Статус Мирного договора с Японией (Сан-Франциско, 8 сентября 1951 года) [рус., англ.]

[неофициальный перевод]

СТАТУС МИРНОГО ДОГОВОРА С ЯПОНИЕЙ (САН-ФРАНЦИСКО, 8 СЕНТЯБРЯ 1951 ГОДА)

(последние изменения произошли 11 августа 1977 года)

Вступление в силу: 28.04.1952

TREATY OF PEACE WITH JAPAN San Francisco, 8 September 1951

Date of most recent action: August 11, 1977

Done: San Francisco September 8, 1951

Opened For Signature:

Entry into Force: April 28, 1952

Upon deposit of ratifications by Japan and by a majority, including the United States as the principal occupying power, of the following states, namely Australia, Canada, Ceylon, France, Indonesia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Pakistan, the Philippines, the United Kingdom and the United States (Art. 23(a)). Subsequent ratifications on date of deposit (Art. 23(b)).

Note: The Treaty of Peace with Japan, in accordance with the provisions of Article 23(a) thereof, entered into force on April 28, 1952, at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, between the Governments of Argentina, Australia, Canada, France, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America, and Japan.

Legend: (no mark) = ratification; a = accession; d = succession; c = acceptance; p = approval; h = adherence

Notes

<1> The instrument of ratification by the Government of Ecuador contained the following declarations:

«El Gobierno del Ecuador deja expresa constancia por la presente Declaracion, en lo referente a las disposiciones de los Articulos 2 y 3 del Tratado, en cuanto pudieren significar el desmembramiento de territorios que hubieren pertenecido al Japon en virtud de titulos juridicos suficientes y de conformidad con el Derecho Internacional que solo reconoce la aplicacion de los principios juridicos y pacificos que rigen singularmente dentro del sistema interamericano para la solucion de los problemas territoriales.»

Finalmente declara que los acuerdos celebrados entre las Grandes Potencias en las Conferencias realizadas durante la guerra y despues de ella, no podran ser obligatorios para el Ecuador sino en virtud de su aceptacion.»

<2> The instrument of ratification by the Government of El Salvador contained the following declarations:

«I) El Salvador no acepta ni ratifica los compromisos que otros Estados puedan haber contraido con respecto a la transferencia o final disposicion de los territorios enumerados en el articulo Segundo del Tratado de Paz con el Japon, en todos aquellos casos en que no se haya consultado y acatado la voluntad libremente expresada por las poblaciones afectadas. Esta reserva se aplica a la transferencia de las Islas Kuriles, de una parte de la Isla Sajaline (Sakhalin) y a cualquier otro caso analogo, incluyendo ademas todo compromiso sobre la Isla de Formosa; y»

«II) No podra tener efecto alguno en El Salvador, debido a que son contrarias a su Constitucion Politica, las disposiciones del Articulo XIV del Tratado de Paz con el Japon que autorizan la confiscacion de bienes de personas naturales o juridicas japonesas.»

<3> The Royal Netherlands Embassy in Washington transmitted to the Department of State a diplomatic note, dated October 6, 2010, which reads in pertinent part as follows:

«The Kingdom of the Netherlands currently consists of three parts: the Netherlands, the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba. The Netherlands Antilles consists of the islands of Curaçao , Sint Maarten, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba.»

«With effect from 10 October 2010, the Netherlands Antilles will cease to exist as a part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. From that date onwards, the Kingdom will consist of four parts: the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten. Curaçao and Sint Maarten will enjoy internal self-government within the Kingdom, as Aruba and, up to 10 October 2010, the Netherlands Antilles do.»

«These changes constitute a modification of the internal constitutional relations within the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The Kingdom of the Netherlands will accordingly remain the subject of international law with which agreements are concluded. The modification of the structure of the Kingdom will therefore not affect the validity of the international agreements ratified by the Kingdom for the Netherlands Antilles; these agreements will continue to apply to Curaçao and Sint Maarten.»

«The other islands that have until now formed part of the Netherlands Antilles — Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba — will become part of the Netherlands, thus constituting „the Caribbean part of the Netherlands“. The agreements that now apply to the Netherlands Antilles will also continue to apply to these islands; however, the Government of the Netherlands will now be responsible for implementing these agreements.»

Department of State,

Washington,

<4> The instrument of ratification by the Government of the United States of America contained the following declaration:

«As part of such advice and consent the Senate states that nothing the treaty contains is deemed to diminish or prejudice, in favor of the Soviet Union, the right, title, and interest of Japan, or the Allied Powers as defined in said treaty, in and to South Sakhalin and its adjacent islands, the Kurile Islands, the Habomai Islands, the island of Shikotan, or any other territory, rights, or interests possessed by Japan on December 7, 1941, or to confer any right, title, or benefit therein or thereto on the Soviet Union; and also that nothing in the said treaty, or the advice and consent of the Senate to the ratification thereof, implies recognition on the part of the United States of the provisions in favor of the Soviet Union contained in the so-called „Yalta agreement“ regarding Japan of February 11, 1945.»