной член правления или совета директоров должны иметь глубокие знания и опыт на уровне высшего руководства на рынках инструментов секьюритизации.

Помимо общей компетенции правления или совета директоров, их независимые члены также должны иметь особые полномочия по мониторингу:

(a) развития политики в области кредитных рейтингов и методологии, используемой кредитным рейтинговым агентством в своей кредитной рейтинговой деятельности;

(b) эффективности внутренней системы контроля качества кредитного рейтингового агентства в отношении кредитной рейтинговой деятельности;

(c) эффективности мер и процедур, установленных для обеспечения выявления, устранения конфликтов интересов либо управления ими, а также обнародования информации о них; и

(d) процессов контроля соблюдения правовых норм и управления, в том числе, эффективности осуществления функции пересмотра, описанной в пункте 9 настоящего Раздела.

Заключения независимых членов правления или совета директоров по вопросам, указанным в пунктах (a) - (d), должны периодически представляться на рассмотрение правления или совета директоров, а также должны быть доступны для рассмотрения ESMA при условии направления соответствующего запроса.

3. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно установить надлежащие предписания и процедуры для обеспечения соблюдения своих обязанностей в соответствии с настоящим Регламентом.

4. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно иметь надлежащие административные процедуры и порядок ведения бухгалтерской отчетности, механизмы внутреннего контроля, эффективный порядок оценки риска, а также эффективные контрольные и защитные меры для систем обработки информации.

Указанные механизмы внутреннего контроля должны быть предназначены для обеспечения соответствия решениям и установленному порядку на всех уровнях кредитного рейтингового агентства.

Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно установить и поддерживать процедуры принятия решений и организационные структуры, которые четко документально закрепляют порядок подчиненности и распределяют функции и обязанности.

5. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно учредить и поддерживать постоянный эффективный отдел по обеспечению нормативно-правового соответствия (нормативно-правовое соответствие), действующий независимо.

Отдел нормативно-правового соответствия должен контролировать выполнение кредитным рейтинговым агентством и его сотрудниками обязанностей кредитного рейтингового агентства в соответствии с настоящим Регламентом. Отдел нормативно-правового соответствия должен:

(a) контролировать и регулярно оценивать соразмерность и эффективность мер и процедур, принятых в соответствии с пунктом 3, и действий, предпринятых для противодействия невыполнению кредитным рейтинговым агентством своих обязанностей;

(b) консультировать руководство, рейтинговых аналитиков, сотрудников, а также иных физических лиц, оказывающих услуги кредитному рейтинговому агентству или подпадающих под его контроль, либо любых других лиц, прямо или косвенно связанных с ним посредством контроля и осуществляющих кредитную рейтинговую деятельность, а также содействовать им в выполнении их обязанностей в соответствии с настоящим Регламентом.

6. Чтобы обеспечить надлежащее и независимое выполнение своих функций отделом нормативно-правового соответствия, кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно обеспечить выполнение следующих условий:

(a) отдел нормативно-правового соответствия имеет необходимые полномочия, ресурсы, специальные знания и доступ ко всей необходимой информации;

(b) назначен специалист по внутреннему контролю, несущий ответственность за обеспечение нормативно-правового соответствия и за отчетность относительно такого соответствия согласно пункту 3;

(c) руководство, рейтинговые аналитики, сотрудники, а также иные физические лица, оказывающие услуги кредитному рейтинговому агентству или подпадающие под его контроль, либо любые другие лица, прямо или косвенно связанные с ним посредством контроля, участвующие в обеспечении нормативно-правового соответствия, не участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, которую они контролируют;

(d) вознаграждение специалиста по внутреннему контролю не связано с результатами деятельности кредитного рейтингового агентства и устанавливается таким образом, чтобы обеспечить независимость его или ее суждения.

Специалист по внутреннему контролю должен обеспечивать надлежащее выявление и устранение любых конфликтов интересов, связанных с лицами, оказывающими услуги отделу нормативно-правового соответствия.

Специалист по внутреннему контролю должен регулярно отчитываться о выполнении его или ее обязанностей высшему руководству и независимым членам правления либо совета директоров.

7. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно принять надлежащие эффективные организационные и административные меры для предотвращения, выявления, устранения конфликтов интересов, указанных в пункте 1 Раздела B, управления ими, а также для их обнародования. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно вести записи обо всех существенных угрозах независимости кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, в том числе, об угрозах нарушения правил о кредитных рейтинговых аналитиках, установленных Разделом C, а также о мерах защиты, предпринятых для устранения указанных угроз.

8. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно установить соответствующие системы и процедуры, а также привлечь необходимые ресурсы для обеспечения постоянства и регулярности своей кредитной рейтинговой деятельности.

9. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно создать отдел пересмотра, ответственный за периодический пересмотр методологии, моделей и ключевых рейтинговых предположений, таких как математические и корреляционные предположения, за пересмотр любых их существенных изменений и модификаций, а также за пересмотр уместности указанных методов, моделей и ключевых рейтинговых предположений при их использовании или предполагаемом использовании для оценки новых финансовых инструментов.

Указанный отдел пересмотра должен быть независим от подразделений, ответственных за осуществление кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, и должен отчитываться перед членами правления либо совета директоров, указанными в пункте 2 настоящего Раздела.

10. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно контролировать и оценивать соразмерность и эффективность своих систем, механизмов внутреннего контроля и предписаний, созданных в соответствии с настоящим Регламентом, и принимать соответствующие меры для устранения недостатков.

1. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно выявлять, устранять существующие или потенциальные конфликты интересов, которые могут повлиять на анализ и суждения его рейтинговых аналитиков, сотрудников или иных физических лиц, оказывающих услуги кредитному рейтинговому агентству или подпадающих под его контроль, непосредственно участвующих в составлении кредитных рейтингов, на лиц, одобряющих кредитные рейтинги и рейтинговые прогнозы, либо должно управлять ими, а также прямо или косвенно их обнародовать.

2. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно обнародовать наименования оцениваемых лиц либо связанных с ними третьих лиц, от которых оно получает более 5% своего годового дохода.

3. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство не должно выпускать кредитные рейтинги или рейтинговые прогнозы в любых указанных ниже обстоятельствах либо, применительно к уже выпущенным кредитным рейтингам или рейтинговым прогнозам, должно незамедлительно обнародовать информацию о возможном влиянии на кредитные рейтинги или рейтинговые прогнозы следующих обстоятельств:

(a) кредитное рейтинговое агентство либо лица, указанные в пункте 1, прямо или косвенно обладают финансовыми инструментами оцениваемого лица или связанных с ним третьих лиц либо имеют иной прямой или косвенный имущественный интерес в капитале указанных лиц, кроме паев в различных коллективных инвестиционных схемах, в том числе, в управляемых фондах, таких как пенсионные фонды или фонды страхования жизни;

(aa) акционер или член кредитного рейтингового агентства, имеющий 10% или более либо капитала, либо голосующих акций кредитного рейтингового агентства или находящийся иным способом в положении, позволяющем оказывать существенное влияние на деятельность кредитного рейтингового агентства, имеет 10% или более либо капитала, либо голосующих акций оцениваемого лица или связанного с ним третьего лица, или какой-либо другой интерес владения этого оцениваемого лица или связанного с ним третьего лица, кроме владений в диверсифицированных коллективных инвестиционных схемах и управляемых фондах, таких как пенсионные фонды или фонды страхования жизни, которые не ставят его в положение, позволяющее оказывать существенное влияние на деятельность схемы;

(b) кредитный рейтинг составлен в отношении оцениваемого лица, прямо или косвенно связанного с кредитным рейтинговым агентством посредством контроля либо через третье лицо;

(ba) кредитный рейтинг составлен в отношении оцениваемого лица или связанного с ним третьего лица, которое имеет 10% или более либо капитала, либо голосующих акций этого кредитного рейтингового агентства;

(c) лицо, указанное в пункте 1, является членом правления или совета директоров оцениваемого лица либо связанного с ним третьего лица; или

(ca) акционер или член кредитного рейтингового агентства, имеющий 10% или более либо капитала, либо голосующих акций этого кредитного рейтингового агентства или находящийся иным способом в положении, позволяющем оказывать существенное влияние на деятельность кредитного рейтингового агентства, является членом административного или надзорного органа оцениваемого лица или связанного с ним третьего лица;

(d) рейтинговый аналитик, принимавший участие в составлении кредитного рейтинга, либо лицо, утвердившее кредитный рейтинг, имеет связь с оцениваемым лицом или связанным с ним третьим лицом, которая может привести к конфликту интересов.

Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно также незамедлительно определить, существуют ли основания для переоценки или отзыва существующего кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза.

3a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство обнародует информацию о возможном влиянии на кредитные рейтинги или рейтинговые прогнозы следующих обстоятельств:

(a) акционер или член кредитного рейтингового агентства, имеющий 5% или более либо капитала, либо голосующих акций этого кредитного рейтингового агентства или находящийся иным способом в положении, позволяющем оказывать существенное влияние на деятельность кредитного рейтингового агентства, имеет 5% или более либо капитала, либо голосующих акций оцениваемого лица или связанного с ним третьего лица, или какой-либо другой интерес владения этого оцениваемого лица или третьего лица. Это не включает в себя владения в диверсифицированных коллективных инвестиционных схемах и управляемых фондах, таких как пенсионные фонды или фонды страхования жизни, которые не ставят его в положение, позволяющее оказывать существенное влияние на деятельность схемы;

(b) акционер или член кредитного рейтингового агентства, имеющий 5% или более либо капитала, либо голосующих акций этого кредитного рейтингового агентства или находящийся иным способом в положении, позволяющем оказывать существенное влияние на деятельность кредитного рейтингового агентства, является членом административного или надзорного органа оцениваемого лица или связанного с ним третьего лица.

3b. При условии, что информация известна или должна быть известна кредитному рейтинговому агентству, обязательства, указанные в пунктах 3(aa), (ba) и (ca) и в пункте 3a, также относятся к:

(a) непрямым акционерам, на которых распространяется Статья 10 Директивы 2004/109/ЕС; и

(b) компаниям, которые контролируют кредитное рейтинговое агентство или определяют условия его деятельности, прямо или косвенно, и на которые распространяется Статья 10 Директивы 2004/109/ЕС.

3c. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство обеспечивает, чтобы сборы, взимаемые с его клиентов за предоставление кредитного рейтинга и оказание вспомогательных услуг, не были дискриминационными и основывались на фактических затратах. Сборы, взимаемые за услуги составления кредитного рейтинга, не должны зависеть от уровня кредитного рейтинга, выпущенного кредитным рейтинговым агентством, или от какого-либо другого результата или вывода выполненной работы.

4. Ни кредитное рейтинговое агентство, ни лицо, владеющее прямо или косвенно не менее чем 5% либо капитала, либо голосующих акций кредитного рейтингового агентства или находящееся иным способом в положении, позволяющем оказывать существенное влияние на деятельность кредитного рейтингового агентства не должно оказывать консультационные услуги либо давать профессиональные советы оцениваемым лицам или связанным с ними третьим лицам относительно корпоративной либо юридической структуры, активов, ответственности или деятельности оцениваемого лица либо связанного с ним третьего лица.

Кредитное рейтинговое агентство вправе оказывать иные услуги, помимо составления кредитных рейтингов (вспомогательные услуги). Вспомогательные услуги не являются частью кредитной рейтинговой деятельности; они включают в себя прогнозы рыночной конъюнктуры, оценку экономических тенденций, анализ ценообразования и иной анализ общих данных, а также соответствующие услуги по распространению.

Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно убедиться в том, что оказание вспомогательных услуг не создает конфликта интересов с кредитной рейтинговой деятельностью, и должно обнародовать в окончательных отчетах о составленном рейтинге перечень вспомогательных услуг, оказанных оцениваемому лицу или иному связанному с ним третьему лицу.

5. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно убедиться в том, что рейтинговые аналитики или лица, утверждающие рейтинги, не делают предложений либо рекомендаций, как формально, так и неформально, относительно проекта инструментов секьюритизации, по которым кредитное рейтинговое агентство, предположительно, будет составлять кредитный рейтинг.

6. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно организовать свои каналы для отчетности и коммуникации таким образом, чтобы обеспечить независимость лиц, указанных в пункте 1, от этой иной деятельности кредитного рейтингового агентства, осуществляемой на коммерческой основе.

7. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно вести соответствующие записи и при необходимости журнал регистрации для своей кредитной рейтинговой деятельности. Указанные записи должны включать в себя:

(a) применительно к каждому решению по кредитному рейтингу и рейтинговому прогнозу, личность рейтинговых аналитиков, принимающих участие в составлении кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза, личность лиц, утвердивших кредитный рейтинг или рейтинговый прогноз, информацию относительно того, по чьей инициативе был составлен кредитный рейтинг, и дату, когда было совершено данное действие в отношении кредитного рейтинга;

(b) бухгалтерские записи относительно платежей, полученных от любых оцениваемых лиц или связанных с ними третьих лиц либо от любого пользователя рейтингов;

(c) бухгалтерские записи относительно каждого подписчика на кредитные рейтинги или вспомогательные услуги;

(d) записи, документально закрепляющие установленные процедуры и рейтинговые методологии, используемые кредитным рейтинговым агентством при составлении кредитных рейтингов и рейтинговых прогнозов;

(e) внутренние записи и файлы, в том числе, конфиденциальную информацию и рабочую документацию, используемую в качестве основы для принятия какого-либо решения по кредитному рейтингу и рейтинговому прогнозу;

(f) отчеты об анализе актива, отчеты об оценке актива, а также частные отчеты о кредитном рейтинге и внутренние записи, в том числе, конфиденциальную информацию и рабочую документацию, используемую в качестве основы для заключений, представленных в указанных отчетах;

(g) записи о процедурах и мерах, принятых кредитным рейтинговым агентством для выполнения требований настоящего Регламента; и

(h) копии внутренних и внешних сообщений, в том числе, электронных сообщений, полученных или отправленных кредитным рейтинговым агентством и его сотрудниками и связанных с кредитной рейтинговой деятельностью.

8. Записи и журналы регистрации, упомянутые в пункте 7, должны храниться у кредитного рейтингового агентства не менее пяти лет и по запросу предоставляться ESMA.

Если регистрация кредитного рейтингового агентства аннулирована, записи должны храниться в течение дополнительного срока продолжительностью не менее трех лет.

9. Записи, устанавливающие соответствующие права и обязанности кредитного рейтингового агентства и оцениваемого лица либо связанных с ним третьих лиц в соответствии с договором на оказание кредитных рейтинговых услуг, должны храниться как минимум в течение сотрудничества с указанным оцениваемым лицом или связанными с ним третьими лицами.

1. Рейтинговые аналитики, сотрудники кредитного рейтингового агентства, а также иные физические лица, оказывающие услуги кредитному рейтинговому агентству либо подпадающие под его контроль, которые непосредственно участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, и лица, тесно связанные с ними в значении Статьи 1(2) Директивы 2004/72/ЕС <*>, не должны покупать или продавать либо вступать в любые сделки в отношении любых финансовых инструментов, выпущенных, гарантированных либо иным образом поддерживаемых любым оцениваемым лицом в рамках их основной аналитической компетенции, кроме паев в различных коллективных инвестиционных схемах, в том числе, в управляемых фондах, таких как пенсионные фонды или фонды страхования жизни.

---

<*> Директива 2004/72/ЕС Европейской Комиссии от 29 апреля 2004 г., имплементирующая Директиву 2003/6/ЕС Европейского Парламента и Совета ЕС в отношении общепринятых обычаев делового оборота, определения инсайдерской информации применительно к производным финансовым инструментам на товары, в отношении составления перечней инсайдеров, уведомлений о сделках руководства и уведомлений о подозрительных сделках (ОЖ № L 162, 30.4.2004, стр. 70).

2. Лицо, указанное в пункте 1, не должно принимать участие в составлении кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза в отношении отдельного оцениваемого лица либо иным образом влиять на его составление, если такое лицо:

(a) имеет в собственности финансовые инструменты оцениваемого лица, кроме паев в различных коллективных инвестиционных схемах;

(b) имеет в собственности финансовые инструменты любого лица, связанного с оцениваемым лицом, если такое обладание может вызвать или обычно признается вызывающим конфликт интересов, кроме паев в различных коллективных инвестиционных схемах;

(c) недавно имело трудовые, деловые или иные отношения с оцениваемым лицом, способные вызвать или обычно признаваемые вызывающими конфликт интересов.

3. Кредитные рейтинговые агентства должны убедиться в том, что лица, указанные в пункте 1:

(a) предпринимают для защиты собственности и записей, имеющихся у кредитного рейтингового агентства, от мошенничества, кражи или ненадлежащего использования все разумные меры с учетом природы, масштабов и сложности их деятельности, а также природы и области их кредитной рейтинговой деятельности;

(b) никому не раскрывают информацию о кредитных рейтингах либо о возможных будущих кредитных рейтингах или рейтинговых прогнозах соответствующего кредитного рейтингового агентства, кроме оцениваемого лица или связанного с ним третьего лица;

(c) не делятся конфиденциальной информацией, доверенной кредитному рейтинговому агентству, с рейтинговыми аналитиками и сотрудниками любого лица, прямо либо косвенно связанного с ним посредством контроля, а также с любыми другими физическими лицами, оказывающими услуги любому лицу, прямо или косвенно связанному с агентством посредством контроля, либо подпадающими под контроль такого лица, которые непосредственно не участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности; и

(d) не используют и не распространяют конфиденциальную информацию в целях торговли финансовыми инструментами либо в любых других целях, кроме осуществления кредитной рейтинговой деятельности.

4. Лица, указанные в пункте 1, не должны вымогать или принимать деньги, подарки или услуги от любых лиц, с которыми кредитное рейтинговое агентство имеет деловые отношения.

5. Если лицо, указанное в пункте 1, считает, что любое другое из таких лиц ведет себя, по его мнению, неправомерно, он или она должны немедленно сообщить данную информацию специалисту по внутреннему контролю без негативных последствий для сообщившего.

6. Если рейтинговый аналитик расторгает трудовой договор с агентством и устраивается на работу в оцениваемое лицо, в составлении рейтингов для которого он или она участвовали, либо в финансовую организацию, с которой он или она имели деловые отношения в рамках своих обязанностей в кредитном рейтинговом агентстве, кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно пересмотреть соответствующие результаты работы указанного рейтингового аналитика за последние два года, предшествовавшие его увольнению.

7. Лицо, указанное в пункте 1, не должно занимать ключевую позицию в руководстве оцениваемого лица или связанного с ним третьего лица в течение шести месяцев с момента составления кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза.

8. Для целей Статьи 7(4):

(a) кредитные рейтинговые агентства должны убедиться в том, что ведущие рейтинговые аналитики не участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, связанной с одним и тем же оцениваемым лицом или связанными с ним третьими лицами более четырех лет подряд;

(b) другие кредитные рейтинговые агентства, кроме тех, которые назначены эмитентом или связанным с ним третьим лицом, и все кредитные рейтинговые агентства, выпускающие суверенные рейтинги, должны убедиться в том, что:

(i) рейтинговые аналитики не участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, связанной с одним и тем же оцениваемым лицом или связанными с ним третьими лицами более пяти лет подряд;

(ii) лица, одобряющие кредитные рейтинги, не участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, связанной с одним и тем же оцениваемым лицом или связанными с ним третьими лицами более семи лет подряд.

Лица, указанные в пунктах (a) и (b) первого подпараграфа, не должны участвовать в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, связанной с одним и тем же оцениваемым лицом или связанными с ним третьими лицами, указанными в рассматриваемых пунктах, в течение двух лет после окончания срока, установленного указанными пунктами.

---

<*> Часть пунктов статьи удалена актами, вносящими изменения — прим. перев.

1. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно убедиться в том, что кредитный рейтинг и рейтинговый прогноз содержит ясное и заметное указание на имя и должность ведущего рейтингового аналитика в соответствующей кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, а также имя и должность лица, непосредственно ответственного за одобрение кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза.

2. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно убедиться в том, что как минимум:

(a) указаны все значительные источники, включая оцениваемое лицо или, в соответствующих случаях, связанных с ним третьих лиц, использованные при подготовке кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза, вместе с указанием, был ли кредитный рейтинг или рейтинговый прогноз представлен данному оцениваемому лицу или связанным с ним третьим лицам и был ли он изменен после такого представления, но до своего выпуска;

(b) ясно указан основной метод или вариации метода, использованные при определении рейтинга, со ссылкой на их подробное описание; если кредитный рейтинг основан более чем на одном методе либо если ссылка только на основной метод может помешать инвесторам увидеть все важные аспекты кредитного рейтинга, включая любые значительные поправки и отклонения, кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно объяснить этот момент в кредитном рейтинге и указать, каким образом различные методы или другие аспекты приняты во внимание в кредитном рейтинге;

(c) имеется объяснение значения каждой рейтинговой категории, определение неплатежа или восстановления и любого соответствующего предупреждения о риске, включая анализ чувствительности соответствующих ключевых рейтинговых предположений, таких как математические и корреляционные предположения, с указанием наихудшего и наилучшего сценария кредитного рейтинга;

(d) ясно и заметно указана дата, когда кредитный рейтинг был впервые выпущен для распространения, а также когда он в последний раз был обновлен, включая все рейтинговые прогнозы; и

(e) указана информация о том, затрагивает ли кредитный рейтинг недавно выпущенный финансовый инструмент, и оценивает ли кредитное рейтинговое агентство данный финансовый инструмент впервые;

(f) для рейтингового прогноза предоставлен временной интервал, во время которого ожидается внесение изменений в кредитный рейтинг.

При публикации кредитных рейтингов или рейтинговых прогнозов кредитные рейтинговые агентства включают ссылку на историческую информацию о просроченных платежах, опубликованную ESMA в центральном банке данных в соответствии со Статьей 11(2), вместе с объяснением значения этих просроченных платежей.

2a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство сопровождает обнародование рейтинговых методологий, моделей и ключевых рейтинговых предположений руководством, которое разъясняет предположения, параметры, пределы и сомнения, окружающие модели и рейтинговые методологии, используемые в кредитных рейтингах, в том числе моделирование стрессовых сценариев, выполненное кредитным рейтинговым агентством при составлении кредитных рейтингов, кредитной рейтинговой информации по анализу потока наличных средств, выполненных им или на которых оно основывалось, и, если имеется, указание на ожидаемые изменения кредитного рейтинга. Это руководство должно быть ясным и легко понятным.

3. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно проинформировать оцениваемое лицо в рабочие часы оцениваемого лица и как минимум за полный рабочий день до публикации кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза. Эта информация включает в себя основные принципы, на которых основан кредитный рейтинг или рейтинговый прогноз, для того чтобы дать возможность оцениваемому лицу указать кредитному рейтинговому агентству на какие-либо фактические ошибки.

4. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство при обнародовании кредитных рейтингов или рейтинговых прогнозов должно явно и заметно указать на любые свойства и ограничения кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза. В частности, кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно явно указать при обнародовании кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза, считает ли оно удовлетворительным качество информации, доступной в отношении оцениваемого лица, и насколько оно проверило информацию, предоставленную ему оцениваемым лицом либо связанными с ним третьими лицами. Если кредитный рейтинг или рейтинговый прогноз составляется в отношении такого типа лица или финансового инструмента, исторические данные по которому ограничены, кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно явно указать на видном месте данные ограничения.

В случае если нехватка надежной информации или сложность структуры нового типа финансового инструмента или неудовлетворительное качество доступной информации поднимает вопрос о достоверности кредитного рейтинга, составленного кредитным рейтинговым агентством, кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно воздержаться от выпуска кредитного рейтинга либо отозвать существующий кредитный рейтинг.

5. При анонсировании кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно объяснить в своих пресс-релизах или отчетах ключевые элементы, лежащие в основе кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза.

Если информация, указанная в пунктах 1, 2 и 4, была бы непропорциональна длине распространяемого отчета, достаточно сделать явную и заметную ссылку в самом отчете на место, где указанная информация может быть непосредственно и легко доступна, в том числе, это может быть ссылка на соответствующую информацию на веб-сайте кредитного рейтингового агентства.

6. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство обнародует на своем веб-сайте и сообщает ESMA на непрерывной основе информацию обо всех лицах или долговых инструментах, представленных ему для его первоначального прогноза или для предварительного рейтинга. Это раскрытие информации должно произойти независимо от того, обратится ли эмитент в кредитное рейтинговое агентство за окончательным рейтингом.

1. Если кредитное рейтинговое агентство оценивает инструмент секьюритизации, оно должно включить в кредитный рейтинг всю информацию об убытках, а также анализ денежного потока, который оно провело или на котором основывалось, а также указание на любые ожидаемые изменения в кредитном рейтинге.

2. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно указать, на каком уровне оно произвело оценку процессов комплексной проверки экономической деятельности (due diligence), осуществляемых на уровне рассматриваемых финансовых инструментов и других активов инструментов секьюритизации. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно указать, проводило ли оно такую оценку самостоятельно либо полагалось на оценку третьей стороны, с указанием на то, каким образом результат такой оценки влияет на кредитный рейтинг.

1. Если кредитное рейтинговое агентство выпускает суверенный рейтинг или связанный с ним рейтинговый прогноз, оно одновременно представляет подробный отчет об исследовании, разъясняющий все предположения, параметры, пределы и сомнения и всю другую информацию, учтенную при определении этого суверенного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза. Этот отчет должен быть доступным населению, ясным и легко понятным.

2. Обнародованный отчет об исследовании, сопровождающийся изменением по сравнению с предыдущим суверенным рейтингом или связанным с ним рейтинговым прогнозом, должен включать в себя, по крайней мере, следующее:

(a) подробную оценку изменений количественного предположения, обосновывающую причины изменения рейтинга и их относительный вес. Подробная оценка должна включать в себя описание следующего: среднедушевой доход, рост ВВП, инфляцию, финансовый баланс, внешний баланс, внешний долг, индикатор экономического развития и индикатор дефолта, и все другие существенные факторы, принятые во внимание. Она должна быть дополнена относительным весом каждого фактора;

(b) подробную оценку изменений качественного предположения, обосновывающую причины изменения рейтинга и их относительный вес;

(c) подробное описание рисков, пределов и сомнений, относящихся к изменению рейтинга; и

(d) обзор протоколов встреч рейтингового комитета, на которых принято решение об изменении рейтинга.

3. Без ущерба действию пункта 3 Части I Раздела D Приложения I, если кредитное рейтинговое агентство выпускает суверенные рейтинги или связанные с ними рейтинговые прогнозы, оно публикует их в соответствии со Статьей 8a после окончания рабочих часов регулируемых рынков и, по крайней мере, за один час до их начала.

4. Без ущерба действию пункта 5 Части I Раздела D Приложения I, в соответствии с которым при объявлении кредитного рейтинга кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно разъяснить в своих пресс-релизах или отчетах ключевые элементы, лежащие в основе кредитного рейтинга, и хотя национальная политика может служить элементом, лежащим в основе суверенного рейтинга, рекомендации о политике, предписания и руководства оцениваемым лицам, в том числе государствам, или региональным, или местным органам государств, не должны быть частью суверенных рейтингов или рейтинговых прогнозов.

Кредитное рейтинговое агентство в общем порядке должно обнародовать факт своей регистрации в соответствии с настоящим Регламентом, а также следующую информацию:

1. о любых существующих и возможных конфликтах интересов, указанных в пункте 1 Раздела B;

2. перечень своих вспомогательных услуг;

3. правила кредитного рейтингового агентства относительно публикации кредитных рейтингов и других связанных с ними сообщений, в том числе рейтинговых прогнозов;

4. об общих принципах организации получения вознаграждения;

5. методы и описания моделей и ключевых рейтинговых предположений, таких как математические и корреляционные предположения, используемых в его кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, а также их существенные изменения;

6. о любых существенных изменениях его систем, ресурсов или процедур; и

7. в соответствующих случаях, свой кодекс деловой этики.

Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно периодически обнародовать следующую информацию:

1. каждые шесть месяцев исторические данные о просроченных платежах по его рейтинговым категориям с указанием различий по основным географическим зонам деятельности эмитентов и изменений таких данных с течением времени;

2. ежегодно следующую информацию:

(a) перечень сборов, взимаемых с каждого клиента за индивидуальные кредитные рейтинги и вспомогательные услуги;

(aa) политику ценообразования, в том числе структуру сборов и критерии ценообразования в отношении кредитных рейтингов для различных классов активов;

(b) перечень тех клиентов кредитного рейтингового агентства, темпы роста приносимого дохода кредитному рейтинговому агентству которыми в предыдущем финансовом году превысили темпы роста общего дохода кредитного рейтингового агентства в рассматриваемом году более чем в 1,5 раза. Любой из таких клиентов должен быть включен в перечень только в том случае, если в рассматриваемом году он на мировом уровне принес более 0,25% общемирового дохода кредитному рейтинговому агентству;

и

(c) перечень кредитных рейтингов, выпущенных в соответствующем году, с указанием доли кредитных рейтингов, составленные по собственной инициативе.

Для целей настоящего пункта под термином «клиент» имеется в виду лицо, его дочерние организации, а также ассоциированные лица, доля в которых у соответствующего лица превышает 20%, а также любые другие лица, в отношении которых оно вело переговоры о реструктуризации долговых обязательств, выпущенных от имени клиента, если вознаграждение было прямо или косвенно выплачено кредитному рейтинговому агентству за составление рейтинга указанного долгового обязательства.

Кредитное рейтинговое агентство должно ежегодно обнародовать следующую информацию:

1. подробную информацию об организационно-правовой структуре и собственности кредитного рейтингового агентства, в том числе, информацию об имуществе в значении Статей 9 и 10 Директивы 2004/109/ЕС Европейского Парламента и Совета ЕС от 15 декабря 2004 г. о гармонизации требований к прозрачности применительно к информации об эмитентах, чьи ценные бумаги допущены к торгам на регулируемом рынке <*>;

---

<*> ОЖ № L 390, 31.12.2004, стр. 38.

2. описание механизмов внутреннего контроля, обеспечивающих качество его кредитной рейтинговой деятельности;

3. статистику распределения сотрудников на новые кредитные рейтинги, пересмотры кредитных рейтингов, разработку методологии или моделей и высшее руководство, а также распределения сотрудников на рейтинговую деятельность в отношении различных классов активов (корпоративных — структурированных финансовых — суверенных);

4. описание правил делопроизводства;

5. результаты ежегодной внутренней проверки независимым отделом нормативно-правового соответствия;

6. описание управления и правил ротации рейтинговых аналитиков;

7. финансовую информацию о доходах кредитного рейтингового агентства, в том числе общий оборот, разделенную на информацию о доходах от кредитной рейтинговой деятельности и о доходах от вспомогательной деятельности с подробным описанием каждой категории, в том числе доходы, полученные от вспомогательных услуг, предоставленных клиентам кредитных рейтинговых услуг и распределение сборов по кредитным рейтингам для различных классов активов. Информация об общем обороте также включает в себя географическое распределение этого оборота по доходам, полученным в Союзе и доходам, полученным во всем мире;

8. положение об управлении в значении Статьи 46a(1) Директивы 78/660/ЕЭС Совета ЕС от 25 июля 1978 г. о ежегодной отчетности некоторых типов компаний <*>. Для целей указанного положения информация, указанная в Статье 46a(1)(d) указанной Директивы, должна предоставляться кредитным рейтинговым агентством независимо от того, подпадает ли оно под действие Директивы 2004/25/ЕС Европейского Парламента и Совета ЕС от 21 апреля 2004 г. о предложениях о поглощении <**>.

---

<*> ОЖ № L 222, 14.8.1978, стр. 11.

<**> ОЖ № L 142, 30.4.2004, стр. 12.

1. Полное наименование кредитного рейтингового агентства, место нахождения в Союзе

2. Имя и контактная информация контактного лица и специалиста по внутреннему контролю

3. Правовой статус

4. Класс кредитных рейтингов для составления которых кредитное рейтинговое агентство хочет быть зарегистрировано

5. Структура собственности

6. Организационная структура и корпоративное управление

7. Финансовые ресурсы для осуществления кредитной рейтинговой деятельности

8. Подбор сотрудников в кредитное рейтинговое агентство и их специальные знания

9. Информация относительно дочерних организаций кредитного рейтингового агентства

10. Описание процедур и методов, используемых для выпуска и пересмотра кредитных рейтингов

11. Правила и процедуры выявления конфликтов интересов, управления ими и их обнародования

12. Информация относительно рейтинговых аналитиков

13. Организация получения вознаграждения и оценки результатов деятельности

14. Услуги, помимо кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, которые планирует оказывать кредитное рейтинговое агентство

15. Программа деятельности, включая указание на предполагаемое место осуществления основной деятельности, планируемое учреждение филиалов и представительств, установление предполагаемого типа деятельности

16. Документация и подробная информация относительно предполагаемого использования режима одобрения

17. Документация и подробная информация относительно предполагаемого привлечения внешних исполнителей, включая информацию о лицах, принимающих на себя обязанности внешних исполнителей.

1. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 4(3) путем одобрения кредитного рейтинга, выпущенного в третьей стране, без соблюдения условий, установленных в указанном параграфе, за исключением случаев, когда причины указанного нарушения находятся вне пределов знаний и контроля соответствующего кредитного рейтингового агентства.

2. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает второй подпараграф Статьи 4(4), используя одобрение кредитного рейтинга, выпущенного в третьей стране, с намерением избежать соблюдения требований настоящего Регламента.

3. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 1 Раздела A Приложения I, не назначая правление или совет директоров.

4. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с первым параграфом пункта 2 Раздела A Приложения I, не обеспечивая независимость своей кредитной рейтинговой деятельности от коммерческих интересов.

5. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности со вторым параграфом пункта 2 Раздела A Приложения I, путем назначения на высшие руководящие должности лиц, не обладающих хорошей репутацией, а также достаточными навыками и опытом для того, чтобы обеспечивать рациональное и благоразумное управление кредитным рейтинговым агентством.

6. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с третьим параграфом пункта 2 Раздела A Приложения I, не назначая необходимое количество независимых членов правления или совета директоров.

7. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с четвертым параграфом пункта 2 Раздела A Приложения I, устанавливая систему вознаграждения независимых членов правления или совета директоров, связанную с результатами деятельности кредитного рейтингового агентства и должно быть организовано таким образом, чтобы обеспечить независимость их суждений; или устанавливая срок полномочий независимых членов правления или совета директоров более пяти лет или возобновляемый срок полномочий; или путем освобождения независимых членов правления или совета директоров от должности по иным причинам, кроме неправомерного поведения либо невыполнения профессиональных обязанностей.

8. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пятым параграфом пункта 2 Раздела A Приложения I, назначая на должность членов правления или совета директоров, не имеющих достаточных специальных знаний в области финансовых услуг; либо если кредитное рейтинговое агентство выпускает кредитные рейтинги инструментов секьюритизации, не назначив как минимум одного независимого и одного иного члена правления или совета директоров, которые имеют глубокие знания и опыт на уровне высшего руководства на рынках инструментов секьюритизации.

9. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с шестым параграфом пункта 2 Раздела A Приложения I, не обеспечивая мониторинг независимыми членами правления или совета директоров вопросов, указанных в шестом параграфе указанного пункта.

10. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с седьмым параграфом пункта 2 Раздела A Приложения I, не обеспечивая периодическое представление независимыми членами правления или совета директоров их заключений по вопросам, указанным в шестом параграфе указанного пункта, правлению или совету директоров соответственно либо не обеспечивая представление указанных заключений ESMA по соответствующему запросу.

11. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 3 Раздела A Приложения I, не устанавливая надлежащие предписания и процедуры для обеспечения соблюдения своих обязанностей в соответствии с настоящим Регламентом.

12. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 4 Раздела A Приложения I, не устанавливая надлежащие административные процедуры и порядок ведения бухгалтерской отчетности, механизмы внутреннего контроля, эффективный порядок оценки риска, а также эффективные контрольные и защитные меры для систем обработки информации; либо не устанавливая и не поддерживая процедуры принятия решений и организационные структуры согласно требованиям указанного пункта.

13. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 5 Раздела A Приложения I, не учреждая и не поддерживая постоянный эффективный независимый отдел по обеспечению нормативно-правового соответствия (нормативно-правовое соответствие).

14. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с параграфом 1 пункта 6 Раздела A Приложения I, не обеспечивая соблюдение условий для надлежащего и независимого выполнения своих функций отделом нормативно-правового соответствия, установленных первым параграфом указанного пункта.

15. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 7 Раздела A Приложения I, не принимая надлежащие эффективные организационные и административные меры для предотвращения, выявления, устранения конфликтов интересов, указанных в пункте 1 Раздела B Приложения I, управления ими, а также для их обнародования, либо не организовав ведение записей обо всех существенных угрозах независимости кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, в том числе об угрозах нарушения правил о кредитных рейтинговых аналитиках, установленных Разделом C Приложения I, а также о мерах защиты, предпринятых для устранения указанных угроз.

16. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 8 Раздела A Приложения I, не устанавливая соответствующие системы и процедуры, а также не привлекая необходимые ресурсы для обеспечения постоянства и регулярности своей кредитной рейтинговой деятельности.

17. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 9 Раздела A Приложения I, не учреждая отдел пересмотра, который:

(a) был бы ответственен за периодический пересмотр методологии, моделей и ключевых рейтинговых предположений или любых их существенных изменений и модификаций, а также за пересмотр уместности указанных методов, моделей и ключевых рейтинговых предположений при их использовании или предполагаемом использовании для оценки новых финансовых инструментов;

(b) был бы независим от подразделений, ответственных за осуществление кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, и

(c) отчитывался бы перед членами правления либо совета директоров.

18. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 10 Раздела A Приложения I, не контролируя или не оценивая соразмерность и эффективность своих систем, механизмов внутреннего контроля и предписаний, созданных в соответствии с настоящим Регламентом, либо не принимая соответствующие меры для устранения недостатков.

19. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 1 Раздела B Приложения I, не выявляя, не устраняя любые существующие или потенциальные конфликты интересов, которые могут повлиять на анализ и суждения его рейтинговых аналитиков, сотрудников или иных физических лиц, оказывающих услуги кредитному рейтинговому агентству или подпадающих под его контроль, непосредственно участвующих в составлении кредитных рейтингов, или на лиц, одобряющих кредитные рейтинги и рейтинговые прогнозы, либо не управляя такими конфликтами интересов или не раскрывая их ясно и понятно.

20. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с первым параграфом пункта 3 Раздела B Приложения I, выпуская кредитный рейтинг или рейтинговый прогноз при наличии любых обстоятельств, указанных в первом параграфе указанного пункта, или, в случае уже существующего кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза, не раскрывая немедленно информацию о том, что на такой кредитный рейтинг или рейтинговый прогноз потенциально могут повлиять указанные обстоятельства.

20a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 3a Раздела B Приложения I, не обнародуя тот факт, что на существующий кредитный рейтинг или рейтинговый прогноз потенциально может повлиять какое-либо из обстоятельств, установленных в пунктах (a) и (b) этого пункта.

21. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности со вторым параграфом пункта 3 Раздела B Приложения I, не определяя незамедлительно, существуют ли основания для переоценки или отзыва существующего кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза.

22. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с первым параграфом пункта 4 Раздела B Приложения I, если оцениваемые лица, в которых само кредитное рейтинговое агентство или любое лицо, имеющее, прямо или косвенно, не менее 5% либо капитала, либо голосующих акций, или находящееся каким-либо иным способом в положении, позволяющем оказывать существенное влияние на деятельность кредитного рейтингового агентства, оказывают консультационные услуги либо дают профессиональные советы этому оцениваемому лицу или связанному с ним третьему лицу относительно корпоративной либо юридической структуры, активов, ответственности или деятельности этого оцениваемого лица либо связанного с ним третьего лица.

22a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6a(1), если один из его акционеров или членов, имеющих не менее 5% капитала или голосующих акций в этом кредитном рейтинговом агентстве или в компании, которая имеет полномочия по осуществлению контроля или определению условий деятельности на это кредитное рейтинговое агентство, нарушает один из запретов, установленных в пунктах (a) - (e) этого параграфа, за исключением тех, которые установлены в пункте (a) для владений в диверсифицированных коллективных инвестиционных схемах, в том числе управляемых фондах, таких как пенсионные фонды или фонды страхования жизни, при условии, что владения в этих схемах не ставят акционера или члена кредитного рейтингового агентства в положение, позволяющее оказывать существенное влияние на деятельность этих схем.

23. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с первой частью третьего параграфа пункта 4 Раздела B Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что оказание вспомогательных услуг не создает конфликта интересов с его кредитной рейтинговой деятельностью.

24. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 5 Раздела B Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что рейтинговые аналитики или лица, утверждающие рейтинги, не делают предложений либо рекомендаций относительно проекта инструментов секьюритизации, по которым кредитное рейтинговое агентство, предположительно, будет составлять кредитный рейтинг.

25. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 6 Раздела B Приложения I, не организуя свои каналы для отчетности и коммуникации таким образом, чтобы обеспечить независимость лиц, указанных в пункте 1 Раздела B, от иной деятельности кредитного рейтингового агентства, осуществляемой на коммерческой основе.

26. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности со вторым параграфом пункта 8 Раздела B Приложения I, не сохраняя записи не менее трех лет после аннулирования его регистрации.

26a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство, которое вступило в договор на выпуск кредитных рейтингов по ресекьюритизации, нарушает Статью 6b(1), выпуская кредитные рейтинги по новым ресекьюритизациям, с лежащими в основе активами от того же инициатора более четырех лет подряд.

26b. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство, которое вступило в договор на выпуск кредитных рейтингов по ресекьюритизации, нарушает Статью 6b(3), вступив в новый договор на выпуск кредитных рейтингов по ресекьюритизации, с лежащими в основе активами от того же инициатора за период, равный по продолжительности истекшему договору, указанному в параграфах 1 и 2 Статьи 6b, но не превышая четырех лет.

27. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(1), не убеждаясь в том, что рейтинговые аналитики, сотрудники и любые другие физические лица, оказывающие услуги кредитному рейтинговому агентству или подпадающие под его контроль, которые прямо или косвенно участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, имеют уровень знаний и опыта, необходимый для выполнения порученных им задач.

28. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(2), не убеждаясь в том, что лица, указанные в параграфе 1, не инициируют переговоры и не принимают участие в переговорах относительно вознаграждения или иных платежей от оцениваемого лица, связанных с ним третьих лиц либо от любого иного лица, прямо или косвенно связанного с оцениваемым лицом посредством контроля.

29. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(3) в совокупности с пунктом 3(a) Раздела C Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что лица, указанные в пункте 1 указанного Раздела предпринимают для защиты собственности и записей, имеющихся у кредитного рейтингового агентства, от мошенничества, кражи или ненадлежащего использования все разумные меры с учетом природы, масштабов и сложности их деятельности, а также природы и области их кредитной рейтинговой деятельности.

30. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(3) в совокупности с пунктом 5 Раздела C Приложения I, налагая негативные последствия на лицо, указанное в пункте 1 указанного Раздела, сообщившее специалисту по внутреннему контролю информацию о том, что другое лицо в значении пункта 1 указанного Раздела ведет себя неправомерно, по мнению сообщившего.

31. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(3) в совокупности с пунктом 6 Раздела C Приложения I, не пересматривая результаты работы рейтингового аналитика за два года, предшествующие его увольнению, если рейтинговый аналитик расторгает трудовой договор с агентством и устраивается на работу в оцениваемое лицо, в составлении рейтингов для которого он или она участвовали, либо в финансовую организацию, с которой он или она имели деловые отношения в рамках своих обязанностей в кредитном рейтинговом агентстве.

32. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(3) в совокупности с пунктом 1 Раздела C Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что лицо, указанное в данном пункте, не покупает, не продает и не вступает в любые сделки в отношении любых финансовых инструментов, указанных в данном пункте.

33. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(3) в совокупности с пунктом 2 Раздела C Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что лицо, указанное в пункте 1 указанного Раздела, не принимает участие в составлении кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза, указанного в пункте 2 данного Раздела, и иным образом не влияет на его составление.

34. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(3) в совокупности с подпунктами (b), (c) и (d) пункта 3 Раздела C Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что лицо, указанное в пункте 1 указанного Раздела, не раскрывает, не использует информацию, указанную в названных подпунктах, а также не делится ею.

35. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(3) в совокупности с пунктом 4 Раздела C Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что лицо, указанное в пункте 1 указанного Раздела, не вымогает и не принимает деньги, подарки или услуги от любых лиц, с которыми кредитное рейтинговое агентство имеет деловые отношения.

36. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(3) в совокупности с пунктом 7 Раздела C Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что лицо, указанное в пункте 1 указанного Раздела, не занимает ключевую позицию в руководстве оцениваемого лица или связанного с ним третьего лица в течение шести месяцев с момента составления кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза.

37. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(4) в совокупности с пунктом (a) первого параграфа пункта 8 Раздела C Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что ведущие рейтинговые аналитики не участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, связанной с одним и тем же оцениваемым лицом или связанными с ним третьими лицами, более четырех лет подряд.

38. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(4) в совокупности с пунктом (i) пункта (b) первого параграфа пункта 8 Раздела C Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что при составлении добровольных кредитных рейтингов или суверенных рейтингов рейтинговые аналитики не участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, связанной с одним и тем же оцениваемым лицом или связанными с ним третьими лицами, более пяти лет подряд.

39. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(4) в совокупности с пунктом (ii) пункта (b) первого параграфа пункта 8 Раздела C Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что при составлении добровольных кредитных рейтингов или суверенных рейтингов лица, одобряющие кредитные рейтинги, не участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, связанной с одним и тем же оцениваемым лицом или связанными с ним третьими лицами, более семи лет подряд.

40. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(4) в совокупности со вторым параграфом пункта 8 Раздела C Приложения I, не убеждаясь в том, что лица, указанные в пунктах (a) и (b) первого параграфа указанного пункта, не участвуют в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, связанной с одним и тем же оцениваемым лицом или связанными с ним третьими лицами, указанными в рассматриваемых пунктах, в течение двух лет после окончания срока, установленного указанными пунктами.

41. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 7(5) путем расчета компенсаций или оценки деятельности в зависимости от дохода, получаемого кредитным рейтинговым агентством от оцениваемых лиц или зависящих от них третьих лиц.

42. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 8(2), не принимая, не имплементируя или не приводя в жизнь меры, необходимые для обеспечения обоснования кредитных рейтингов и кредитных прогнозов, которые оно выпускает, всесторонним анализом всей доступной ему информации, имеющей значение для анализа согласно используемой им рейтинговой методологии.

42a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 8(2), используя информацию, находящуюся за пределами действия Статьи 8(2).

42b. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 8(2a), выпуская изменения кредитных рейтингов, которые не соответствуют их опубликованным рейтинговым методологиям.

43. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 8(3), не используя при составлении рейтингов методологию, которая является строгой, системной, непрерывной и поддающейся проверке на основе исторического опыта, в том числе, бэк-тестинга.

44. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает первый подпараграф Статьи 8(4), отказывая в составлении кредитного рейтинга для лица или финансового инструмента на том основании, что часть лица или финансового инструмента была ранее оценена другим кредитным рейтинговым агентством.

45. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает второй подпараграф Статьи 8(4), не документируя все случаи, когда в процессе составления кредитного рейтинга оно отступает от существующего кредитного рейтинга, подготовленного другим кредитным рейтинговым агентством применительно к соответствующим активам либо инструментам секьюритизации, с указанием обоснования различий в оценках.

46. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает первое предложение Статьи 8(5), не отслеживая свои кредитные рейтинги, кроме суверенных рейтингов, либо не пересматривая свои другие кредитные рейтинги, кроме суверенных рейтингов, или рейтинговую методологию постоянно или, как минимум, один раз в год.

46a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает второй подпараграф Статьи 8(5) в совокупности с первым предложением первого подпараграфа Статьи 8(5), не отслеживая свои суверенные рейтинги, либо не пересматривая свои суверенные рейтинги постоянно или, как минимум, каждые шесть месяцев.

47. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает второе предложение Статьи 8(5), не устанавливая внутренний порядок отслеживания влияния изменения условий на макроэкономическом и финансовом рынках на кредитные рейтинги.

48. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт (b) Статьи 8(6), не пересматривая затронутые кредитные рейтинги в соответствии с указанным пунктом либо не сохраняя их под наблюдением до пересмотра в тех случаях, когда меняются используемые в кредитном рейтинговом агентстве методы, модели или ключевые рейтинговые предположения.

49. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт (c) Статьи 8(6), не переоценивая все кредитные рейтинги, которые были основаны на изменившихся методах, моделях или ключевых рейтинговых предположениях, если в результате пересмотра было установлено, что общий комбинированный эффект указанных изменений влияет на рассматриваемые кредитные рейтинги.

49a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт (c) Статьи 8(6) в совокупности с пунктом (c) Статьи 8(7), не проводя повторный кредитный рейтинг, если ошибки в рейтинговых методологиях или при их применении влияют на этот кредитный рейтинг.

50. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 9, привлекая внешних исполнителей для осуществления важных задач таким образом, что это приводит к существенному снижению качества внутреннего контроля кредитного рейтингового агентства и понижению возможности ESMA контролировать соответствие кредитного рейтингового агентства положениям настоящего Регламента.

51. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 10(2) в совокупности со вторым параграфом пункта 4 Части I Раздела D Приложения I, выпуская или не отзывая существующий кредитный рейтинг в случае, если нехватка надежной информации или сложность структуры нового типа финансового инструмента или неудовлетворительное качество доступной информации поднимают вопрос о достоверности кредитного рейтинга, составленного кредитным рейтинговым агентством.

52. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 10(6), используя наименование ESMA или иного уполномоченного органа таким образом, что это указывает на или подразумевает одобрение ESMA или любым уполномоченным органом кредитных рейтингов или кредитной рейтинговой деятельности кредитного рейтингового агентства.

53. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 13, взимая плату за доступ к информации, предоставленной в соответствии со Статьями 8 - 12.

54. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство, являющееся юридическим лицом, учрежденным на территории Союза, нарушает Статью 14(1), не подавая заявление на регистрацию для целей Статьи 2(1).

55. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 8a(3), не публикуя на своем веб-сайте или не предоставляя ESMA ежегодно, в соответствии с пунктом 3 Части III Раздела D Приложения I, календарь в конце декабря на следующие 12 месяцев, устанавливающий максимально три даты, которые попадают на пятницу, для публикации добровольных суверенных рейтингов, и связанных с ними рейтинговых прогнозов и устанавливающий даты, которые попадают на пятницу, для публикации запрашиваемых суверенных рейтингов и связанных с ними рейтинговых прогнозов.

56. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 8a(4), отклоняясь от объявленного календаря, если это не является необходимым для выполнения обязательств согласно Статье 8(2), Статье 10(1) или Статье 11(1), или не предоставляя подробное объяснение причин отклонения от объявленного календаря.

57. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 10(2) в совокупности с пунктом 3 Части III Раздела D Приложения I, публикуя суверенный рейтинг или связанный с ним рейтинговый прогноз во время рабочих часов регулируемых рынков или менее чем за один час до их открытия.

58. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 10(2) в совокупности с пунктом 4 Части III Раздела D Приложения I, включая рекомендации по политике, предписания или руководства для оцениваемых лиц, в том числе государств или региональных или местных органов государств, как часть суверенного рейтинга или связанного с ним рейтингового прогноза.

59. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 8a(2), основывая свои публичные сообщения, относящиеся к изменениям суверенных рейтингов, и которые не являются кредитными рейтингами, рейтинговыми прогнозами или сопровождающими пресс-релизами, указанными в пункте 5 Части I Раздела D Приложения I, на информации, находящейся в сфере оцениваемого лица, если эта информация была раскрыта без согласования оцениваемого лица, если ее нет в общедоступных источниках, или если существуют законные причины для оцениваемого лица не давать своего согласия на раскрытие информации.

60. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 8a(1), не выпуская индивидуальные общедоступные отчеты по странам при объявлении ревизии данной группы стран.

61. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт 1 Части III Раздела D Приложения I, выпуская суверенный рейтинг, или связанный с ним рейтинговый прогноз, без одновременного предоставления подробного отчета об исследовании, разъясняющего предположения, параметры, пределы и сомнения и всю другую информацию, учитываемую при определении этого суверенного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза, либо не делая этот отчет общедоступным, ясным и легко понятным.

62. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт 2 Части III Раздела D Приложения I, не выпуская общедоступный отчет об исследовании, сопровождающий изменение по сравнению с предыдущим суверенным рейтингом или связанным с ним рейтинговым прогнозом, или не включая в этот отчет, по крайней мере, информацию, указанную в пункте 2(a) - (d) Части II Раздела D Приложения I.

1. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 7 Раздела B Приложения I, не организуя ведение записей и журнала регистрации для своей кредитной рейтинговой деятельности в соответствии с требованиями указанных положений.

2. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с первым параграфом пункта 8 Раздела B Приложения I, не сохраняя на своей территории записи и журналы регистрации, упомянутые в пункте 7 указанного Раздела, в течение срока не менее пяти лет либо не представляя указанные записи и журналы регистрации по запросу ESMA.

3. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 9 Раздела B Приложения I, не сохраняя записи, устанавливающие соответствующие права и обязанности кредитного рейтингового агентства и оцениваемого лица либо связанных с ним третьих лиц в соответствии с договором на оказание кредитных рейтинговых услуг, в течение периода сотрудничества с указанным оцениваемым лицом или связанными с ним третьими лицами.

3a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает третий подпараграф Статьи 14(3), не уведомляя ESMA о намеченных существенных изменениях существующих рейтинговых методологий, моделей или ключевых рейтинговых предположений или о предлагаемых новых рейтинговых методологиях, моделях или ключевых рейтинговых предположениях, когда оно публикует рейтинговые методологии на своем веб-сайте в соответствии со Статьей 8(5a).

3b. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает первый подпараграф Статьи 8(5a), не публикуя на своем веб-сайте предлагаемые новые рейтинговые методологии или предлагаемые существенные изменения рейтинговых методологий, которые могут иметь влияние на кредитный рейтинг, вместе с объяснением причин изменений и их последствий.

3c. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт (a) Статьи 8(7), не уведомляя ESMA об обнаруженных ошибках в их рейтинговых методологиях или при их применении, или не разъясняя их влияние на кредитные рейтинги, в том числе о необходимости пересмотра выпущенных кредитных рейтингов.

4. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 11(2), не представляя необходимую информацию или не представляя указанную информацию в стандартной форме в соответствии с требованиями указанного параграфа.

4a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 11a(1), не обнародуя требуемую информацию или не предоставляя эту информацию в требуемой форме, указанной в этом параграфе.

5. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 11(3) в совокупности с пунктом 2 Части I Раздела E Приложения I, не представляя ESMA перечень своих дополнительных услуг.

6. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает второй подпараграф Статьи 14(3), не уведомляя ESMA о любых существенных изменениях условий для первоначальной регистрации в соответствии с указанным подпараграфом.

7. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 23b(1), не предоставляя информацию в ответ на решение о запросе информации согласно Статье 23b(3), или предоставляя не соответствующую действительности либо вводящую в заблуждение информацию в ответ на простой запрос информации или решение.

8. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт (c) Статьи 23c(1), не предоставляя разъяснение, или предоставляя не соответствующее действительности либо вводящее в заблуждение разъяснение о фактах или документах, относящихся к предмету и цели проверки.

1. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности с пунктом 2 Раздела B Приложения I, не раскрывая наименования оцениваемых лиц или связанных с ними третьих лиц, от которых оно получает более 5% своего годового дохода.

2. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 6(2) в совокупности со второй частью третьего параграфа пункта 4 Раздела B Приложения I, не раскрывая в окончательных отчетах о составленном рейтинге перечень вспомогательных услуг, оказанных оцениваемому лицу или иному связанному с ним третьему лицу.

3. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 8(1), не раскрывая используемые им в процессе кредитной рейтинговой деятельности методы, модели и ключевые рейтинговые предположения согласно пункту 5 Части I Раздела E Приложения I.

4. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт (a) Статьи 8(6), если после изменения методов, моделей или ключевых рейтинговых предположений, используемых в кредитной рейтинговой деятельности, не раскрывает немедленно состав кредитных рейтингов, которые могут быть затронуты, либо не раскрывает его с помощью тех же средств связи, что и при распространении затронутых кредитных рейтингов.

4a. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт (aa) Статьи 8(6), если оно намерено использовать новые рейтинговые методологии, не информируя ESMA или не публикуя, незамедлительно, на своем веб-сайте результаты консультаций и эти новые рейтинговые методологии вместе с их подробным описанием и датой их применения.

4b. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт (a) Статьи 8(7), не уведомляя тех оцениваемых лиц, которых это касается, об обнаруженных ошибках в их рейтинговых методологиях или при их применении или не объясняя их влияния на их кредитные рейтинги, в том числе о необходимости пересмотра их выпущенных кредитных рейтингов.

4c. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает пункт (b) Статьи 8(7), не публикуя на своем веб-сайте обнаруженные ошибки в их рейтинговых методологиях или при их применении, если эти ошибки влияют на кредитные рейтинги кредитного рейтингового агентства.

5. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 10(1), не раскрывая вовремя все решения о прекращении кредитного рейтинга с указанием причин для такого решения.

6. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 10(2) в совокупности с пунктом 1 или 2, первым параграфом пункта 4 или пунктами 5 или 6 Части I Раздела D Приложения I, или Части II или III Раздела D Приложения I, не предоставляя информацию, в момент представления кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза согласно указанным положениям.

7. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 10(2) в совокупности с пунктом 3 Части I Раздела D Приложения I, не уведомляя оцениваемое лицо в рабочие часы оцениваемого лица и как минимум за полный рабочий день до публикации кредитного рейтинга или рейтингового прогноза.

8. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 10(3), не обеспечивая четкое разграничение рейтинговых категорий, присваиваемых инструментам секьюритизации, от рейтинговых категорий, используемых для любых других лиц, финансовых инструментов или долговых обязательств, с помощью дополнительного символа.

9. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 10(4), не раскрывая свои правила и процедуры в отношении кредитных рейтингов, составленных по собственной инициативе.

10. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 10(5), не представляя при выпуске кредитного рейтинга, составленного по собственной инициативе, информацию согласно указанному параграфу либо не обозначая кредитный рейтинг, составленный по собственной инициативе, в качестве такового.

11. Кредитное рейтинговое агентство нарушает Статью 11(1), не раскрывая полностью либо не обновляя немедленно информацию, связанную с вопросами, рассматриваемыми в Части I Раздела E Приложения I.

Следующие коэффициенты применяются совокупно к основным суммам, указанным в Статье 36a(2), на основании следующих отягчающих и смягчающих обстоятельств:

1. Если нарушение совершается повторно, за каждое повторное нарушение добавляется коэффициент 1,1.

2. Если нарушение совершалось в течение более чем шести месяцев, применяется коэффициент 1,5.

3. Если нарушение выявило системные проблемы в организации кредитного рейтингового агентства, в частности, в его процедурах, системе менеджмента или системе внутреннего контроля качества, применяется коэффициент 2,2.

4. Если нарушение имело отрицательный эффект на качество рейтингов, составленных соответствующим кредитным рейтинговым агентством, применяется коэффициент 1,5.

5. Если нарушение было совершено умышленно, применяется коэффициент 2.

6. Если с момента обнаружения нарушения не были предприняты меры по его устранению, применяется коэффициент 1,7.

7. Если высшее руководство кредитного рейтингового агентства не содействовало ESMA в проведении проверок, применяется коэффициент 1,5.

1. Если нарушение связано с отклонениями, указанными в Разделе II или III Приложения III, и совершалось в течение менее чем 10 рабочих дней, применяется коэффициент 0,9.

2. Если высшее руководство кредитного рейтингового агентства продемонстрирует, что им были предприняты все необходимые меры для предотвращения нарушения, применяется коэффициент 0,7.

3. Если кредитное рейтинговое агентство быстро, эффективно и в полной мере довело информацию о нарушении до сведения ESMA, применяется коэффициент 0,4.

4. Если кредитное рейтинговое агентство добровольно приняло меры для предотвращения аналогичных нарушений в будущем, применяется коэффициент 0,6.

---

<*> This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document

This Regulation introduces a common regulatory approach in order to enhance the integrity, transparency, responsibility, good governance and independence of credit rating activities, contributing to the quality of credit ratings issued in the Union and to the smooth functioning of the internal market, while achieving a high level of consumer and investor protection. It lays down conditions for the issuing of credit ratings and rules on the organisation and conduct of credit rating agencies, including their shareholders and members, to promote credit rating agencies' independence, the avoidance of conflicts of interest, and the enhancement of consumer and investor protection.

This Regulation also lays down obligations for issuers and related third parties established in the Union regarding securitisation instruments.

1. This Regulation applies to credit ratings issued by credit rating agencies registered in the Union and which are disclosed publicly or distributed by subscription.

2. This Regulation does not apply to:

(a) private credit ratings produced pursuant to an individual order and provided exclusively to the person who placed the order and which are not intended for public disclosure or distribution by subscription;

(b) credit scores, credit scoring systems or similar assessments related to obligations arising from consumer, commercial or industrial relationships;

(c) credit ratings produced by export credit agencies in accordance with point 1.3 of Part 1 of Annex VI to Directive 2006/48/EC; or

(d) credit ratings produced by the central banks and which:

(i) are not paid for by the rated entity;

(ii) are not disclosed to the public;

(iii) are issued in accordance with the principles, standards and procedures which ensure the adequate integrity and independence of credit rating activities as provided for by this Regulation; and

(iv) do not relate to financial instruments issued by the respective central banks' Member States.

4. In order to ensure the uniform application of paragraph 2(d), the Commission may, upon submission of a request by a Member State, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 38(3) and in accordance with paragraph 2(d) of this Article, adopt a decision stating that a central bank falls within the scope of that point and that its credit ratings are therefore exempt from the application of this Regulation.

The Commission shall publish on its website the list of central banks falling within the scope of paragraph 2(d) of this Article.

1. For the purpose of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:

(a) «credit rating» means an opinion regarding the creditworthiness of an entity, a debt or financial obligation, debt security, preferred share or other financial instrument, or of an issuer of such a debt or financial obligation, debt security, preferred share or other financial instrument, issued using an established and defined ranking system of rating categories;

(b) «credit rating agency» means a legal person whose occupation includes the issuing of credit ratings on a professional basis;

(c) «home Member State» means the Member State in which the credit rating agency has its registered office;

(d) «rating analyst» means a person who performs analytical functions that are necessary for the issuing of a credit rating;

(e) «lead rating analyst» means a person with primary responsibility for elaborating a credit rating or for communicating with the issuer with respect to a particular credit rating or, generally, with respect to the credit rating of a financial instrument issued by that issuer and, where relevant, for preparing recommendations to the rating committee in relation to such rating;

(f) «rated entity» means a legal person whose creditworthiness is explicitly or implicitly rated in the credit rating, whether or not it has solicited that credit rating and whether or not it has provided information for that credit rating;

(g) «regulatory purposes» means the use of credit ratings for the specific purpose of complying with Union law, or with Union law as implemented by the national legislation of the Member States;

(h) «rating category» means a rating symbol, such as a letter or numerical symbol which might be accompanied by appending identifying characters, used in a credit rating to provide a relative measure of risk to distinguish the different risk characteristics of the types of rated entities, issuers and financial instruments or other assets;

(i) «related third party» means the originator, arranger, sponsor, servicer or any other party that interacts with a credit rating agency on behalf of a rated entity, including any person directly or indirectly linked to that rated entity by control;

(j) «control» means the relationship between a parent undertaking and a subsidiary, as described in Article 1 of Council Directive 83/349/EEC of 13 June 1983 on consolidated accounts <*>, or a close link between any natural or legal person and an undertaking;

---

<*> OJ L 193, 18.7.1983, p. 1.

(k) «financial instrument» means any of the instruments listed in Section C of Annex I to Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments <*>;

---

<*> OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

(l) «securitisation instrument» means a financial instrument or other assets resulting from a securitisation transaction or scheme referred to in Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 (Securitisation Regulation);

(m) «group of credit rating agencies» means a group of undertakings established in the Union consisting of a parent undertaking and its subsidiaries within the meaning of Articles 1 and 2 of Directive 83/349/EEC as well as undertakings linked to each other by a relationship within the meaning of Article 12(1) of Directive 83/349/EEC and whose occupation includes the issuing of credit ratings. For the purposes of Article 4(3)(a), a group of credit rating agencies shall also include credit rating agencies established in third countries;

(n) «senior management» means the person or persons who effectively direct the business of the credit rating agency and the member or members of its administrative or supervisory board;

(o) «credit rating activities» means data and information analysis and the evaluation, approval, issuing and review of credit ratings;

(p) «competent authorities» means the authorities designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 22;

(pa) «credit institution» means a credit institution as defined in point (1) of Article 4 of Directive 2006/48/EC;

(pb) «investment firm» means an investment firm as defined in point (1) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC;

(pc) «insurance undertaking» means an insurance undertaking as defined in point (1) of Article 13 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) <*>;

---

<*> OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1.

(pd) «reinsurance undertaking» means a reinsurance undertaking as defined in point (4) of Article 13 of Directive 2009/138/EC;

(pe) «institution for occupational retirement provision» means an institution for occupational retirement provision as defined in Article 6(a) of Directive 2003/41/EC;

(pf) «management company» means a management company as defined in Article 2(1)(b) of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) <*>;

---

<*> OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 32.

(pg) «investment company» means an investment company authorised in accordance with Directive 2009/65/EC;

(ph) «alternative investment fund manager» means an AIFM as defined in Article 4(1)(b) of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers <*>;

---

<*> OJ L 174, 1.7.2011, p. 1.

(pi) «central counterparty» means a CCP as defined in point (1) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories <*> which is authorised in accordance with Article 14 of that Regulation;

---

<*> OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 1.

(pj) «prospectus» means a prospectus published under Directive 2003/71/EC and Regulation (EC) No 809/2004;

(q) «sectoral legislation» means the legislative acts of the Union referred to in points (pa) to (pj);

(r) «sectoral competent authorities» means the national competent authorities designated under the relevant sectoral legislation for the supervision of credit institutions, investment firms, insurance undertakings, reinsurance undertakings, institutions for occupational retirement provision, management companies, investment companies, alternative investment fund managers, central counterparties and prospectuses;

(s) «issuer» means an issuer as defined in Article 2(1)(h) of Directive 2003/71/EC;

(t) «originator» means an originator as defined in point (41) of Article 4 of Directive 2006/48/EC;

(u) «sponsor» means a sponsor as defined in point (42) of Article 4 of Directive 2006/48/EC;

(v) «sovereign rating» means:

(i) a credit rating where the entity rated is a State or a regional or local authority of a State;

(ii) a credit rating where the issuer of the debt or financial obligation, debt security or other financial instrument is a State or a regional or local authority of a State, or a special purpose vehicle of a State or of a regional or local authority;

(iii) a credit rating where the issuer is an international financial institution established by two or more States which has the purpose of mobilising funding and providing financial assistance for the benefit of the members of that international financial institution which are experiencing or threatened by severe financing problems;

(w) «rating outlook» means an opinion regarding the likely direction of a credit rating over the short term, the medium term or both;

(x) «unsolicited credit rating» and «unsolicited sovereign rating» mean, respectively, a credit rating or a sovereign rating assigned by a credit rating agency other than upon request;

(y) «credit score» means a measure of creditworthiness derived from summarising and expressing data based only on a pre-established statistical system or model, without any additional substantial rating-specific analytical input from a rating analyst;

(z) «regulated market» means a regulated market as defined in point (14) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC and established in the Union;

(aa) «re-securitisation» means re-securitisation as defined in point (40a) of Article 4 of Directive 2006/48/EC.

2. For the purposes of paragraph 1(a), the following shall not be considered to be credit ratings:

(a) recommendations within the meaning of Article 1(3) of Commission Directive 2003/125/EC <*>;

---

<*> OJ L 339, 24.12.2003, p. 73.

(b) investment research as defined in Article 24(1) of Directive 2006/73/EC <*> and other forms of general recommendation, such as «buy», «sell» or «hold», relating to transactions in financial instruments or to financial obligations; or

---

<*> Commission Directive 2006/73/EC of 10 August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that Directive (OJ L 241, 2.9.2006, p. 26).

(c) opinions about the value of a financial instrument or a financial obligation.

3. For the purposes of this Regulation, the term «shareholder» includes beneficial owners, as defined in point (6) of Article 3 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing <*>.

---

Article 4

1. Credit institutions, investment firms, insurance undertakings, reinsurance undertakings, institutions for occupational retirement provision, management companies, investment companies, alternative investment fund managers and central counterparties may use credit ratings for regulatory purposes only if they are issued by credit rating agencies established in the Union and registered in accordance with this Regulation.

Where a prospectus contains a reference to a credit rating or credit ratings, the issuer, offeror, or person asking for admission to trading on a regulated market shall ensure that the prospectus also includes clear and prominent information stating whether or not such credit ratings are issued by a credit rating agency established in the Union and registered under this Regulation.

2. A credit rating agency established in the Union and registered in accordance with this Regulation shall be deemed to have issued a credit rating when the credit rating has been published on the credit rating agency's website or by other means or distributed by subscription and presented and disclosed in accordance with the obligations of Article 10, clearly identifying that the credit rating is endorsed in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article.

3. A credit rating agency established in the Union and registered in accordance with this Regulation may endorse a credit rating issued in a third country only when credit rating activities resulting in the issuing of such a credit rating comply with the following conditions:

(a) the credit rating activities resulting in the issuing of the credit rating to be endorsed are undertaken in whole or in part by the endorsing credit rating agency or by credit rating agencies belonging to the same group;

(b) the credit rating agency has verified and is able to demonstrate on an ongoing basis to the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) (ESMA) established by Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council <*>, that the conduct of the credit rating activities by the third-country credit rating agency resulting in the issuing of the credit rating to be endorsed fulfils requirements which are at least as stringent as the requirements set out in Articles 6 to 12 and Annex I, with the exception of Articles 6a, 6b, 8a, 8c and 11a, point (ba) of point 3 and points 3a and 3b of Section B of Annex I.

---

<*> OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84.

(c) the ability of ESMA to assess and monitor the compliance of the credit rating agency established in the third country with the requirements referred to in point (b) is not limited;

(d) the credit rating agency makes available on request to ESMA all the information necessary to enable ESMA to supervise on an ongoing basis the compliance with the requirements of this Regulation;

(e) there is an objective reason for the credit rating to be elaborated in a third country;

(f) the credit rating agency established in the third country is authorised or registered, and is subject to supervision, in that third country;

(g) the regulatory regime in that third country prevents interference by the competent authorities and other public authorities of that third country with the content of credit ratings and methodologies; and

(h) there is an appropriate cooperation arrangement between ESMA and the relevant supervisory authority of the credit rating agency established in a third country. ESMA shall ensure that such a cooperation arrangement shall specify at least:

(i) the mechanism for the exchange of information between ESMA and the relevant supervisory authority of the credit rating agency established in a third country; and

(ii) the procedures concerning the coordination of supervisory activities in order to enable ESMA to monitor credit rating activities resulting in the issuing of the endorsed credit rating on an ongoing basis.

4. A credit rating endorsed in accordance with paragraph 3 shall be considered to be a credit rating issued by a credit rating agency established in the Union and registered in accordance with this Regulation.

A credit rating agency established in the Union and registered in accordance with this Regulation shall not use such endorsement with the intention of avoiding the requirements of this Regulation.

5. The credit rating agency that has endorsed a credit rating issued in a third country in accordance with paragraph 3 shall remain fully responsible for such a credit rating and for the fulfilment of conditions set out therein.

6. Where the Commission has recognised, in accordance with Article 5(6), the legal and supervisory framework of a third country as equivalent to the requirements of this Regulation and the cooperation arrangements referred to in Article 5(7) are operational, the credit rating agency endorsing credit ratings issued in that third country shall no longer be required to verify or demonstrate that the condition laid down in paragraph 3(g) of this Article is fulfilled.

1. The credit ratings that are related to entities established or financial instruments issued in third countries and that are issued by a credit rating agency established in a third country may be used in the Union under Article 4(1) without being endorsed in accordance with Article 4(3), provided that:

(a) the credit rating agency is authorised or registered in and is subject to supervision in that third country;

(b) the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Article, recognising the legal and supervisory framework of that third country as equivalent to the requirements of this Regulation;

(c) the cooperation arrangements referred to in paragraph 7 of this Article are operational;

(d) the credit ratings issued by the credit rating agency and its credit rating activities are not of systemic importance to the financial stability or integrity of the financial markets of one or more Member States; and

(e) the credit rating agency is certified in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article.

2. The credit rating agency referred to in paragraph 1 may apply for certification. The application shall be submitted to ESMA in accordance with the relevant provisions of Article 15.

3. ESMA shall examine and decide on the application for certification in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 16. The certification decision shall be based on the criteria set out in points (a) to (d) of paragraph 1 of this Article.

The certification decision shall be notified and published in accordance with Article 18.

4. The credit rating agency referred to in paragraph 1 may also apply to be exempted:

(a) on a case-by-case basis from complying with some or all of the requirements set out in Section A of Annex I and Article 7(4) if the credit rating agency is able to demonstrate that the requirements are not proportionate in view of the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of its issuing of credit ratings;

(b) from the requirement of physical presence in the Union where such a requirement would be too burdensome and disproportionate in view of the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of its issuing of credit ratings.

An application for an exemption under point (a) or (b) of the first subparagraph shall be submitted by the credit rating agency together with the application for certification. When assessing such an application, ESMA shall take into consideration the size of the credit rating agency referred to in paragraph 1, having regard to the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of its issuing of credit ratings, as well as the impact of the credit ratings issued by the credit rating agency on the financial stability and integrity of the financial markets of one or more Member States. On the basis of those considerations, ESMA may grant such exemption to the credit rating agency referred to in paragraph 1.

6. The Commission may adopt an equivalence decision in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 38(3), stating that the legal and supervisory framework of a third country ensures that credit rating agencies authorised or registered in that third country comply with legally binding requirements which are equivalent to the requirements resulting from this Regulation and which are subject to effective supervision and enforcement in that third country.

A third-country legal and supervisory framework may be considered equivalent to this Regulation if that framework fulfils at least the following conditions:

(a) credit rating agencies in that third country are subject to authorisation or registration and are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an ongoing basis;

(b) credit rating agencies in that third country are subject to legally binding rules which are equivalent to those set out in Articles 6 to 12 and Annex I, with the exception of Articles 6a, 6b, 8a, 8c and 11a, point (ba) of point 3 and points 3a and 3b of Section B of Annex I; and

(c) the regulatory regime in that third country prevents interference by the supervisory authorities and other public authorities of that third country with the content of credit ratings and methodologies.

In order to take account of developments on financial markets, the Commission shall adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a, and subject to the conditions of Articles 38b and 38c, measures to specify further or amend the criteria set out in points (a), (b) and (c) of the second subparagraph of this paragraph.

7. ESMA shall establish cooperation agreements with the relevant supervisory authorities of third countries whose legal and supervisory frameworks have been considered equivalent to this Regulation in accordance with paragraph 6. Such arrangements shall specify at least:

(a) the mechanism for the exchange of information between ESMA and the relevant supervisory authorities of the third countries concerned; and

(b) the procedures concerning the coordination of supervisory activities.

8. Articles 20, 23b and 24 shall apply to credit rating agencies certified in accordance with Article 5(3) and to credit ratings issued by them.

1. The entitites referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(1) shall make their own credit risk assessment and shall not solely or mechanistically rely on credit ratings for assessing the creditworthiness of an entity or financial instrument.

2. Sectoral competent authorities in charge of supervising the entities referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(1) shall, taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their activities, monitor the adequacy of their credit risk assessment processes, assess the use of contractual references to credit ratings and, where appropriate, encourage them to mitigate the impact of such references, with a view to reducing sole and mechanistic reliance on credit ratings, in line with specific sectoral legislation.

1. The European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) (EBA) established by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council <*>, the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) (EIOPA) established by Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council <**> and ESMA shall not refer to credit ratings in their guidelines, recommendations and draft technical standards where such references have the potential to trigger sole or mechanistic reliance on credit ratings by the competent authorities, the sectoral competent authorities, the entitites referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(1) or other financial market participants. Accordingly, by 31 December 2013, EBA, EIOPA and esma shall review and remove, where appropriate, all such references to credit ratings in existing guidelines and recommendations.

---

<*> OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12.

<**> OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 48.

2. The European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) established by Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on European Union macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board <*> shall not refer to credit ratings in its warnings and recommendations where such references have the potential to trigger sole or mechanistic reliance on credit ratings.

---

Article 5c

Without prejudice to its right of initiative, the Commission shall continue to review whether references to credit ratings in Union law trigger or have the potential to trigger sole or mechanistic reliance on credit ratings by the competent authorities, the sectoral competent authorities, the entities referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(1) or other financial market participants with a view to deleting all references to credit ratings in Union law for regulatory purposes by 1 January 2020, provided that appropriate alternatives to credit risk assessment have been identified and implemented.

1. A credit rating agency shall take all necessary steps to ensure that the issuing of a credit rating or a rating outlook is not affected by any existing or potential conflicts of interest or business relationship involving the credit rating agency issuing the credit rating or the rating outlook, its shareholders, managers, rating analysts, employees or any other natural person whose services are placed at the disposal or under the control of the credit rating agency, or any person directly or indirectly linked to it by control.

2. In order to ensure compliance with paragraph 1, a credit rating agency shall comply with the requirements set out in Sections A and B of Annex I.

3. At the request of a credit rating agency, ESMA may exempt a credit rating agency from complying with the requirements of points 2, 5, 6 and 9 of Section A of Annex I and Article 7(4) if the credit rating agency is able to demonstrate that those requirements are not proportionate in view of the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of issue of credit ratings and that:

(a) the credit rating agency has fewer than 50 employees;

(b) the credit rating agency has implemented measures and procedures, in particular internal control mechanisms, reporting arrangements and measures ensuring independence of rating analysts and persons approving credit ratings, which ensure the effective compliance with the objectives of this Regulation; and

(c) the size of the credit rating agency is not determined in such a way as to avoid compliance with the requirements of this Regulation by a credit rating agency or a group of credit rating agencies.

In the case of a group of credit rating agencies, ESMA shall ensure that at least one of the credit rating agencies in the group is not exempted from complying with the requirements of points 2, 5 and 6 of Section A of Annex I and Article 7(4).

4. Credit rating agencies shall establish, maintain, enforce and document an effective internal control structure governing the implementation of policies and procedures to prevent and mitigate possible conflicts of interest and to ensure the independence of credit ratings, rating analysts and rating teams regarding shareholders, administrative and management bodies and sales and marketing activities. Credit rating agencies shall establish standard operating procedures (SOPs) with regard to corporate governance, organisation, and the management of conflicts of interest. They shall periodically monitor and review those SOPs in order to evaluate their effectiveness and assess whether they should be updated.

1. A shareholder or a member of a credit rating agency holding at least 5% of either the capital or the voting rights in that credit rating agency or in a company which has the power to exercise control or a dominant influence over that credit rating agency, shall be prohibited from:

(a) holding 5% or more of the capital of any other credit rating agency;

(b) having the right or the power to exercise 5% or more of the voting rights in any other credit rating agency;

(c) having the right or the power to appoint or remove members of the administrative or supervisory board of any other credit rating agency;

(d) being a member of the administrative or supervisory board of any other credit rating agency;

(e) exercising or having the power to exercise control or a dominant influence over any other credit rating agency.

The prohibition referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph does not apply to holdings in diversified collective investment schemes, including managed funds such as pension funds or life insurance, provided that the holdings in such schemes do not put the shareholder or member of a credit rating agency in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of those schemes.

2. This Article does not apply to investments in other credit rating agencies belonging to the same group of credit rating agencies.

1. Where a credit rating agency enters into a contract for the issuing of credit ratings on re-securitisations, it shall not issue credit ratings on new re-securitisations with underlying assets from the same originator for a period exceeding four years.

2. Where a credit rating agency enters into a contract for rating re-securitisations, it shall request that the issuer:

(a) determine the number of credit rating agencies which have a contractual relationship for the issuing of credit ratings on re-securitisations with underlying assets from the same originator;

(b) calculate the percentage of the total number of outstanding rated re-securitisations with underlying assets from the same originator for which each credit rating agency issues credit ratings.

Where at least four credit rating agencies each rate more than 10% of the total number of outstanding rated re-securitisations, the limitations set out in paragraph 1 shall not apply.

The exemption set out in the second subparagraph shall continue to apply at least until the credit rating agency enters into a new contract for rating re-securitisations with underlying assets from the same originator. Where the criteria set out in the second subparagraph are not met when entering into such a contract, the period referred to in paragraph 1 shall be calculated from the date on which the new contract was entered into.

3. As from the expiry of a contract pursuant to paragraph 1, a credit rating agency shall not enter into a new contract for the issuing of credit ratings on re-securitisations with underlying assets from the same originator for a period equal to the duration of the expired contract but not exceeding four years.

The first subparagraph shall also apply to:

(a) a credit rating agency belonging to the same group of credit rating agencies as the credit rating agency referred to in paragraph 1;

(b) a credit rating agency which is a shareholder or member of the credit rating agency referred to in paragraph 1;

(c) a credit rating agency in which the credit rating agency referred to in paragraph 1 is a shareholder or member.

4. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, where a credit rating of a re-securitisation is issued before the end of the maximum duration of the contractual relationship as referred to in paragraph 1, a credit rating agency may continue to monitor and update those credit ratings, on a solicited basis, for the duration of the re-securitisation.

5. This Article shall not apply to credit rating agencies that have fewer than 50 employees at group level involved in the provision of credit rating activities, or that have an annual turnover generated from credit rating activities of less than EUR 10 million at group level.

6. Where a credit rating agency enters into a contract for the issuing of credit ratings on re-securitisations before 20 June 2013, the period referred to in paragraph 1 shall be calculated from that date.

1. A credit rating agency shall ensure that rating analysts, its employees and any other natural person whose services are placed at its disposal or under its control and who are directly involved in credit rating activities have appropriate knowledge and experience for the duties assigned.

2. A credit rating agency shall ensure that persons referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be allowed to initiate or participate in negotiations regarding fees or payments with any rated entity, related third party or any person directly or indirectly linked to the rated entity by control.

3. A credit rating agency shall ensure that persons referred to in paragraph 1 meet the requirements set out in Section C of Annex I.

4. A credit rating agency shall establish an appropriate gradual rotation mechanism with regard to the rating analysts and persons approving credit ratings as defined in Section C of Annex I. That rotation mechanism shall be undertaken in phases on the basis of individuals rather than of a complete team.

5. Compensation and performance evaluation of employees involved in the credit rating activities or rating outlooks, as well as persons approving the credit ratings or rating outlooks, shall not be contingent on the amount of revenue that the credit rating agency derives from the rated entities or related third parties.

1. A credit rating agency shall disclose to the public the methodologies, models and key rating assumptions it uses in its credit rating activities as defined in point 5 of Part I of Section E of Annex I.

2. A credit rating agency shall adopt, implement and enforce adequate measures to ensure that the credit ratings and the rating outlooks it issues are based on a thorough analysis of all the information that is available to it and that is relevant to its analysis according to the applicable rating methodologies. It shall adopt all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning credit ratings and rating outlooks is of sufficient quality and from reliable sources. The credit rating agency shall issue credit ratings and rating outlooks stipulating that the rating is the agency's opinion and should be relied upon to a limited degree.

2a. Changes in credit ratings shall be issued in accordance with the credit rating agency's published rating methodologies.

3. A credit rating agency shall use rating methodologies that are rigorous, systematic, continuous and subject to validation based on historical experience, including back-testing.

4. Where a credit rating agency is using an existing credit rating prepared by another credit rating agency with respect to underlying assets or securitisation instruments, it shall not refuse to issue a credit rating of an entity or a financial instrument because a portion of the entity or the financial instrument had been previously rated by another credit rating agency.

A credit rating agency shall record all instances where in its credit rating process it departs from existing credit ratings prepared by another credit rating agency with respect to underlying assets or securitisation instruments providing a justification for the differing assessment.

5. A credit rating agency shall monitor credit ratings and review its credit ratings and methodologies on an ongoing basis and at least annually, in particular where material changes occur that could have an impact on a credit rating. A credit rating agency shall establish internal arrangements to monitor the impact of changes in macroeconomic or financial market conditions on credit ratings.

Sovereign ratings shall be reviewed at least every six months.

5a. A credit rating agency that intends to make a material change to, or use, new rating methodologies, models or key rating assumptions which could have an impact on a credit rating shall publish the proposed material changes or proposed new rating methodologies on its website inviting stakeholders to submit comments for a period of one month together with a detailed explanation of the reasons for and the implications of the proposed material changes or proposed new rating methodologies.

6. Where rating methodologies, models or key rating assumptions used in credit rating activities are changed in accordance with Article 14(3), a credit rating agency shall:

(a) immediately, using the same means of communication as used for the distribution of the affected credit ratings, disclose the likely scope of credit ratings to be affected;

(aa) immediately inform ESMA and publish on its website the results of the consultation and the new rating methodologies together with a detailed explanation thereof and their date of application;

(ab) immediately publish on its website the responses to the consultation referred to in paragraph 5a except in cases where confidentiality is requested by the respondent to the consultation;

(b) review the affected credit ratings as soon as possible and no later than six months after the change, in the meantime placing those ratings under observation; and

(c) re-rate all credit ratings that have been based on those methodologies, models or key rating assumptions if, following the review, the overall combined effect of the changes affects those credit ratings.

7. Where a credit rating agency becomes aware of errors in its rating methodologies or in their application it shall immediately:

(a) notify those errors to ESMA and all affected rated entities explaining the impact on its ratings including the need to review issued ratings;

(b) where errors have an impact on its credit ratings, publish those errors on its website;

(c) correct those errors in the rating methodologies; and

(d) apply the measures referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 6.

1. Sovereign ratings shall be issued in a manner which ensures that the individual specificity of a particular Member State has been analysed. A statement announcing revision of a given group of countries shall be prohibited if it is not accompanied by individual country reports. Such reports shall be made publicly available.

2. Public communications other than credit ratings, rating outlooks, or accompanying press releases or reports as referred to in point 5 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, which relate to potential changes in sovereign ratings shall not be based on information within the sphere of the rated entity that has been disclosed without the consent of the rated entity, unless it is available from generally accessible sources or unless there are no legitimate reasons for the rated entity not to give its consent to the disclosure of the information.

3. A credit rating agency shall, taking into consideration the second subparagraph of Article 8(5), publish on its website and submit to ESMA on an annual basis, in accordance with point 3 of Part III of Section D of Annex I, a calendar at the end of December for the following 12 months, setting a maximum of three dates for the publication of unsolicited sovereign ratings and related rating outlooks and setting the dates for the publication of solicited sovereign ratings and related rating outlooks. Such dates shall be set on a Friday.

4. Deviation of the publication of sovereign ratings or related rating outlooks from the calendar shall only be possible where necessary for the credit rating agency to comply with its obligations under Article 8(2), Article 10(1) and Article 11(1) and shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the reasons for the deviation from the announced calendar.

1. Where an issuer or a related third party intends to solicit a credit rating of a securitisation instrument, it shall appoint at least two credit rating agencies to provide credit ratings independently of each other.

2. The issuer or a related third party as referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure that the appointed credit rating agencies comply with the following conditions:

(a) they do not belong to the same group of credit rating agencies;

(b) they are not a shareholder or a member of any of the other credit rating agencies;

(c) they do not have the right or the power to exercise voting rights in any of the other credit rating agencies;

(d) they do not have the right or the power to appoint or remove members of the administrative or supervisory board of any of the other credit rating agencies;

(e) none of the members of their administrative or supervisory boards are a member of the administrative or supervisory boards of any of the other credit rating agencies;

(f) they do not exercise, or have the power to exercise, control or a dominant influence over any of the other credit rating agencies.

1. Where an issuer or a related third party intends to appoint at least two credit rating agencies for the credit rating of the same issuance or entity, the issuer or a related third party shall consider appointing at least one credit rating agency with no more than 10% of the total market share, which can be evaluated by the issuer or a related third party as capable of rating the relevant issuance or entity, provided that, based on ESMA's list referred to in paragraph 2, there is a credit rating agency available for rating the specific issuance or entity. Where the issuer or a related third party does not appoint at least one credit rating agency with no more than 10% of the total market share, this shall be documented.

2. With a view to facilitating the evaluation by the issuer or a related third party under paragraph 1, ESMA shall annually publish on its website a list of registered credit rating agencies, indicating their total market share and the types of credit ratings issued, which can be used by the issuer as a starting point for its evaluation.

3. For the purposes of this Article, total market share shall be measured with reference to annual turnover generated from credit rating activities and ancillary services, at group level.

Outsourcing of important operational functions shall not be undertaken in such a way as to impair materially the quality of the credit rating agency's internal control and the ability of ESMA to supervise the credit rating agency's compliance with obligations under this Regulation.

1. A credit rating agency shall disclose any credit rating or rating outlook, as well as any decision to discontinue a credit rating, on a non-selective basis and in a timely manner. In the event of a decision to discontinue a credit rating, the information disclosed shall include full reasons for the decision.

The first subparagraph shall also apply to credit ratings that are distributed by subscription.

2. Credit rating agencies shall ensure that credit ratings and rating outlooks are presented and processed in accordance with the requirements set out in Section D of Annex I and shall not present factors other than those related to the credit ratings.

2a. Until disclosure to the public of credit ratings, rating outlooks and information relating thereto, they shall be deemed to be inside information as defined in, and in accordance with, Directive 2003/6/EC.

Article 6(3) of that Directive shall apply mutatis mutandis to credit rating agencies as regards their duty of confidentiality and their obligation to maintain a list of persons who have access to their credit ratings, rating outlooks or related information before disclosure.

The list of persons to whom credit ratings, rating outlooks and information relating thereto are communicated before being disclosed shall be limited to persons identified by each rated entity for that purpose.

3. When a credit rating agency issues credit ratings for securitisation instruments, it shall ensure that rating categories that are attributed to securitisation instruments are clearly differentiated using an additional symbol which distinguishes them from rating categories used for any other entities, financial instruments or financial obligations.

4. A credit rating agency shall disclose its policies and procedures regarding unsolicited credit ratings.

5. Where a credit rating agency issues an unsolicited credit rating, it shall state prominently in the credit rating, using a clearly distinguishable different colour code for the rating category, whether or not the rated entity or a related third party participated in the credit rating process and whether the credit rating agency had access to the accounts, management and other relevant internal documents for the rated entity or a related third party.

Unsolicited credit ratings shall be identified as such.

6. A credit rating agency shall not use the name of ESMA or any competent authority in such a way that would indicate or suggest endorsement or approval by ESMA or any competent authority of the credit ratings or any credit rating activities of the credit rating agency.

1. A credit rating agency shall fully disclose to the public and update immediately information relating to the matters set out in Part I of Section E of Annex I.

2. A registered or certified credit rating agency shall make available in a central repository established by ESMA information on its historical performance data, including the ratings transition frequency, and information about credit ratings issued in the past and on their changes. Such a credit rating agency shall provide information to that repository on a standard form as provided for by ESMA. ESMA shall make that information accessible to the public and shall publish summary information on the main developments observed on an annual basis.

3. A credit rating agency shall provide annually, by 31 March, to ESMA information relating to matters set out in point 2 of Part II of Section E of Annex I.

1. A registered or certified credit rating agency shall, when issuing a credit rating or a rating outlook, submit to ESMA rating information, including the credit rating and rating outlook of the rated instrument, information on the type of credit rating, the type of rating action, and date and hour of publication.

2. ESMA shall publish the individual credit ratings submitted to it pursuant to paragraph 1 on a website («European rating platform»).

The central repository referred to in Article 11(2) shall be incorporated in the European rating platform.

3. This Article shall not apply to credit ratings or rating outlooks which are exclusively produced for and disclosed to investors for a fee.

A credit rating agency shall publish annually a transparency report which includes information on matters set out in Part III of Section E of Annex I. The credit rating agency shall publish its transparency report at the latest three months after the end of each financial year and shall ensure that it remains available on the website of the agency for at least five years.

A credit rating agency shall not charge a fee for the information provided in accordance with Articles 8 to 12.

1. A credit rating agency shall apply for registration for the purposes of Article 2(1) provided that it is a legal person established in the Union.

2. The registration shall be effective for the entire territory of the Union once the decision to register a credit rating agency adopted by ESMA as referred to in Article 16(3) or Article 17(3) has taken effect.

3. A registered credit rating agency shall comply at all times with the conditions for initial registration.

A credit rating agency shall, without undue delay, notify ESMA of any material changes to the conditions for initial registration, including any opening or closing of a branch within the Union.

Without prejudice to the second subparagraph, the credit rating agency shall notify ESMA of the intended material changes to the rating methodologies, models or key rating assumptions or the proposed new rating methodologies, models or key rating assumptions when the credit rating agency publishes the proposed changes or proposed new rating methodologies on its website in accordance with Article 8(5a). After the expiry of the consultation period, the credit rating agency shall notify ESMA of any changes due to the consultation.

4. Without prejudice to Article 16 or 17, ESMA shall register the credit rating agency if it concludes from the examination of the application that the credit rating agency complies with the conditions for the issuing of credit ratings set out in this Regulation, taking into consideration Articles 4 and 6.

5. ESMA shall not impose requirements regarding registration which are not provided for in this Regulation.

1. The credit rating agency shall submit an application for registration to ESMA. The application shall contain information on the matters set out in Annex II.

2. Where a group of credit rating agencies applies for registration, the members of the group shall mandate one of their number to submit all the applications to ESMA on behalf of the group. The mandated credit rating agency shall provide the information on the matters set out in Annex II for each member of the group.

3. A credit rating agency shall submit its application in any of the official languages of the institutions of the Union. The provisions of Regulation No 1 of 15 April 1958 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community <*> shall apply mutatis mutandis to any other communication between ESMA and the credit rating agencies and their staff.

---

<*> OJ 17, 6.10.1958, p. 385/58.

4. Within 20 working days of receipt of the application, ESMA shall assess whether the application is complete. If the application is not complete, ESMA shall set a deadline by which the credit rating agency is to provide additional information.

After assessing an application as complete, ESMA shall notify the credit rating agency accordingly.

1. ESMA shall, within 45 working days of the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(4), examine the application for registration of a credit rating agency based on the compliance of the credit rating agency with the conditions set out in this Regulation.

2. ESMA may extend the period of examination by 15 working days, in particular if the credit rating agency:

(a) envisages endorsing credit ratings as referred to in Article 4(3);

(b) envisages using outsourcing; or

(c) requests exemption from compliance in accordance with Article 6(3).

3. Within 45 working days of the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(4), or within 60 working days thereof where paragraph 2 of this Article applies, ESMA shall adopt a fully reasoned decision to register or refuse registration.

4. The decision adopted by ESMA pursuant to paragraph 3 shall take effect on the fifth working day following its adoption.

1. ESMA shall, within 55 working days of the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(4), examine the applications for registration of a group of credit rating agencies based on the compliance of those credit rating agencies with the conditions set out in this Regulation.

2. ESMA may extend the period of examination by 15 working days, in particular if any of the credit rating agencies in the group:

(a) envisages endorsing credit ratings as referred to in Article 4(3);

(b) envisages using outsourcing; or

(c) requests exemption from compliance in accordance with Article 6(3).

3. Within 55 working days of the notification as referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(4), or within 70 working days thereof where paragraph 2 of this Article applies, ESMA shall adopt a fully reasoned individual decision to register or refuse registration for each credit rating agency of the group.

4. The decision adopted by ESMA pursuant to paragraph 3 shall take effect on the fifth working day following its adoption.

1. Within five working days of the adoption of a decision under Article 16, 17 or 20 ESMA shall notify its decision to the credit rating agency concerned. Where ESMA refuses to register the credit rating agency or withdraws the registration of the credit rating agency, it shall provide full reasons in its decision.

2. ESMA shall communicate to the Commission, EBA, EIOPA, the competent authorities and the sectoral competent authorities, any decision under Article 16, 17 or 20.

3. ESMA shall publish on its website a list of credit rating agencies registered in accordance with this Regulation. That list shall be updated within five working days following the adoption of a decision under Article 16, 17 or 20. The Commission shall publish that updated list in the Official Journal of the European Union within 30 days following such update.

1. ESMA shall charge credit rating agencies fees in accordance with this Regulation and with the Commission regulation referred to in paragraph 2. Those fees shall fully cover ESMA's necessary expenditure relating to the registration, certification and supervision of credit rating agencies and the reimbursement of any costs that the competent authorities may incur carrying out work pursuant to this Regulation, in particular as a result of any delegation of tasks in accordance with Article 30.

2. The Commission shall adopt a regulation on fees. That regulation shall determine in particular the type of fees and the matters for which fees are due, the amount of the fees, the way in which they are to be paid and the way in which ESMA is to reimburse competent authorities in respect of any costs that they may incur carrying out work pursuant to this Regulation, in particular as a result of any delegation of tasks in accordance with Article 30.

The amount of a fee charged to a credit rating agency shall cover all administrative costs and be proportionate to the turnover of the credit rating agency concerned.

The Commission shall adopt the regulation on fees referred to in the first subparagraph by means of a delegated act in accordance with Article 38a and subject to the conditions of Articles 38b and 38c.

1. Without prejudice to Article 24, ESMA shall withdraw the registration of a credit rating agency where the credit rating agency:

(a) expressly renounces the registration or has provided no credit ratings for the preceding six months;

(b) obtained the registration by making false statements or by any other irregular means; or

(c) no longer meets the conditions under which it was registered.

2. The competent authority of a Member State in which credit ratings issued by the credit rating agency concerned are used and which considers that one of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 has been met may request that ESMA examine whether the conditions for the withdrawal of the registration of the credit rating agency concerned are met. If ESMA decides not to withdraw the registration of the credit rating agency concerned, it shall provide full reasons.

3. The decision on the withdrawal of registration shall take immediate effect throughout the Union, subject to the transitional period for the use of credit ratings referred to in Article 24(4).

1. Without prejudice to Article 25a, ESMA shall ensure that this Regulation is applied.

2. In accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA shall issue and update guidelines on the cooperation between ESMA, the competent authorities and the sectoral competent authorities for the purposes of this Regulation and for those of the relevant sectoral legislation, including the procedures and detailed conditions relating to the delegation of tasks.

3. In accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA shall, in cooperation with EBA and EIOPA, issue and update guidelines on the application of the endorsement regime under Article 4(3) of this Regulation by 7 June 2011.

4. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify:

(a) the information to be provided by a credit rating agency in its application for registration as set out in Annex II;

(b) information that the credit rating agency must provide for the application for certification and for the assessment of its systemic importance to the financial stability or integrity of financial markets referred to in Article 5;

(c) the presentation of the information, including structure, format, method and period of reporting, that credit rating agencies shall disclose in accordance with Article 11(2) and point 1 of Part II of Section E of Annex I;

(d) the assessment of compliance of credit rating methodologies with the requirements set out in Article 8(3);

(e) the content and format of ratings data periodic reporting to be requested from registered and certified credit rating agencies for the purpose of ongoing supervision by ESMA.

ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 21 June 2014.

Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

4a. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify:

(a) the content and the presentation of the information, including structure, format, method and timing of reporting that credit rating agencies are to disclose to ESMA in accordance with Article 11a(1); and

(b) the content and format of periodic reporting on fees charged by credit rating agencies for the purpose of ongoing supervision by ESMA.

ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 21 June 2014.

Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

4b. ESMA shall report on the possibility of establishing one or more mappings of credit ratings submitted in accordance with Article 11a(1) and submit that report to the Commission by 21 June 2015. The report shall, in particular, assess:

(a) the possibility, cost, and benefit of establishing one or more mappings;

(b) how one or more mappings can be created without misrepresenting credit ratings in light of different rating methodologies;

(c) any effects mappings could have on the regulatory technical standards developed to date in relation to Article 21(4a)(a) and (b).

ESMA shall consult EBA and EIOPA in regard to points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph.

5. ESMA shall publish an annual report on the application of this Regulation. That report shall contain, in particular, an assessment of the implementation of Annex I by the credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation and an assessment of the application of the endorsement mechanism referred to in Article 4(3).

6. ESMA shall present annually to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission a report on supervisory measures taken and penalties imposed by ESMA under this Regulation, including fines and periodic penalty payments.

7. ESMA shall cooperate with EBA and EIOPA in performing its tasks and shall consult EBA and EIOPA before issuing and updating guidelines and submitting draft regulatory technical standards referred to in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4.

1. By 7 June 2010, each Member State shall designate a competent authority for the purpose of this Regulation.

2. Competent authorities shall be adequately staffed, with regard to capacity and expertise, in order to be able to apply this Regulation.

1. In the exercise of its ongoing supervision of credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation, ESMA shall examine regularly compliance with Article 8(3).

2. Without prejudice to Article 23, ESMA shall also in the framework of the examination referred to in paragraph 1:

(a) verify the execution of back-testing by credit rating agencies;

(b) analyse the results of that back-testing; and

(c) verify that the credit rating agencies have processes in place to take into account the results of the back-testing in their rating methodologies.

In carrying out their duties under this Regulation, ESMA, the Commission or any public authorities of a Member State shall not interfere with the content of credit ratings or methodologies.

The powers conferred on ESMA or any official of or other person authorised by ESMA by Articles 23b to 23d shall not be used to require the disclosure of information or documents which are subject to legal privilege.

1. ESMA may by simple request or by decision require credit rating agencies, persons involved in credit rating activities, rated entities and related third parties, third parties to whom the credit rating agencies have outsourced operational functions or activities and persons otherwise closely and substantially related or connected to credit rating agencies or credit rating activities to provide all information that is necessary in order to carry out its duties under this Regulation.

2. When sending a simple request for information under paragraph 1, ESMA shall:

(a) refer to this Article as the legal basis for the request;

(b) state the purpose of the request;

(c) specify what information is required;

(d) set a time-limit within which the information is to be provided;

(e) inform the person from whom the information is requested that there is no obligation to provide the information but that any reply to the request for information must not be incorrect or misleading;

(f) indicate the fine provided for in Article 36a, in conjunction with point 7 of Section II of Annex III, where the answers to questions asked are incorrect or misleading.

3. When requiring the supply of information under paragraph 1 by decision, ESMA shall:

(a) refer to this Article as the legal basis for the request;

(b) state the purpose of the request;

(c) specify what information is required;

(d) set a time-limit within which the information is to be provided;

(e) indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 36b where the production of the required information is incomplete;

(f) indicate the fine provided for in Article 36a, in conjunction with point 7 of Section II of Annex III, where the answers to questions asked are incorrect or misleading; and

(g) indicate the right to appeal the decision before the Board of Appeal and to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in accordance with Articles 60 and 61 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

4. The persons referred to in paragraph 1 or their representatives and, in the case of legal persons or associations having no legal personality, the persons authorised to represent them by law or by their constitution, shall supply the information requested. Lawyers duly authorised to act may supply the information on behalf of their clients. The latter shall remain fully responsible if the information supplied is incomplete, incorrect or misleading.

5. ESMA shall, without delay, send a copy of the simple request or of its decision to the competent authority of the Member State where the persons referred to in paragraph 1 who are concerned by the request for information are domiciled or established.

1. In order to carry out its duties under this Regulation, ESMA may conduct all necessary investigations of persons referred to in Article 23b(1). To that end, the officials of and other persons authorised by ESMA shall be empowered to:

(a) examine any records, data, procedures and any other material relevant to the execution of its tasks irrespective of the medium on which they are stored;

(b) take or obtain certified copies of or extracts from such records, data, procedures and other material;

(c) summon and ask any person referred to in Article 23b(1) or their representatives or staff for oral or written explanations on facts or documents related to the subject matter and purpose of the inspection and to record the answers;

(d) interview any other natural or legal person who consents to be interviewed for the purpose of collecting information relating to the subject matter of an investigation;

(e) request records of telephone and data traffic.

2. The officials of and other persons authorised by ESMA for the purposes of the investigations referred to in paragraph 1 shall exercise their powers upon production of a written authorisation specifying the subject matter and purpose of the investigation. That authorisation shall also indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 36b where the production of the required records, data, procedures or any other material, or the answers to questions asked of the persons referred to in Article 23b(1) are not provided or are incomplete, and the fines provided for in Article 36a, in conjunction with point 8 of Section II of Annex III, where the answers to questions asked of the persons referred to in Article 23b(1) are incorrect or misleading.

3. The persons referred to in Article 23b(1) shall submit to investigations launched on the basis of a decision of ESMA. The decision shall specify the subject matter and purpose of the investigation, the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 36b, the legal remedies available under Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 and the right to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

4. In good time before the investigation, ESMA shall inform the competent authority of the Member State where the investigation is to be carried out of the investigation and of the identity of the authorised persons. Officials of the competent authority concerned shall, upon the request of ESMA, assist those authorised persons in carrying out their duties. Officials of the competent authority concerned may also attend the investigations upon request.

5. If a request for records of telephone or data traffic referred to in point (e) of paragraph 1 requires authorisation from a judicial authority according to national rules, such authorisation shall be applied for. Such authorisation may also be applied for as a precautionary measure.

6. Where authorisation as referred to in paragraph 5 is applied for, the national judicial authority shall control that the decision of ESMA is authentic and that the coercive measures envisaged are neither arbitrary nor excessive having regard to the subject matter of the investigations. In its control of the proportionality of the coercive measures, the national judicial authority may ask ESMA for detailed explanations, in particular relating to the grounds ESMA has for suspecting that an infringement of this Regulation has taken place and the seriousness of the suspected infringement and the nature of the involvement of the person subject to the coercive measures. However, the national judicial authority shall not review the necessity for the investigation or demand that it be provided with the information on ESMA's file. The lawfulness of ESMA's decision shall be subject to review only by the Court of Justice of the European Union following the procedure set out in Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

1. In order to carry out its duties under this Regulation, ESMA may conduct all necessary on-site inspections at the business premises of the legal persons referred to in Article 23b(1). Where the proper conduct and efficiency of the inspection so require, ESMA may carry out the on-site inspection without prior announcement.

2. The officials of and other persons authorised by ESMA to conduct an on-site inspection may enter any business premises and land of the legal persons subject to an investigation decision adopted by ESMA and shall have all the powers stipulated in Article 23c(1). They shall also have the power to seal any business premises and books or records for the period of, and to the extent necessary for, the inspection.

3. The officials of and other persons authorised by ESMA to conduct an on-site inspection shall exercise their powers upon production of a written authorisation specifying the subject matter and purpose of the inspection, and the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 36b where the persons concerned do not submit to the inspection. In good time before the inspection, ESMA shall give notice of the inspection to the competent authority of the Member State where it is to be conducted.

4. The persons referred to in Article 23b(1) shall submit to on-site inspections ordered by decision of ESMA. The decision shall specify the subject matter and purpose of the inspection, specify the date on which it is to begin and indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 36b, the legal remedies available under Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 as well as the right to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union. ESMA shall take such decisions after consulting the competent authority of the Member State where the inspection is to be conducted.

5. Officials of, as well as those authorised or appointed by, the competent authority of the Member State where the inspection is to be conducted shall, upon the request of ESMA, actively assist the officials of and other persons authorised by ESMA. To that end, they shall enjoy the powers set out in paragraph 2. Officials of the competent authority of the Member State concerned may also attend the on-site inspections upon request.

6. ESMA may also require competent authorities to carry out specific investigatory tasks and on-site inspections as provided for in this Article and in Article 23c(1) on its behalf. To that end, competent authorities shall enjoy the same powers as ESMA as set out in this Article and in Article 23c(1).

7. Where the officials of and other accompanying persons authorised by ESMA find that a person opposes an inspection ordered pursuant to this Article, the competent authority of the Member State concerned shall afford them the necessary assistance, requesting, where appropriate, the assistance of the police or of an equivalent enforcement authority, so as to enable them to conduct their on-site inspection.

8. If the on-site inspection provided for in paragraph 1 or the assistance provided for in paragraph 7 requires authorisation by a judicial authority according to national rules, such authorisation shall be applied for. Such authorisation may also be applied for as a precautionary measure.

9. Where authorisation as referred to in paragraph 8 is applied for, the national judicial authority shall control that the decision of ESMA is authentic and that the coercive measures envisaged are neither arbitrary nor excessive having regard to the subject matter of the inspection. In its control of the proportionality of the coercive measures, the national judicial authority may ask ESMA for detailed explanations, in particular relating to the grounds ESMA has for suspecting that an infringement of this Regulation has taken place and the seriousness of the suspected infringement and the nature of the involvement of the person subject to the coercive measures. However, the national judicial authority shall not review the necessity for the inspection or demand to be provided with the information on ESMA's file. The lawfulness of ESMA's decision shall be subject to review only by the Court of Justice of the European Union following the procedure set out in Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

1. Where, in carrying out its duties under this Regulation, ESMA finds that there are serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in Annex III, ESMA shall appoint an independent investigating officer within ESMA to investigate the matter. The investigating officer shall not be involved or have been involved in the direct or indirect supervision or registration process of the credit rating agency concerned and shall perform his functions independently from ESMA's Board of Supervisors.

2. The investigating officer shall investigate the alleged infringements, taking into account any comments submitted by the persons subject to investigation, and shall submit a complete file with his findings to ESMA's Board of Supervisors.

In order to carry out his tasks, the investigating officer may exercise the power to require information in accordance with Article 23b and to conduct investigations and on-site inspections in accordance with Articles 23c and 23d. When using those powers, the investigating officer shall comply with Article 23a.

Where carrying out his tasks, the investigating officer shall have access to all documents and information gathered by ESMA in its supervisory activities.

3. Upon completion of his investigation and before submitting the file with his findings to ESMA's Board of Supervisors, the investigating officer shall give the persons subject to investigation the opportunity to be heard on the matters being investigated. The investigating officer shall base his findings only on facts on which the persons subject to investigation have had the opportunity to comment.

The rights of defence of the persons concerned shall be fully respected during investigations under this Article.

4. When submitting the file with his findings to ESMA's Board of Supervisors, the investigating officer shall notify that fact to the persons subject to investigation. The persons subject to investigation shall be entitled to have access to the file, subject to the legitimate interest of other persons in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information affecting third parties.

5. On the basis of the file containing the investigating officer's findings and, when requested by the persons concerned, after having heard the persons subject to investigation in accordance with Articles 25 and 36c, ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall decide if one or more of the infringements listed in Annex III has been committed by the persons who have been subject to investigation, and in such case, shall take a supervisory measure in accordance with Article 24 and impose a fine in accordance with Article 36a.

6. The investigating officer shall not participate in the deliberations of ESMA's Board of Supervisors or in any other way intervene in the decision-making process of ESMA's Board of Supervisors.

7. The Commission shall adopt further rules of procedure for the exercise of the power to impose fines or periodic penalty payments, including provisions on rights of defence, temporal provisions, and the collection of fines or periodic penalty payments, and shall adopt detailed rules on the limitation periods for the imposition and enforcement of penalties.

The rules referred to in the first subparagraph shall be adopted by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a and subject to the conditions of Articles 38b and 38c.

8. ESMA shall refer matters for criminal prosecution to the relevant national authorities where, in carrying out its duties under this Regulation, it finds that there are serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute criminal offences. In addition, ESMA shall refrain from imposing fines or periodic penalty payments where a prior acquittal or conviction arising from identical facts, or from facts which are substantially the same, has acquired the force of res judicata as the result of criminal proceedings under national law.

1. Where, in accordance with Article 23e(5), ESMA's Board of Supervisors finds that a credit rating agency has committed one of the infringements listed in Annex III, it shall take one or more of the following decisions:

(a) withdraw the registration of the credit rating agency;

(b) temporarily prohibit the credit rating agency from issuing credit ratings with effect throughout the Union, until the infringement has been brought to an end;

(c) suspend the use, for regulatory purposes, of the credit ratings issued by the credit rating agency with effect throughout the Union, until the infringement has been brought to an end;

(d) require the credit rating agency to bring the infringement to an end;

(e) issue public notices.

2. When taking the decisions referred to in paragraph 1, ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall take into account the nature and seriousness of the infringement, having regard to the following criteria:

(a) the duration and frequency of the infringement;

(b) whether the infringement has revealed serious or systemic weaknesses in the undertaking's procedures or in its management systems or internal controls;

(c) whether financial crime was facilitated, occasioned or otherwise attributable to the infringement;

(d) whether the infringement has been committed intentionally or negligently.

3. Before taking the decisions referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 1, ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall inform EBA and EIOPA thereof.

4. Credit ratings may continue to be used for regulatory purposes following the adoption of the decisions referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1 during a period not exceeding:

(a) 10 working days from the date ESMA's decision is made public under paragraph 5 if there are credit ratings of the same financial instrument or entity issued by other credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation; or

(b) three months from the date ESMA's decision is made public under paragraph 5 if there are no credit ratings of the same financial instrument or entity issued by other credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation.

ESMA's Board of Supervisors may extend, including following a request by EBA or EIOPA, the period referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph by three months in exceptional circumstances relating to the potential for market disruption or financial instability.

5. Without undue delay, ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall notify any decision adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 to the credit rating agency concerned and shall communicate any such decision to the competent authorities and the sectoral competent authorities, the Commission, EBA and EIOPA. It shall make public any such decision on its website within 10 working days from the date when it was adopted.

When making public its decision as referred to in the first subparagraph, ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall also make public the right for the credit rating agency concerned to appeal the decision, the fact, where relevant, that such an appeal has been lodged, specifying that such an appeal does not have suspensive effect, and the fact that it is possible for the Board of Appeal to suspend the application of the contested decision in accordance with Article 60(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

1. Before taking any decision under Article 24(1), ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall give the persons subject to the proceedings the opportunity to be heard on ESMA's findings. ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall base its decisions only on findings on which the persons subject to the proceedings have had the opportunity to comment.

The first subparagraph shall not apply if urgent action is needed in order to prevent significant and imminent damage to the financial system. In such a case ESMA's Board of Supervisors may adopt an interim decision and shall give the persons concerned the opportunity to be heard as soon as possible after taking its decision.

2. The rights of defence of the persons subject to the proceedings shall be fully respected during the proceedings. They shall be entitled to have access to ESMA's file, subject to the legitimate interest of other persons in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information.

The sectoral competent authorities shall be responsible for the supervision and enforcement of Article 4(1) and Articles 5a, 8c and 8d in accordance with the relevant sectoral legislation.

ESMA, EBA, EIOPA, the competent authorities and the sectoral competent authorities shall cooperate where it is necessary for the purposes of this Regulation and for those of the relevant sectoral legislation.

1. ESMA, the competent authorities, and the sectoral competent authorities shall, without undue delay, supply each other with the information required for the purposes of carrying out their duties under this Regulation and under the relevant sectoral legislation.

2. ESMA may transmit to the central banks, the European System of Central Banks and the European Central Bank, in their capacity as monetary authorities, to the European Systemic Risk Board and, where appropriate, to other public authorities responsible for overseeing payment and settlement systems, confidential information intended for the performance of their tasks. Similarly, such authorities or bodies shall not be prevented from communicating to ESMA information that ESMA may need in order to carry out its duties under this Regulation.

1. Where it is necessary for the proper performance of a supervisory task, ESMA may delegate specific supervisory tasks to the competent authority of a Member State in accordance with the guidelines issued by ESMA pursuant to Article 21(2). Such specific supervisory tasks may, in particular, include the power to request information in accordance with Article 23b and to conduct investigations and on-site inspections in accordance with Article 23d(6).

2. Prior to the delegation of a task, ESMA shall consult the relevant competent authority. Such consultation shall concern:

(a) the scope of the task to be delegated;

(b) the timetable for the performance of the task to be delegated; and

(c) the transmission of necessary information by and to ESMA.

3. In accordance with the regulation on fees to be adopted by the Commission pursuant to Article 19(2), ESMA shall reimburse a competent authority for the costs incurred as a result of carrying out delegated tasks.

4. ESMA shall review the delegation referred to in paragraph 1 at appropriate intervals. A delegation of tasks may be revoked at any time.

A delegation of tasks shall not affect the responsibility of ESMA and shall not limit ESMA's ability to conduct and oversee the delegated activity. Supervisory responsibilities under this Regulation, including registration decisions, final assessments and follow-up decisions concerning infringements, shall not be delegated.

1. Where a competent authority of a Member State finds that acts contrary to this Regulation are being, or have been, carried out on the territory of its own or of another Member State, it shall give notice of that fact in as specific a manner as possible to ESMA. Where the competent authority considers it appropriate for investigatory purposes, the competent authority may also suggest to ESMA that it assess the need to use the powers under Articles 23b and 23c in relation to the credit rating agency involved in those acts.

ESMA shall take appropriate action. It shall inform the notifying competent authority of the outcome and, as far as possible, of any significant interim developments.

2. Without prejudice to the duty to notify set out in paragraph 1, where the notifying competent authority of a Member State considers that a registered credit rating agency, whose credit ratings are used within the territory of that Member State, breaches the obligations arising from this Regulation and the infringements are sufficiently serious and persistent to have a significant impact on the protection of investors or on the stability of the financial system in that Member State, the notifying competent authority may request that ESMA suspend the use, for regulatory purposes, of credit ratings of the credit rating agency concerned by the financial institutions and other entities referred to in Article 4(1). The notifying competent authority shall provide ESMA with full reasons for its request.

Where ESMA considers that the request is not justified, it shall inform the notifying competent authority in writing, setting out the reasons. Where ESMA considers that the request is justified, it shall take the appropriate measures to resolve the issue.

1. The obligation of professional secrecy shall apply to ESMA, the competent authorities, and all persons who work or who have worked for ESMA, for the competent authorities or for any other person to whom ESMA has delegated tasks, including auditors and experts contracted by ESMA. Information covered by professional secrecy shall not be disclosed to another person or authority except where such disclosure is necessary for legal proceedings.

2. All the information that, under this Regulation, is acquired by, or exchanged between, ESMA, the competent authorities, the sectoral competent authorities or other authorities and bodies referred to in Article 27(2), shall be considered confidential, except where ESMA or the competent authority or other authority or body concerned states at the time of communication that such information may be disclosed or where such disclosure is necessary for legal proceedings.

ESMA may conclude cooperation agreements on exchange of information with the supervisory authorities of third countries only if the information disclosed is subject to guarantees of professional secrecy which are at least equivalent to those set out in Article 32.

Such exchange of information shall be intended for the performance of the tasks of ESMA or those supervisory authorities.

With regard to transfer of personal data to a third country, ESMA shall apply Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data <*>.

---

Article 35

ESMA may disclose the information received from supervisory authorities of third countries only if ESMA or a competent authority has obtained the express agreement of the supervisory authority that has transmitted the information and, where applicable, the information is disclosed only for the purposes for which that supervisory authority gave its agreement or where such disclosure is necessary for legal proceedings.

1. Where a credit rating agency has committed, intentionally or with gross negligence, any of the infringements listed in Annex III having an impact on a credit rating, an investor or issuer may claim damages from that credit rating agency for damage caused to it due to that infringement.

An investor may claim damages under this Article where it establishes that it has reasonably relied, in accordance with Article 5a(1) or otherwise with due care, on a credit rating for a decision to invest into, hold onto or divest from a financial instrument covered by that credit rating.

An issuer may claim damages under this Article where it establishes that it or its financial instruments are covered by that credit rating and the infringement was not caused by misleading and inaccurate information provided by the issuer to the credit rating agency, directly or through information publicly available.

2. It shall be the responsibility of the investor or issuer to present accurate and detailed information indicating that the credit rating agency has committed an infringement of this Regulation, and that that infringement had an impact on the credit rating issued.

What constitutes accurate and detailed information shall be assessed by the competent national court, taking into consideration that the investor or issuer may not have access to information which is purely within the sphere of the credit rating agency.

3. The civil liability of credit rating agencies, as referred to in paragraph 1, shall only be limited in advance where that limitation is:

(a) reasonable and proportionate; and

(b) allowed by the applicable national law in accordance with paragraph 4.

Any limitation that does not comply with the first subparagraph, or any exclusion of civil liability shall be deprived of any legal effect.

4. Terms such as «damage», «intention», «gross negligence», «reasonably relied», «due care», «impact», «reasonable» and «proportionate» which are referred to in this Article but are not defined, shall be interpreted and applied in accordance with the applicable national law as determined by the relevant rules of private international law. Matters concerning the civil liability of a credit rating agency which are not covered by this Regulation shall be governed by the applicable national law as determined by the relevant rules of private international law. The court that is competent to decide on a claim for civil liability brought by an investor or issuer shall be determined by the relevant rules of private international law.

5. This Article does not exclude further civil liability claims in accordance with national law.

6. The right of redress set out in this Article shall not prevent ESMA from fully performing its powers as laid down in Article 36a.

Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of Article 4(1) and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

Member States shall ensure that the sectoral competent authority disclose to the public every penalty that has been imposed for infringements of Article 4(1), unless such disclosure would seriously jeopardise the financial markets or cause disproportionate damage to the parties involved.

By 7 December 2010 the Member States shall notify the rules referred to in the first subparagraph to the Commission. They shall notify the Commission without delay of any subsequent amendment thereto.

1. Where, in accordance with Article 23e(5), ESMA's Board of Supervisors finds that a credit rating agency has, intentionally or negligently, committed one of the infringements listed in Annex III, it shall adopt a decision imposing a fine in accordance with paragraph 2.

An infringement by a credit rating agency shall be considered to have been committed intentionally if ESMA finds objective factors which demonstrate that the credit rating agency or its senior management acted deliberately to commit the infringement.

2. The basic amount of the fines referred to in paragraph 1 shall be included within the following limits:

(a) for the infringements referred to in points 1 to 5, 11 to 15, 19, 20, 23, 26a to 26d, 28, 30, 32, 33, 35, 41, 43, 50, 51 and 55 to 62 of Section I of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 500 000 and shall not exceed EUR 750 000;

(b) for the infringements referred to in points 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 22a, 24, 25, 27, 29, 31, 34, 37 to 40, 42, 42a, 42b, 45 to 49a, 52, 53 and 54 of Section I of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 300 000 and shall not exceed EUR 450 000;

(c) for the infringements referred to in points 9, 10, 26, 36, 44 and 53 of Section I of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 100 000 and shall not exceed EUR 200 000;

(d) for the infringements referred to in points 1, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of Section II of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 50 000 and shall not exceed EUR 150 000;

(e) for the infringements referred to in points 2, 3a to 5 of Section II of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 25 000 and shall not exceed EUR 75 000;

(f) for the infringements referred to in point 3 of Section II of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 10 000 and shall not exceed EUR 50 000;

(g) for the infringements referred to in points 1 to 3 and 11 of Section III of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 150 000 and shall not exceed EUR 300 000;

(h) for the infringements referred to in point 20a of Section I of Annex III, points 4 to 4c, 6, 8 and 10 of Section III of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 90 000 and shall not exceed EUR 200 000;

(i) for the infringements referred to in points 5, 7 and 9 of Section III of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 40 000 and shall not exceed EUR 100 000.

In order to decide whether the basic amount of the fines should be set at the lower, the middle or the higher end of the limits set out in the first subparagraph, ESMA shall have regard to the annual turnover in the preceding business year of the credit rating agency concerned. The basic amount shall be at the lower end of the limit for credit rating agencies whose annual turnover is below EUR 10 million, the middle of the limit for the credit rating agencies whose annual turnover is between EUR 10 and 50 million and the higher end of the limit for the credit rating agencies whose annual turnover is higher than EUR 50 million.

3. The basic amounts defined within the limits set out in paragraph 2 shall be adjusted, if need be, by taking into account aggravating or mitigating factors in accordance with the relevant coefficients set out in Annex IV.

The relevant aggravating coefficient shall be applied one by one to the basic amount. If more than one aggravating coefficient is applicable, the difference between the basic amount and the amount resulting from the application of each individual aggravating coefficient shall be added to the basic amount.

The relevant mitigating coefficient shall be applied one by one to the basic amount. If more than one mitigating coefficient is applicable, the difference between the basic amount and the amount resulting from the application of each individual mitigating coefficient shall be subtracted from the basic amount.

4. Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 and 3, the fine shall not exceed 20% of the annual turnover of the credit rating agency concerned in the preceding business year and, where the credit rating agency has directly or indirectly benefitted financially from the infringement, the fine shall be at least equal to that financial benefit.

Where an act or omission of a credit rating agency constitutes more than one infringement listed in Annex III, only the higher fine calculated in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 and related to one of those infringements shall apply.

1. ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall by decision impose a periodic penalty payment in order to compel:

(a) a credit rating agency to put an end to an infringement, in accordance with a decision taken pursuant to point (d) of Article 24(1);

(b) a person referred to in Article 23b(1) to supply complete information which has been required by a decision pursuant to Article 23b;

(c) a person referred to in Article 23b(1) to submit to an investigation and in particular to produce complete records, data, procedures or any other material required and to complete and correct other information provided in an investigation launched by a decision taken pursuant to Article 23c;

(d) a person referred to in Article 23b(1) to submit to an on-site inspection ordered by a decision taken pursuant to Article 23d.

2. A periodic penalty payment shall be effective and proportionate. The periodic penalty payment shall be imposed on a daily basis until the credit rating agency or person concerned complies with the relevant decision referred to in paragraph 1.

3. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, the amount of a periodic penalty payment shall be 3% of the average daily turnover in the preceding business year or, in the case of natural persons, 2% of the average daily income in the preceding calendar year. It shall be calculated from the date stipulated in the decision imposing the periodic penalty payment.

4. A periodic penalty payment may be imposed for a period of no more than six months following the notification of ESMA's decision.

1. Before taking any decision imposing a fine and/or periodic penalty payment under Article 36a or points (a) to (d) of Article 36b(1), ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall give the persons subject to the proceedings the opportunity to be heard on ESMA's findings. ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall base its decisions only on findings on which the persons subject to the proceedings have had the opportunity to comment.

2. The rights of defence of the persons subject to the proceedings shall be fully respected during the proceedings. They shall be entitled to have access to ESMA's file, subject to the legitimate interest of other persons in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information or internal preparatory documents of ESMA.

1. ESMA shall disclose to the public every fine and periodic penalty payment that has been imposed pursuant to Articles 36a and 36b, unless such disclosure to the public would seriously jeopardise the financial markets or cause disproportionate damage to the parties involved.

2. Fines and periodic penalty payments imposed pursuant to Articles 36a and 36b shall be of an administrative nature.

3. Fines and periodic penalty payments imposed pursuant to Articles 36a and 36b shall be enforceable.

Enforcement shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure in force in the State in the territory of which it is carried out. The order for its enforcement shall be appended to the decision without other formality than verification of the authenticity of the decision by the authority which the government of each Member State shall designate for that purpose and shall make known to ESMA and to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

When those formalities have been completed on application by the party concerned, the latter may proceed to enforcement in accordance with the national law, by bringing the matter directly before the competent body.

Enforcement may be suspended only by a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union. However, the courts of the Member State concerned shall have jurisdiction over complaints that enforcement is being carried out in an irregular manner.

4. The amounts of the fines and periodic penalty payments shall be allocated to the general budget of the European Union.

The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions whereby ESMA has imposed a fine or a periodic penalty payment. It may annul, reduce or increase the fine or periodic penalty payment imposed.

In order to take account of developments, including international developments, on financial markets, in particular in relation to new financial instruments, the Commission may adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a and subject to the conditions of Articles 38b and 38c, measures to amend the Annexes, excluding Annex III.

1. The Commission shall be assisted by the European Securities Committee established by Commission Decision 2001/528/EC <*>.

---

<*> OJ L 191, 13.7.2001, p. 45.

3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.

1. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 5(6), Article 19(2), Article 23e(7) and Article 37 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of four years from 1 June 2011. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegated power at the latest six months before the end of the four-year period. The delegation of power shall be automatically extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council revokes it in accordance with Article 38b.

2. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council.

3. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 38b and 38c.

1. The delegation of power referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 5(6), Article 19(2), Article 23e(7) and Article 37 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.

2. The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke the delegation of power shall endeavour to inform the other institution and the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated power which could be subject to revocation.

3. The decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect immediately or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of the delegated acts already in force. It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

1. The European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act within a period of three months from the date of notification.

At the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council that period shall be extended by three months.

2. If, on expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1, neither the European Parliament nor the Council has objected to the delegated act, it shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the date stated therein.

The delegated act may be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and enter into force before the expiry of that period if the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission of their intention not to raise objections.

3. If either the European Parliament or the Council objects to the delegated act within the period referred to in paragraph 1, it shall not enter into force. In accordance with Article 296 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the institution which objects shall state the reasons for objecting to the delegated act.

4. The Commission shall, after obtaining technical advice from ESMA, review the situation in the credit rating market for securitisation instruments, in particular the credit rating market for re-securitisations. Following that review, the Commission shall, by 1 July 2016, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, accompanied by a legislative proposal if appropriate, assessing, in particular:

(a) the availability of sufficient choice in order to comply with the requirements set out in Articles 6b and 8c;

(b) whether it is appropriate to shorten or extend the maximum duration of the contractual relationship referred to in Article 6b(1) and the minimum period before the credit rating agency may re-enter into a contract with an issuer or a related third party for the issuing of credit ratings on re-securitisations referred to in Article 6b(3);

(c) whether it is appropriate to amend the exemption referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 6b(2).

5. The Commission shall, after obtaining technical advice from ESMA, review the situation in the credit rating market. Following that review, the Commission shall, by 1 January 2016, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, accompanied by a legislative proposal if appropriate, assessing, in particular:

(a) whether there is a need to extend the scope of the obligations referred to in Article 8b to include any other financial credit products;

(b) whether the requirements referred to in Articles 6, 6a and 7 have sufficiently mitigated conflicts of interest;

(c) whether the scope of the rotation mechanism referred to in Article 6b should be extended to other asset classes and whether it is appropriate to use differentiated lengths of periods across asset classes;

(d) the appropriateness of existing and alternative remuneration models;

(e) whether there is a need to implement other measures to foster competition in the credit rating market;

(f) the appropriateness of additional initiatives to promote competition in the credit rating market against the background of the evolution of the structure of the sector;

(g) whether there is a need to propose measures to address contractual over-reliance on credit ratings;

(h) the market concentration levels, the risks arising from high concentration, and the impact on the overall stability of the financial sector.

6. The Commission shall, at least annually, inform the European Parliament and the Council of any new equivalence decisions referred to in Article 5(6) that have been adopted during the reporting period.

By 21 June 2014, ESMA shall assess its staffing and resources needs arising from the assumption of its powers and duties under this Regulation and shall submit a report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.

1. By 31 December 2015, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on:

(a) the steps taken as regards the deletion of references to credit ratings which trigger or have the potential to trigger sole or mechanistic reliance thereon; and

(b) alternative tools to enable investors to make their own credit risk assessment of issuers and of financial instruments,

with a view to deleting all references to credit ratings in Union law for regulatory purposes by 1 January 2020, subject to appropriate alternatives being identified and implemented. ESMA shall provide technical advice to the Commission within the framework of this paragraph.

2. Taking into consideration the situation of the market, the Commission shall, by 31 December 2014, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the appropriateness of the development of a European creditworthiness assessment for sovereign debt.

Taking into consideration the findings of the report referred to in the first subparagraph and the situation of the market, the Commission shall, by 31 December 2016, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, on the appropriateness and feasibility of supporting a European credit rating agency dedicated to assessing the creditworthiness of Member States' sovereign debt and/or a European credit rating foundation for all other credit ratings.

3. The Commission shall, by 31 December 2013, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council regarding the feasibility of a network of smaller credit rating agencies in order to increase competition in the market. That report shall evaluate financial and non-financial support for the creation of such a network, taking into consideration the potential conflicts of interest arising from such public funding. In light of the findings of that report and following ESMA's technical advice, the Commission may re-evaluate and suggest amending Article 8d.

Credit rating agencies operating in the Community before 7 June 2010 (existing credit rating agencies), which intend to apply for registration under this Regulation, shall adopt all necessary measures to comply with its provisions by 7 September 2010.

Credit rating agencies shall submit their application for registration no earlier than 7 June 2010. Existing credit rating agencies shall submit their application for registration by 7 September 2010

Existing credit rating agencies may continue issuing credit ratings which may be used for regulatory purposes by the financial institutions and other entities referred to in Article 4(1) unless registration is refused. Where registration is refused, Article 24(4) and (5) shall apply.

1. All competences and duties related to the supervisory and enforcement activity in the field of credit rating agencies, which were conferred on the competent authorities, whether acting as competent authorities of the home Member State or not, and on colleges where those have been established, shall be terminated on 1 July 2011.

However, an application for registration that has been received by the competent authorities of the home Member State or the relevant college by 7 September 2010 shall not be transferred to ESMA, and the decision to register or refuse registration shall be taken by those authorities and the relevant college.

2. Without prejudice to the second subparagraph of paragraph 1, any files and working documents related to the supervisory and enforcement activity in the field of credit rating agencies, including any ongoing examinations and enforcement actions, or certified copies thereof, shall be taken over by ESMA on the date as referred to in paragraph 1.

3. The competent authorities and colleges referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure that any existing records and working papers, or certified copies thereof, shall be transferred to ESMA as soon as possible and in any event by 1 July 2011. Those competent authorities and colleges shall also render all necessary assistance and advice to ESMA to facilitate effective and efficient transfer and taking-up of supervisory and enforcement activity in the field of credit rating agencies.

4. ESMA shall act as the legal successor of the competent authorities and colleges referred to in paragraph 1 in any administrative or judicial proceedings that result from supervisory and enforcement activity pursued by those competent authorities and colleges in relation to matters that fall under this Regulation.

5. Any registration of a credit rating agency, in accordance with Chapter I of Title III, by a competent authority referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall remain valid after the transfer of competences to ESMA.

6. By 1 July 2014 and within the scope of its ongoing supervision, ESMA shall conduct at least one verification of all credit rating agencies falling under its supervisory competences.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from its date of entry into force. However:

• Article 4(1) shall apply from 7 December 2010 and
• points (f), (g) and (h) of Article 4(3) shall apply from 7 June 2011.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

1. The credit rating agency shall have an administrative or supervisory board. Its senior management shall ensure that:

(a) credit rating activities are independent, including from all political and economic influences or constraints;

(b) conflicts of interest are properly identified, managed and disclosed;

(c) the credit rating agency complies with the remaining requirements of this Regulation.

2. A credit rating agency shall be organised in a way that ensures that its business interest does not impair the independence or accuracy of the credit rating activities.

The senior management of a credit rating agency shall be of good repute and sufficiently skilled and experienced, and shall ensure the sound and prudent management of the credit rating agency.

At least one third, but no less than two, of the members of the administrative or supervisory board of a credit rating agency shall be independent members who are not involved in credit rating activities.

The compensation of the independent members of the administrative or supervisory board shall not be linked to the business performance of the credit rating agency and shall be arranged so as to ensure the independence of their judgement. The term of office of the independent members of the administrative or supervisory board shall be for a pre-agreed fixed period not exceeding five years and shall not be renewable. The dismissal of independent members of the administrative or supervisory board shall take place only in case of misconduct or professional underperformance.

The majority of members of the administrative or supervisory board, including its independent members, shall have sufficient expertise in financial services. Provided that the credit rating agency issues credit ratings of securitisation instruments, at least one independent member and one other member of the board shall have in-depth knowledge and experience at a senior level of the markets in securitisation instruments.

In addition to the overall responsibility of the board, the independent members of the administrative or supervisory board shall have the specific task of monitoring:

(a) the development of the credit rating policy and of the methodologies used by the credit rating agency in its credit rating activities;

(b) the effectiveness of the internal quality control system of the credit rating agency in relation to credit rating activities;

(c) the effectiveness of measures and procedures instituted to ensure that any conflicts of interest are identified, eliminated or managed and disclosed; and

(d) the compliance and governance processes, including the efficiency of the review function referred to in point 9 of this Section.

Opinions of the independent members of administrative or supervisory board issued on the matters referred to in points (a) to (d) shall be presented to the board periodically and shall be made available to ESMA on request.

3. A credit rating agency shall establish adequate policies and procedures to ensure compliance with its obligations under this Regulation.

4. A credit rating agency shall have sound administrative and accounting procedures, internal control mechanisms, effective procedures for risk assessment, and effective control and safeguard arrangements for information processing systems.

Those internal control mechanisms shall be designed to secure compliance with decisions and procedures at all levels of the credit rating agency.

A credit rating agency shall implement and maintain decision-making procedures and organisational structures which clearly and in a documented manner specify reporting lines and allocate functions and responsibilities.

5. A credit rating agency shall establish and maintain a permanent and effective compliance function department (compliance function) which operates independently. The compliance function shall monitor and report on compliance of the credit rating agency and its employees with the credit rating agency's obligations under this Regulation. The compliance function shall:

(a) monitor and, on a regular basis, assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the measures and procedures put in place in accordance with point 3, and the actions taken to address any deficiencies in the credit rating agency's compliance with its obligations;

(b) advise and assist the managers, rating analysts, employees as well as any other natural person whose services are placed at the disposal or under the control of the credit rating agency or any person directly or indirectly linked to it by control who is responsible for carrying out credit rating activities, to comply with the credit rating agency's obligations under this Regulation.

6. In order to enable the compliance function to discharge its responsibilities properly and independently, a credit rating agency shall ensure that the following conditions are satisfied:

(a) the compliance function has the necessary authority, resources, expertise and access to all relevant information;

(b) a compliance officer is appointed and is responsible for the compliance function and for any reporting with regard to compliance required by point 3;

(c) the managers, rating analysts, employees and any other natural person whose services are placed at the disposal or under the control of the credit rating agency or any person directly or indirectly linked to it by control who is involved in the compliance function is not involved in the performance of credit rating activities they monitor;

(d) the compensation of the compliance officer is not linked to the business performance of the credit rating agency and is arranged so as to ensure the independence of his or her judgement.

The compliance officer shall ensure that any conflicts of interest relating to the persons placed at the disposal of the compliance function are properly identified and eliminated.

The compliance officer shall report regularly on the carrying out of his or her duties to senior management and the independent members of the administrative or supervisory board.

7. A credit rating agency shall establish appropriate and effective organisational and administrative arrangements to prevent, identify, eliminate or manage and disclose any conflicts of interest referred to in point 1 of Section B. It shall arrange for records to be kept of all significant threats to the independence of the credit rating activities, including those to the rules on rating analysts referred to in Section C, as well as the safeguards applied to mitigate those threats.

8. A credit rating agency shall employ appropriate systems, resources and procedures to ensure continuity and regularity in the performance of its credit rating activities.

9. A credit rating agency shall establish a review function responsible for periodically reviewing its methodologies, models and key rating assumptions, such as mathematical or correlation assumptions, and any significant changes or modifications thereto as well as the appropriateness of those methodologies, models and key rating assumptions where they are used or intended to be used for the assessment of new financial instruments.

That review function shall be independent of the business lines which are responsible for credit rating activities and report to the members of the administrative or supervisory board referred to in point 2 of this Section.

10. A credit rating agency shall monitor and evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of its systems, internal control mechanisms and arrangements established in accordance with this Regulation and take appropriate measures to address any deficiencies.

1. A credit rating agency shall identify, eliminate, or manage and disclose, clearly and prominently, any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may influence the analyses and judgments of its rating analysts, employees, or any other natural person whose services are placed at the disposal or under the control of the credit rating agency and who are directly involved in credit rating activities and persons approving credit ratings and rating outlooks.

2. A credit rating agency shall disclose to the public the names of the rated entities or related third parties from which it receives more than 5% of its annual revenue.

3. A credit rating agency shall not issue a credit rating or a rating outlook in any of the following circumstances, or shall, in the case of an existing credit rating or rating outlook, immediately disclose where the credit rating or rating outlook is potentially affected by the following:

(a) the credit rating agency or persons referred to in point 1, directly or indirectly owns financial instruments of the rated entity or a related third party or has any other direct or indirect ownership interest in that entity or party, other than holdings in diversified collective investment schemes, including managed funds such as pension funds or life insurance;

(aa) a shareholder or member of a credit rating agency holding 10% or more of either the capital or the voting rights of that credit rating agency or being otherwise in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of the credit rating agency, holds 10% or more of either the capital or the voting rights of the rated entity or of a related third party, or of any other ownership interest in that rated entity or third party, excluding holdings in diversified collective investment schemes and managed funds such as pension funds or life insurance, which do not put him in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of the scheme;

(b) the credit rating is issued with respect to the rated entity or a related third party directly or indirectly linked to the credit rating agency by control;

(ba) the credit rating is issued with respect to a rated entity or a related third party which holds 10% or more of either the capital or the voting rights of that credit rating agency;

(c) a person referred to in point 1 is a member of the administrative or supervisory board of the rated entity or a related third party; or

(ca) a shareholder or member of a credit rating agency holding 10% or more of either the capital or the voting rights of that credit rating agency or being otherwise in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of the credit rating agency, is a member of the administrative or supervisory board of the rated entity or a related third party;

(d) a rating analyst who participated in determining a credit rating, or a person who approved a credit rating, has had a relationship with the rated entity or a related third party which may cause a conflict of interests.

A credit rating agency shall also immediately assess whether there are grounds for re-rating or withdrawing the existing credit rating or rating outlook.

3a. A credit rating agency shall disclose where an existing credit rating or rating outlook is potentially affected by either of the following:

(a) a shareholder or member of a credit rating agency holding 5% or more of either the capital or the voting rights of that credit rating agency or being otherwise in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of the credit rating agency, holds 5% or more of either the capital or the voting rights of the rated entity or of a related third party, or of any other ownership interest in that rated entity or third party. This excludes holdings in diversified collective investment schemes and managed funds such as pension funds or life insurance, which do not put him in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of the scheme;

(b) a shareholder or member of a credit rating agency holding 5% or more of either the capital or the voting rights of that credit rating agency or being otherwise in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of the credit rating agency, is a member of the administrative or supervisory board of the rated entity or a related third party.

3b. Provided that the information is known or should be known by the credit rating agency, the obligations in point 3(aa), (ba) and (ca) and point 3a shall also relate to:

(a) indirect shareholders covered by Article 10 of Directive 2004/109/EC; and

(b) companies that control or exercise a dominant influence, directly or indirectly, on the credit rating agency, and which are covered by Article 10 of Directive 2004/109/EC.

3c. A credit rating agency shall ensure that fees charged to its clients for the provision of credit rating and ancillary services are not discriminatory and are based on actual costs. Fees charged for credit rating services shall not depend on the level of the credit rating issued by the credit rating agency or on any other result or outcome of the work performed.

4. Neither a credit rating agency nor any person holding, directly or indirectly, at least 5% of either the capital or voting rights of the credit rating agency or being otherwise in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of the credit rating agency shall provide consultancy or advisory services to the rated entity or a related third party regarding the corporate or legal structure, assets, liabilities or activities of that rated entity or related third party.

A credit rating agency may provide services other than issue of credit ratings (ancillary services). Ancillary services are not part of credit rating activities; they comprise market forecasts, estimates of economic trends, pricing analysis and other general data analysis as well as related distribution services.

A credit rating agency shall ensure that the provision of ancillary services does not present conflicts of interest with its credit rating activities and shall disclose in the final ratings reports any ancillary services provided for the rated entity or any related third party.

5. A credit rating agency shall ensure that rating analysts or persons who approve ratings do not make proposals or recommendations, either formally or informally, regarding the design of securitisation instruments on which the credit rating agency is expected to issue a credit rating.

6. A credit rating agency shall design its reporting and communication channels so as to ensure the independence of the persons referred to in point 1 from the other activities of the credit rating agency carried out on a commercial basis.

7. A credit rating agency shall arrange for adequate records and, where appropriate, audit trails of its credit rating activities to be kept. Those records shall include:

(a) for each credit rating and rating outlook decision, the identity of the rating analysts participating in the determination of the credit rating or rating outlook, the identity of the persons who have approved the credit rating or rating outlook, information as to whether the credit rating was solicited or unsolicited, and the date on which the credit rating action was taken;

(b) the account records relating to fees received from any rated entity or related third party or any user of ratings;

(c) the account records for each subscriber to the credit ratings or related services;

(d) the records documenting the established procedures and rating methodologies used by the credit rating agency to determine credit ratings and rating outlooks;

(e) the internal records and files, including non-public information and work papers, used to form the basis of any credit rating and rating outlook decision taken;

(f) credit analysis reports, credit assessment reports and private credit rating reports and internal records, including non-public information and work papers, used to form the basis of the opinions expressed in such reports;

(g) records of the procedures and measures implemented by the credit rating agency to comply with this Regulation; and

(h) copies of internal and external communications, including electronic communications, received and sent by the credit rating agency and its employees, that relate to credit rating activities.

8. Records and audit trails referred to in point 7 shall be kept at the premises of the registered credit rating agency for at least five years and be made available upon request to ESMA.

Where the registration of a credit rating agency is withdrawn, the records shall be kept for an additional term of at least three years.

9. Records which set out the respective rights and obligations of the credit rating agency and the rated entity or its related third parties under an agreement to provide credit rating services shall be retained for at least the duration of the relationship with that rated entity or its related third parties.

1. Rating analysts, employees of the credit rating agency as well as any other natural person whose services are placed at the disposal or under the control of the credit rating agency and who is directly involved in credit rating activities, and persons closely associated with them within the meaning of Article 1(2) of Directive 2004/72/EC <*>, shall not buy or sell or engage in any transaction in any financial instrument issued, guaranteed, or otherwise supported by any rated entity within their area of primary analytical responsibility other than holdings in diversified collective investment schemes, including managed funds such as pension funds or life insurance.

---

<*> Commission Directive 2004/72/EC of 29 April 2004 implementing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards accepted market practices, the definition of inside information in relation to derivatives on commodities, the drawing up of lists of insiders, the notification of managers' transactions and the notification of suspicious transactions (OJ L 162, 30.4.2004, p. 70).

2. No person referred to in point 1 shall participate in or otherwise influence the determination of a credit rating or rating outlook of any particular rated entity if that person:

(a) owns financial instruments of the rated entity, other than holdings in diversified collective investment schemes;

(b) owns financial instruments of any entity related to a rated entity, the ownership of which may cause or may be generally perceived as causing a conflict of interest, other than holdings in diversified collective investment schemes;

(c) has had a recent employment, business or other relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be generally perceived as causing a conflict of interest.

3. Credit rating agencies shall ensure that persons referred to in point 1:

(a) take all reasonable measures to protect property and records in possession of the credit rating agency from fraud, theft or misuse, taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business and the nature and range of their credit rating activities;

(b) do not disclose any information about credit ratings, possible future credit ratings or rating outlooks of the credit rating agency, except to the rated entity or a related third party;

(c) do not share confidential information entrusted to the credit rating agency with rating analysts and employees of any person directly or indirectly linked to it by control, as well as with any other natural person whose services are placed at the disposal or under the control of any person directly or indirectly linked to it by control, and who is not directly involved in the credit rating activities; and

(d) do not use or share confidential information for the purpose of trading financial instruments, or for any other purpose except the conduct of the credit rating activities.

4. Persons referred to in point 1 shall not solicit or accept money, gifts or favours from anyone with whom the credit rating agency does business.

5. If a person referred to in point 1 considers that any other such person has engaged in conduct that he or she considers to be illegal, he or she shall report such information immediately to the compliance officer without negative consequences to him or herself.

6. Where a rating analyst terminates his or her employment and joins a rated entity, which he or she has been involved in rating, or a financial firm, with which he or she has had dealings as part of his or her duties at the credit rating agency, the credit rating agency shall review the relevant work of the rating analyst over two years preceding his or her departure.

7. A person referred to in point 1 shall not take up a key management position with the rated entity or a related third party within six months of the issuing of a credit rating or rating outlook.

8. For the purposes of Article 7(4):

(a) credit rating agencies shall ensure that the lead rating analysts shall not be involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or a related third party for a period exceeding four years;

(b) credit rating agencies other than those appointed by an issuer or a related third party and all credit rating agencies issuing sovereign ratings shall ensure that:

(i) the rating analysts shall not be involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or a related third party for a period exceeding five years;

(ii) the persons approving credit ratings shall not be involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or a related third party for a period exceeding seven years.

The persons referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph shall not be involved in credit rating activities related to the rated entity or a related third party referred to in those points within two years of end of the periods set out in those points.

1. A credit rating agency shall ensure that any credit rating and rating outlook states clearly and prominently the name and job title of the lead rating analyst in a given credit rating activity and the name and position of the person primarily responsible for approving the credit rating or rating outlook.

2. A credit rating agency shall ensure that at least:

(a) all substantially material sources, including the rated entity or, where appropriate, a related third party, which were used to prepare the credit rating or rating outlook are indicated together with an indication as to whether the credit rating or rating outlook has been disclosed to that rated entity or related third party and amended following that disclosure before being issued;

(b) the principal methodology or version of methodology that was used in determining the rating is clearly indicated, with a reference to its comprehensive description; where the credit rating is based on more than one methodology, or where reference only to the principal methodology might cause investors to overlook other important aspects of the credit rating, including any significant adjustments and deviations, the credit rating agency shall explain this fact in the credit rating and indicate how the different methodologies or these other aspects are taken into account in the credit rating;

(c) the meaning of each rating category, the definition of default or recovery and any appropriate risk warning, including a sensitivity analysis of the relevant key rating assumptions, such as mathematical or correlation assumptions, accompanied by worst-case scenario credit ratings as well as best-case scenario credit ratings are explained;

(d) the date at which the credit rating was first released for distribution and when it was last updated including any rating outlooks is indicated clearly and prominently;

(e) information is given as to whether the credit rating concerns a newly issued financial instrument and whether the credit rating agency is rating the financial instrument for the first time; and

(f) in the case of a rating outlook, the time horizon is provided during which a change in the credit rating is expected.

When publishing credit ratings or rating outlooks, credit rating agencies shall include a reference to the historical default rates published by ESMA in a central repository in accordance with Article 11(2), together with an explanatory statement of the meaning of those default rates.

2a. A credit rating agency shall accompany the disclosure of rating methodologies, models and key rating assumptions with guidance which explains assumptions, parameters, limits and uncertainties surrounding the models and rating methodologies used in credit ratings, including simulations of stress scenarios undertaken by the credit rating agency when establishing the credit ratings, credit rating information on cash-flow analysis it has performed or is relying upon and, where applicable, an indication of any expected change in the credit rating. Such guidance shall be clear and easily comprehensible.

3. The credit rating agency shall inform the rated entity during working hours of the rated entity and at least a full working day before publication of the credit rating or the rating outlook. That information shall include the principal grounds on which the credit rating or rating outlook is based in order to give the rated entity an opportunity to draw attention of the credit rating agency to any factual errors.

4. A credit rating agency shall state clearly and prominently when disclosing credit ratings or rating outlooks any attributes and limitations of the credit rating or rating outlook. In particular, a credit rating agency shall prominently state when disclosing any credit rating or rating outlook whether it considers satisfactory the quality of information available on the rated entity and to what extent it has verified information provided to it by the rated entity or a related third party. If a credit rating or a rating outlook involves a type of entity or financial instrument for which historical data is limited, the credit rating agency shall make clear, in a prominent place, such limitations.

In a case where the lack of reliable data or the complexity of the structure of a new type of financial instrument or the quality of information available is not satisfactory or raises serious questions as to whether a credit rating agency can provide a credible credit rating, the credit rating agency shall refrain from issuing a credit rating or withdraw an existing rating.

5. When announcing a credit rating or a rating outlook, a credit rating agency shall explain in its press releases or reports the key elements underlying the credit rating or the rating outlook.

Where the information laid down in points 1, 2 and 4 would be disproportionate in relation to the length of the report distributed, it shall suffice to make clear and prominent reference in the report itself to the place where such disclosures can be directly and easily accessed, including a direct web link to the disclosure on an appropriate website of the credit rating agency.

6. A credit rating agency shall disclose on its website, and notify ESMA on an ongoing basis, information about all entities or debt instruments submitted to it for their initial review or for preliminary rating. Such disclosure shall be made whether or not issuers contract with the credit rating agency for a final rating.

1. Where a credit rating agency rates a securitisation instrument, it shall provide in the credit rating all information about loss and cash-flow analysis it has performed or is relying upon and an indication of any expected change in the credit rating.

2. A credit rating agency shall state what level of assessment it has performed concerning the due diligence processes carried out at the level of underlying financial instruments or other assets of securitisation instruments. The credit rating agency shall disclose whether it has undertaken any assessment of such due diligence processes or whether it has relied on a third-party assessment, indicating how the outcome of such assessment impacts on the credit rating.

1. Where a credit rating agency issues a sovereign rating or a related rating outlook, it shall simultaneously provide a detailed research report explaining all the assumptions, parameters, limits and uncertainties and any other information taken into account in determining that sovereign rating or rating outlook. That report shall be publicly available, clear and easily comprehensible.

2. A publicly available research report accompanying a change compared to the previous sovereign rating or related rating outlook shall include at least the following:

(a) a detailed evaluation of the changes to the quantitative assumption justifying the reasons for the rating change and their relative weight. The detailed evaluation should include a description of the following: per capita income, GDP Growth, inflation, fiscal balance, external balance, external debt, an indicator for economic development, an indicator for default and any other relevant factor taken into account. This should be complemented with the relative weight of each factor;

(b) a detailed evaluation of the changes to the qualitative assumption justifying the reasons for the rating change and their relative weight;

(c) a detailed description of the risks, limits and uncertainties related to the rating change; and

(d) a summary of minutes of the meeting of the rating committee that decided on the rating change.

3. Without prejudice to point 3 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, where a credit rating agency issues sovereign ratings or related rating outlooks, it shall publish them in accordance with Article 8a, after the close of business hours of regulated markets and at least one hour before their opening.

4. Without prejudice to point 5 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, in accordance with which, when announcing a credit rating, a credit rating agency is to explain in its press releases or reports the key elements underlying the credit rating and although national policies may serve as an element underlying a sovereign rating, policy recommendations, prescriptions or guidelines to rated entities, including States or regional or local authorities of States, shall not be part of sovereign ratings or rating outlooks.

A credit rating agency shall generally disclose the fact that it is registered in accordance with this Regulation and the following information:

1. any actual and potential conflicts of interest referred to in point 1 of Section B;

2. a list of its ancillary services;

3. the policy of the credit rating agency concerning the publication of credit ratings and other related communications including rating outlooks;

4. the general nature of its compensation arrangements;

5. the methodologies, and descriptions of models and key rating assumptions such as mathematical or correlation assumptions used in its credit rating activities as well as their material changes;

6. any material modification to its systems, resources or procedures; and

7. where relevant, its code of conduct.

A credit rating agency shall periodically disclose the following information:

1. every six months, data about the historical default rates of its rating categories, distinguishing between the main geographical areas of the issuers and whether the default rates of these categories have changed over time;

2. annually, the following information:

(a) list of fees charged to each client for individual credit ratings and any ancillary services;

(aa) its pricing policy, including the fees structure and pricing criteria in relation to credit ratings for different asset classes;

(b) a list of those clients of the credit rating agency whose contribution to the growth rate in the generation of revenue of the credit rating agency in the previous financial year exceeded the growth rate in the total revenues of the credit rating agency in that year by a factor of more than 1,5 times. Any such client shall be included on the list only where, in that year, it accounted for more than 0,25% of the worldwide total revenues of the credit rating agency at global level; and

(c) a list of credit ratings issued during the year, indicating the proportion of unsolicited credit ratings among them.

For the purposes of this point, «client» means an entity, its subsidiaries, and associated entities in which the entity has holdings of more than 20%, as well as any other entities in respect of which it has negotiated the structuring of a debt issue on behalf of a client and where a fee was paid, directly or indirectly, to the credit rating agency for the rating of that debt issue.

A credit rating agency shall make available annually the following information:

1. detailed information on legal structure and ownership of the credit rating agency, including information on holdings within the meaning of Articles 9 and 10 of Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market <*>;

---

<*> OJ L 390, 31.12.2004, p. 38.

2. a description of the internal control mechanisms ensuring quality of its credit rating activities;

3. statistics on the allocation of its staff to new credit ratings, credit rating reviews, methodology or model appraisal and senior management, and on the allocation of staff to rating activities with regard to the different asset classes (corporate — structured finance — sovereign);

4. a description of its record-keeping policy;

5. the outcome of the annual internal review of its independent compliance function;

6. a description of its management and rating analyst rotation policy;

7. financial information on the revenue of the credit rating agency, including total turnover, divided into fees from credit rating and ancillary services with a comprehensive description of each, including the revenues generated from ancillary services provided to clients of credit rating services and the allocation of fees to credit ratings of different asset classes. Information on total turnover shall also include a geographical allocation of that turnover to revenues generated in the Union and revenues worldwide;

8. a governance statement within the meaning of Article 46a(1) of Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 on the annual accounts of certain types of companies <*>. For the purposes of that statement, the information referred to in Article 46a(1)(d) of that Directive shall be provided by the credit rating agency irrespective of whether it is subject to Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids <**>.

---

<*> OJ L 222, 14.8.1978, p. 11.

<**> OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p. 12.

1. Full name of the credit rating agency, address of the registered office within the Union

2. Name and contact details of a contact person and of the compliance officer

3. Legal status

4. Class of credit ratings for which the credit rating agency is applying to be registered

5. Ownership structure

6. Organisational structure and corporate governance

7. Financial resources to perform credit rating activities

8. Staffing of credit rating agency and its expertise

9. Information regarding subsidiaries of credit rating agency

10. Description of the procedures and methodologies used to issue and review credit ratings

11. Policies and procedures to identify, manage and disclose any conflicts of interests

12. Information regarding rating analysts

13. Compensation and performance evaluation arrangements

14. Services other than credit rating activities, which the credit rating agency intends to provide

15. Programme of operations, including indications of where the main business activities are expected to be carried out, branches to be established, and setting out the type of business envisaged

16. Documents and detailed information related to the expected use of endorsement

17. Documents and detailed information related to the expected outsourcing arrangements including information on entities assuming outsourcing functions.

1. The credit rating agency infringes Article 4(3) by endorsing a credit rating issued in a third country without complying with the conditions set out in that paragraph, unless the reason for that infringement is outside the credit rating agency's knowledge or control.

2. The credit rating agency infringes the second subparagraph of Article 4(4) by using the endorsement of a credit rating issued in a third country with the intention of avoiding the requirements of this Regulation.

3. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 1 of Section A of Annex I, by not establishing an administrative or a supervisory board.

4. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by not ensuring that its business interest does not impair the independence or accuracy of the credit rating activities.

5. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by appointing senior management which are not of good repute, sufficiently skilled or experienced, or cannot ensure the sound and prudent management of the credit rating agency.

6. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the third paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by not appointing the required number of independent members of its administrative or supervisory board.

7. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the fourth paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by setting up a compensation system for the independent members of its administrative or supervisory board which is linked to the business performance of the credit rating agency or is not arranged to ensure the independence of their judgment; or by setting a term of office for the independent members of its administrative or supervisory board for a period exceeding five years or for a renewable term; or by dismissing an independent member of the administrative or supervisory board other than in the case of misconduct or professional underperformance.

8. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the fifth paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by appointing members of the administrative or supervisory board that do not have sufficient expertise in financial services; or, where the credit rating agency issues credit ratings of securitisation instruments, by not appointing at least one independent member and one other member of the board who has in-depth knowledge and experience at senior level of the markets in securitisation instruments.

9. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the sixth paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by not ensuring that the independent members of the administrative or supervisory board perform the tasks of monitoring any of the matters referred to in the sixth paragraph of that point.

10. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the seventh paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by not ensuring that the independent members of the administrative or supervisory board present their opinions on the matters referred to in the sixth paragraph of that point to the board periodically or make those opinions available to ESMA on request.

11. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 3 of Section A of Annex I, by not establishing adequate policies or procedures to ensure compliance with its obligations under this Regulation.

12. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 4 of Section A of Annex I, by not having sound administrative or accounting procedures, internal control mechanisms, effective procedures for risk assessment, or effective control or safeguard arrangements for information processing systems; or by not implementing or maintaining decision-making procedures or organisational structures as required by that point.

13. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 5 of Section A of Annex I, by not establishing or maintaining a permanent and effective compliance function department (compliance function) which operates independently.

14. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 6 of Section A of Annex I, by not ensuring that the conditions enabling the compliance function to discharge its responsibilities properly or independently, as set out in the first paragraph of that point, are satisfied.

15. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 7 of Section A of Annex I, by not establishing appropriate and effective organisational or administrative arrangements to prevent, identify, eliminate or manage and disclose any conflicts of interest referred to in point 1 of Section B of Annex I, or by not arranging for records to be kept of all significant threats to the independence of the credit rating activities, including those to the rules on rating analysts referred to in Section C of Annex I, as well as the safeguards applied to mitigate those threats.

16. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 8 of Section A of Annex I, by not employing appropriate systems, resources or procedures to ensure continuity and regularity in the performance of its credit rating activities.

17. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 9 of Section A of Annex I, by not establishing a review function that:

(a) is responsible for periodically reviewing its methodologies, models and key rating assumptions or any significant changes or modifications thereto, or the appropriateness of those methodologies, models or key rating assumptions where they are used or intended to be used for the assessment of new financial instruments;

(b) is independent of the business lines which are responsible for credit rating activities; or

(c) reports to the members of the administrative or supervisory board.

18. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 10 of Section A of Annex I, by not monitoring or evaluating the adequacy and effectiveness of its systems, internal control mechanisms and arrangements established in accordance with this Regulation or by not taking appropriate measures to address any deficiencies.

19. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 1 of Section B of Annex I, by not identifying, eliminating, or managing and disclosing, clearly or prominently, any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may influence the analyses or judgments of its rating analysts, employees, or any other natural person whose services are placed at the disposal or under the control of the credit rating agency and who are directly involved in credit rating activities or persons approving credit ratings and rating outlooks.

20. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 3 of Section B of Annex I, by issuing a credit rating or rating outlook in any of the circumstances set out in the first paragraph of that point or, in the case of an existing credit rating or rating outlook, by not disclosing immediately that the credit rating or rating outlook is potentially affected by those circumstances.

20a. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 3a of Section B of Annex I, by not disclosing that an existing credit rating or rating outlook is potentially affected by any of the circumstances set out in letters (a) and (b) of that point.

21. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 3 of Section B of Annex I, by not immediately assessing whether there are grounds for re-rating or withdrawing an existing credit rating or rating outlook.

22. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 4 of Section B of Annex I, by rating entities where the credit rating agency itself or any person holding, directly or indirectly, at least 5% of either the capital or the voting rights of the credit rating agency, or being otherwise in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of the credit rating agency, provides consultancy or advisory services to that rated entity or a related third party regarding the corporate or legal structure, assets, liabilities or activities of that rated entity or related third party.

22a. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6a(1) when one of its shareholders or members holding at least 5% of the capital or the voting rights in that credit rating agency or in a company which has the power to exercise control or a dominant influence over that credit rating agency, is in breach of one of the prohibitions set out in points (a) to (e) of that paragraph, with the exception of that set out in point (a) for holdings in diversified collective investment schemes, including managed funds such as pension funds or life insurance, provided that the holdings in such schemes do not put the shareholder or member of a credit rating agency in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of those schemes.

23. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first part of the third paragraph of point 4 of Section B of Annex I, by not ensuring that the provision of an ancillary service does not present a conflict of interest with its credit rating activity.

24. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 5 of Section B of Annex I, by not ensuring that rating analysts or persons who approve ratings do not make proposals or recommendations regarding the design of securitisation instruments on which the credit rating agency is expected to issue a credit rating.

25. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 6 of Section B of Annex I, by not designing its reporting or communication channels so as to ensure the independence of the persons referred to in point 1 of Section B from the other activities of the credit rating agency carried out on a commercial basis.

26. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 8 of Section B of Annex I, by not keeping the records for a term of at least three years once its registration is withdrawn.

26a. The credit rating agency which entered into a contract for the issuing of credit ratings on re-securitisations infringes Article 6b(1) by issuing credit ratings on new re-securitisations with underlying assets from the same originator for a period exceeding four years.

26b. The credit rating agency which entered into a contract for the issuing of credit ratings on re-securitisations infringes Article 6b(3) by entering into a new contract for the issuing of credit ratings on re-securitisations with underlying assets from the same originator for a period equal to the duration of the expired contract referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 6b but not exceeding four years.

27. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(1) by not ensuring that rating analysts, its employees or any other natural person whose services are placed at its disposal or under its control and who are directly involved in credit rating activities have appropriate knowledge and experience for the duties assigned.

28. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(2) by not ensuring that a person referred to in Article 7(1) does not initiate or participate in negotiations regarding fees or payments with any rated entity, related third party or any person directly or indirectly linked to the rated entity by control.

29. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 3(a) of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section takes all reasonable measures to protect property or records in possession of the credit rating agency from fraud, theft or misuse, taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of its credit rating activities.

30. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 5 of Section C of Annex I, by imposing negative consequences on a person referred to in point 1 of that Section where that person reports information to the compliance officer to the effect that another person as referred to in point 1 of that Section has engaged in conduct that he or she considers to be illegal.

31. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 6 of Section C of Annex I, by not reviewing the relevant work of a rating analyst over two years preceding his or her departure, where the rating analyst terminates his or her employment and joins a rated entity which he or she has been involved in rating or a financial firm, with which he or she has had dealings as part of his or her duties at the credit rating agency.

32. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 1 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in that point does not buy, sell or engage in a transaction in any financial instrument referred to in that point.

33. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 2 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not participate in or otherwise influence the determination of a credit rating or rating outlook as set out in point 2 of that Section.

34. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with points (b), (c) and (d) of point 3 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not disclose or use or share information, as referred to in those points.

35. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 4 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not solicit or accept money, gifts or favours from anyone with whom the credit rating agency does business.

36. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 7 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not take up a key management position with the rated entity or a related third party within six months of the issuing of a credit rating or rating outlook.

37. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (a) of the first paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that the lead rating analyst is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or its related third parties for a period exceeding four years.

38. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (i) of point (b) of the first paragraph of point 8 Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that, where it provides unsolicited credit ratings or sovereign ratings, a rating analyst is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or a related third party for a period exceeding five years.

39. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (ii) of point (b) of the first paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that, where it provides unsolicited credit ratings or sovereign ratings, a person approving credit ratings is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or a related third party for a period exceeding seven years.

40. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first paragraph of that point is not involved in credit rating activities related to the rated entity or a related third party referred to in those points within two years of the end of the periods set out in those points.

41. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(5) by introducing compensation or performance evaluation contingent on the amount of revenue that the credit rating agency derives from the rated entities or related third parties.

42. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(2) by not adopting, implementing or enforcing adequate measures to ensure that the credit ratings and rating outlooks it issues are based on a thorough analysis of all the information that is available to it and that is relevant to its analysis according to the applicable rating methodologies.

42a. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(2) by using information falling outside the scope of Article 8(2).

42b. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(2a) by issuing changes in credit ratings that do not comply with its published rating methodologies.

43. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(3) by not using rating methodologies that are rigorous, systematic, continuous and subject to validation based on historical experience, including back-testing.

44. The credit rating agency infringes the first subparagraph of Article 8(4) by refusing to issue a credit rating of an entity or a financial instrument because a portion of the entity or the financial instrument had been previously rated by another credit rating agency.

45. The credit rating agency infringes the second subparagraph of Article 8(4) by not recording all instances where in its credit rating process it departs from existing credit ratings prepared by another credit rating agency with respect to underlying assets or securitisation instruments or by not providing a justification for the differing assessment.

46. The credit rating agency infringes the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 8(5) by not monitoring its credit ratings other than sovereign ratings or by not reviewing its credit ratings other than sovereign ratings or rating methodologies on an ongoing basis or at least annually.

46a. The credit rating agency infringes the second subparagraph of Article 8(5), in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 8(5), by not monitoring its sovereign ratings or by not reviewing its sovereign ratings on an ongoing basis or at least every six months.

47. The credit rating agency infringes the second sentence of Article 8(5) by not establishing internal arrangements to monitor the impact of changes in macroeconomic or financial market conditions on credit ratings.

48. The credit rating agency infringes point (b) of Article 8(6), where methodologies, models or key rating assumptions used in credit rating activities are changed, by not reviewing the affected credit ratings in accordance with that point, or by not placing those ratings under observation in the meantime.

49. The credit rating agency infringes point (c) of Article 8(6) by not re-rating a credit rating that has been based on methodologies, models or key rating assumptions that are changed where the overall combined effect of those changes affects that credit rating.

49a. The credit rating agency infringes point (c) of Article 8(6), in conjunction with point (c) of Article 8(7), by not re-rating a credit rating where errors in the rating methodologies or in their application affect that credit rating.

50. The credit rating agency infringes Article 9 by undertaking the outsourcing of important operational functions in such a way as to impair materially the quality of the credit rating agency's internal control or the ability of ESMA to supervise the credit rating agency's compliance with obligations under this Regulation.

51. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 4 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, by issuing a credit rating or not withdrawing an existing rating in a case where the lack of reliable data or the complexity of the structure of a new type of financial instrument or the quality of information available is not satisfactory or raises serious questions as to whether the credit rating agency can provide a credible credit rating.

52. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(6) by using the name of ESMA or any competent authority in such a way that would indicate or suggest endorsement or approval by ESMA or any competent authority of the credit ratings or any credit rating activities of the credit rating agency.

53. The credit rating agency infringes Article 13 by charging a fee for the information provided in accordance with Articles 8 to 12.

54. The credit rating agency, where it is a legal person established in the Union, infringes Article 14(1) by not applying for registration for the purposes of Article 2(1).

55. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8a(3) by not publishing on its website, or by not submitting to ESMA on an annual basis, in accordance with point 3 of Part III of Section D of Annex I, a calendar at the end of December for the following 12 months, setting a maximum of three dates that fall on a Friday for the publication of unsolicited sovereign ratings and related rating outlooks and setting dates that fall on a Friday for the publication of solicited sovereign ratings and related rating outlooks.

56. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8a(4) by deviating from the announced calendar where this is not necessary to fulfil its obligations under Article 8(2), Article 10(1) or Article 11(1) or by not providing a detailed explanation of the reasons for the deviation from the announced calendar.

57. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 3 of Part III of Section D of Annex I, by publishing a sovereign rating or a related rating outlook during business hours of regulated markets or less than one hour before their opening.

58. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 4 of Part III of Section D of Annex I, by including policy recommendations, prescriptions or guidelines to rated entities, including States or regional or local authorities of States, as part of a sovereign rating or a related rating outlook.

59. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8a(2) by basing its public communications relating to changes in sovereign ratings, and which are not credit ratings, rating outlooks or accompanying press releases, as referred to in point 5 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, on information within the sphere of the rated entity, where such information has been disclosed without the consent of the rated entity, unless it is available from generally accessible sources or unless there are no legitimate reasons for the rated entity not to give its consent to the disclosure of the information.

60. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8a(1) by not issuing individual publicly available country reports when announcing the revision of a given group of countries.

61. The credit rating agency infringes point 1 of Part III of Section D of Annex I by issuing a sovereign rating or a related rating outlook without simultaneously providing a detailed research report explaining all the assumptions, parameters, limits and uncertainties and any other information taken into account in determining that sovereign rating or rating outlook or by not making that report publicly available, clear and easily comprehensible.

62. The credit rating agency infringes point 2 of Part III of Section D of Annex I by not issuing a publicly available research report accompanying a change compared to the previous sovereign rating or related rating outlook or by not including in that report at least the information referred to in point 2(a) to (d) of Part III of Section D of Annex I.

1. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 7 of Section B of Annex I, by not arranging for records or audit trails of its credit rating activities as required by those provisions.

2. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 8 of Section B of Annex I, by not keeping the records or audit trails referred to in point 7 of that Section at its premises for at least five years or by not making available those records or audit trails to ESMA upon request.

3. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 9 of Section B of Annex I, by not retaining records which set out the respective rights and obligations of the credit rating agency or the rated entity or its related third parties under an agreement to provide credit rating services for the duration of the relationship with that rated entity or its related third party.

3a. The credit rating agency infringes the third subparagraph of Article 14(3) by not notifying ESMA of the intended material changes to the existing rating methodologies, models or key rating assumptions or of the proposed new rating methodologies, models or key rating assumptions when it publishes the rating methodologies on its website in accordance with Article 8(5a).

3b. The credit rating agency infringes the first subparagraph of Article 8(5a) by not publishing on its website the proposed new rating methodologies or the proposed material changes to the rating methodologies that could have an impact on a credit rating together with an explanation of the reasons for and the implications of the changes.

3c. The credit rating agency infringes point (a) of Article 8(7) by not notifying ESMA of discovered errors in its rating methodologies or in their application or by not explaining their impact on its credit ratings, including the need to review its issued credit ratings.

4. The credit rating agency infringes Article 11(2) by not making available the required information or by not providing that information in the required format as referred to in that paragraph.

4a. The credit rating agency infringes Article 11a(1) by not making available the required information or by not providing that information in the required format as referred to in that paragraph.

5. The credit rating agency infringes Article 11(3), in conjunction with point 2 of Part I of Section E of Annex I, by not providing to ESMA a list of its ancillary services.

6. The credit rating agency infringes the second subparagraph of Article 14(3) by not notifying ESMA of any material changes to the conditions for initial registration in accordance with that subparagraph.

7. The credit rating agency infringes Article 23b(1) by failing to provide information in response to a decision requiring information pursuant to Article 23b(3), or by providing incorrect or misleading information in response to a simple request for information or a decision.

8. The credit rating agency infringes point (c) of Article 23c(1) by failing to provide an explanation, or by providing an incorrect or misleading explanation, on facts or documents related to to the subject matter and purpose of an inspection.

1. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 2 of Section B of Annex I, by not disclosing to the public the names of the rated entities or related third parties from which it receives more than 5% of its annual revenue.

2. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the second part of the third paragraph of point 4 of Section B of Annex I, by not disclosing in the final rating report an ancillary service provided for the rated entity or any related third party.

3. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(1) by not disclosing to the public the methodologies, models or key rating assumptions it uses in its credit rating activities as described in point 5 of Part I of Section E of Annex I.

4. The credit rating agency infringes point (a) of Article 8(6), where methodologies, models or key rating assumptions used in credit rating activities are changed, by not disclosing immediately, or by disclosing and not using the same means of communication as used for the distribution of the affected credit ratings, the likely scope of affected credit ratings.

4a. The credit rating agency infringes point (aa) of Article 8(6), where it intends to use new rating methodologies, by not informing ESMA or by not publishing immediately on its website the results of the consultation and those new rating methodologies together with a detailed explanation thereof and their date of application.

4b. The credit rating agency infringes point (a) of Article 8(7) by not notifying affected rated entities of discovered errors in its rating methodologies or in their application, or by not explaining the impact on its credit ratings, including the need to review its issued credit ratings.

4c. The credit rating agency infringes point (b) of Article 8(7) by not publishing on its website discovered errors in its rating methodologies or in their application where such errors have an impact on the credit rating agency's credit ratings.

5. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(1) by not disclosing on a non-selective basis or in a timely manner a decision to discontinue a credit rating, including full reasons for the decision.

6. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 1 or 2, the first paragraph of point 4 or points 5 or 6, of Part I of Section D of Annex I, or Parts II or III of Section D of Annex I, by not providing the information as required by those provisions when presenting a credit rating or a rating outlook.

7. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 3 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, by not informing the rated entity during working hours of the rated entity and at least a full working day before publication of the credit rating or the rating outlook.

8. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(3) by not ensuring that rating categories that are attributed to securitisation instruments are clearly differentiated using an additional symbol which distinguishes them from rating categories used for any other entities, financial instruments or financial obligations.

9. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(4) by not disclosing its policies or procedures regarding unsolicited credit ratings.

10. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(5) by not providing the information as required by that paragraph when issuing an unsolicited credit rating or by not identifying an unsolicited credit rating as such.

11. The credit rating agency infringes Article 11(1) by not fully disclosing or immediately updating information relating to the matters set out in Part I of Section E of Annex I.

The following coefficients shall be applicable in a cumulative way to the basic amounts referred to in Article 36a(2) on the basis of each of the following aggravating and mitigating factors:

1. If the infringement has been committed repeatedly, for every time it has been repeated, an additional coefficient of 1,1 shall apply.

2. If the infringement has been committed for more than six months, a coefficient of 1,5 shall apply.

3. If the infringement has revealed systemic weaknesses in the organisation of the credit rating agency, in particular in its procedures, management systems or internal controls, a coefficient of 2,2 shall apply.

4. If the infringement has had a negative impact on the quality of the ratings rated by the credit rating agency concerned, a coefficient of 1,5 shall apply.

5. If the infringement has been committed intentionally, a coefficient of 2 shall apply.

6. If no remedial action has been taken since the breach has been identified, a coefficient of 1,7 shall apply.

7. If the credit rating agency's senior management has not cooperated with ESMA in carrying out its investigations, a coefficient of 1,5 shall apply.

1. If the infringement relates to a breach listed in Section II or III of Annex III and has been committed for fewer than 10 working days, a coefficient of 0,9 shall apply.

2. If the credit rating agency's senior management can demonstrate that they have taken all the necessary measures to prevent the infringement, a coefficient of 0,7 shall apply.

3. If the credit rating agency has brought quickly, effectively and completely the infringement to ESMA's attention, a coefficient of 0,4 shall apply.

4. If the credit rating agency has voluntarily taken measures to ensure that similar infringement cannot be committed in the future, a coefficient of 0,6 shall apply.

---