Статус Протокола о борьбе с незаконными актами, направленными против безопасности стационарных платформ, расположенных на континентальном шельфе (SUA PROT) (Рим, 10 марта 1988 года) [рус., англ.]
Актуально на 09.11.2026.
Как цитировать: <Статус Протокола о борьбе с незаконными актами, направленными против безопасности стационарных платформ, расположенных на континентальном шельфе (SUA PROT) (Рим, 10 марта 1988 года)> [рус., англ.]. https://bukva.ai/docs/status-protokola-o-borbe-s-nezakonnymi-aktami-2
СТАТУС ПРОТОКОЛА О БОРЬБЕ С НЕЗАКОННЫМИ АКТАМИ, НАПРАВЛЕННЫМИ ПРОТИВ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ СТАЦИОНАРНЫХ ПЛАТФОРМ, РАСПОЛОЖЕННЫХ НА КОНТИНЕНТАЛЬНОМ ШЕЛЬФЕ (SUA PROT) (РИМ, 10 МАРТА 1988 ГОДА)
(по состоянию на 9 декабря 2025 года)
I. Подписи
II. Договаривающиеся государства
| Дата сдачи на хранение грамоты | Дата вступления в силу | |
|---|---|---|
| Австралия (присоединение) | 19.02.1993 | 20.05.1993 |
| Австрия (присоединение) | 28.12.1989 | 01.03.1992 |
| Азербайджан (присоединение) | 26.01.2004 | 25.04.2004 |
| Албания (присоединение) | 19.06.2002 | 17.09.2002 |
| Алжир (присоединение) | 30.06.2006 | 28.09.2006 |
| Андорра (присоединение) <1> | 17.07.2006 | 15.10.2006 |
| Антигуа и Барбуда (присоединение) | 12.10.2009 | 10.01.2010 |
| Аргентина (ратификация) | 26.11.2003 | 24.02.2004 |
| Армения (присоединение) | 08.06.2005 | 06.09.2005 |
| Афганистан (присоединение) | 23.09.2003 | 22.12.2003 |
| Багамские Острова (присоединение) | 25.10.2005 | 23.01.2006 |
| Бангладеш (присоединение) | 09.06.2005 | 07.09.2005 |
| Барбадос (присоединение) | 06.05.1994 | 04.08.1994 |
| Бахрейн (присоединение) | 21.10.2005 | 19.01.2006 |
| Беларусь (присоединение) | 04.12.2002 | 04.03.2003 |
| Бельгия (присоединение) | 11.04.2005 | 10.07.2005 |
| Бенин (присоединение) | 31.08.2006 | 29.11.2006 |
| Болгария (ратификация) | 08.07.1999 | 06.10.1999 |
| Боливия (Многонациональное государство) (присоединение) | 13.02.2002 | 14.05.2002 |
| Босния и Герцеговина (присоединение) | 28.07.2003 | 26.10.2003 |
| Ботсвана (присоединение) | 14.09.2000 | 13.12.2000 |
| Бразилия (ратификация) <1> | 25.10.2005 | 23.01.2006 |
| Бруней-Даруссалам (ратификация) | 04.12.2003 | 03.03.2004 |
| Буркина-Фасо (присоединение) | 14.01.2004 | 13.04.2004 |
| Вануату (присоединение) | 18.02.1999 | 19.05.1999 |
| Венгрия (ратификация) | 09.11.1989 | 01.03.1992 |
| Вьетнам (присоединение) | 12.07.2002 | 10.10.2002 |
| Гайана (присоединение) | 30.01.2003 | 30.04.2003 |
| Гана (присоединение) | 01.11.2002 | 30.01.2003 |
| Гватемала (присоединение) | 26.08.2009 | 24.11.2009 |
| Гвинея (присоединение) | 01.02.2005 | 02.05.2005 |
| Гвинея-Бисау (присоединение) | 14.10.2008 | 12.01.2009 |
| Германия (присоединение) <3> | 06.11.1990 | 01.03.1992 |
| Гондурас (присоединение) | 17.05.2005 | 15.08.2005 |
| Гренада (присоединение) | 09.01.2002 | 09.04.2002 |
| Греция (ратификация) | 11.06.1993 | 09.09.1993 |
| Грузия (присоединение) | 11.08.2006 | 09.11.2006 |
| Дания (ратификация) <1> | 25.08.1995 | 23.11.1995 |
| Джибути (присоединение) | 09.06.2004 | 07.09.2004 |
| Доминика (присоединение) | 12.10.2004 | 10.01.2005 |
| Доминиканская Республика (присоединение) | 12.08.2009 | 10.11.2009 |
| Египет (ратификация) <1> | 08.01.1993 | 08.04.1993 |
| Израиль (ратификация) <1> | 06.01.2009 | 06.04.2009 |
| Индия (присоединение) | 15.10.1999 | 13.01.2000 |
| Иордания (присоединение) | 02.07.2004 | 30.09.2004 |
| Ирак (ратификация) | 08.08.2023 | 06.11.2023 |
| Иран (Исламская Республика) (присоединение) <1> | 30.10.2009 | 28.01.2010 |
| Ирландия (присоединение) | 10.09.2004 | 09.12.2004 |
| Исландия (присоединение) | 28.05.2002 | 26.08.2002 |
| Испания (ратификация) | 07.07.1989 | 01.03.1992 |
| Италия (ратификация) | 26.01.1990 | 01.03.1992 |
| Йемен (присоединение) | 30.06.2000 | 28.09.2000 |
| Кабо-Верде (присоединение) | 03.01.2003 | 03.04.2003 |
| Казахстан (присоединение) | 24.11.2003 | 22.02.2004 |
| Камбоджа (присоединение) | 18.08.2006 | 16.11.2006 |
| Канада (ратификация) <2> | 18.06.1993 | 16.09.1993 |
| Катар (присоединение) | 18.09.2003 | 17.12.2003 |
| Кения (присоединение) | 21.01.2002 | 21.04.2002 |
| Кипр (присоединение) | 02.02.2000 | 02.05.2000 |
| Кирибати (присоединение) | 17.11.2005 | 16.02.2006 |
| Китай (ратификация) <1>, <6> | 20.08.1991 | 01.03.1992 |
| Коморские Острова (присоединение) | 06.03.2008 | 04.06.2008 |
| Конго (присоединение) | 28.05.2015 | 26.08.2015 |
| Коста-Рика (ратификация) | 25.03.2003 | 23.06.2003 |
| Кот-д'Ивуар (присоединение) | 23.03.2012 | 21.06.2012 |
| Куба (присоединение) <1> | 20.11.2001 | 18.02.2002 |
| Кувейт (присоединение) | 30.06.2003 | 28.09.2003 |
| Лаосская Народно-Демократическая Республика (присоединение) | 20.03.2012 | 18.06.2012 |
| Латвия (присоединение) | 04.12.2002 | 04.03.2003 |
| Лесото (присоединение) | 25.06.2013 | 23.09.2013 |
| Либерия (ратификация) | 05.10.1995 | 03.01.1996 |
| Ливан (присоединение) | 16.12.1994 | 16.03.1995 |
| Ливия (присоединение) | 08.08.2002 | 06.11.2002 |
| Литва (присоединение) | 30.01.2003 | 30.04.2003 |
| Лихтенштейн (присоединение) | 08.11.2002 | 06.02.2003 |
| Люксембург (присоединение) | 05.01.2011 | 05.04.2011 |
| Маврикий (присоединение) | 03.08.2004 | 01.11.2004 |
| Мавритания (присоединение) | 17.01.2008 | 16.04.2008 |
| Мадагаскар (присоединение) | 15.09.2006 | 14.12.2006 |
| Малави (присоединение) | 10.01.2014 | 10.04.2014 |
| Мали (присоединение) | 29.04.2002 | 28.07.2002 |
| Мальдивы (присоединение) | 25.02.2014 | 26.05.2014 |
| Мальта (присоединение) | 20.11.2001 | 18.02.2002 |
| Марокко (ратификация) | 08.01.2002 | 08.04.2002 |
| Маршалловы Острова (присоединение) | 16.10.1995 | 14.01.1996 |
| Мексика (присоединение) <2> | 13.05.1994 | 11.08.1994 |
| Мозамбик (присоединение) | 08.01.2003 | 08.04.2003 |
| Молдова (присоединение) <1> | 11.10.2005 | 09.01.2006 |
| Монако (присоединение) | 25.01.2002 | 25.04.2002 |
| Монголия (присоединение) | 22.11.2005 | 20.02.2006 |
| Мьянма (присоединение) | 19.09.2003 | 18.12.2003 |
| Намибия (присоединение) | 07.09.2005 | 06.12.2005 |
| Науру (присоединение) | 11.08.2005 | 09.11.2005 |
| Нигер (присоединение) | 30.08.2006 | 28.11.2006 |
| Нигерия (ратификация) | 18.06.2015 | 16.09.2015 |
| Нидерланды (принятие) <1>, <5> | 05.03.1992 | 03.06.1992 |
| Никарагуа (присоединение) | 04.07.2007 | 02.10.2007 |
| Ниуэ (присоединение) | 22.06.2009 | 20.09.2009 |
| Новая Зеландия (ратификация) | 10.06.1999 | 08.09.1999 |
| Норвегия (ратификация) | 18.04.1991 | 01.03.1992 |
| Объединенная Республика Танзания (присоединение) | 08.12.2016 | 08.03.2017 |
| Объединенные Арабские Эмираты (присоединение) <1> | 15.09.2005 | 14.12.2005 |
| Оман (присоединение) | 24.09.1990 | 01.03.1992 |
| Пакистан (присоединение) | 20.09.2000 | 19.12.2000 |
| Палау (присоединение) | 04.12.2001 | 04.03.2002 |
| Панама (присоединение) | 03.07.2002 | 01.10.2002 |
| Парагвай (присоединение) <2> | 12.11.2004 | 10.02.2005 |
| Перу (присоединение) | 19.07.2001 | 17.10.2001 |
| Польша (ратификация) | 25.06.1991 | 01.03.1992 |
| Португалия (присоединение) | 05.01.1996 | 04.04.1996 |
| Республика Корея (присоединение) | 10.06.2003 | 08.09.2003 |
| Российская Федерация (ратификация) | 04.05.2001 | 02.08.2001 |
| Румыния (присоединение) | 02.06.1993 | 31.08.1993 |
| Сальвадор (присоединение) | 07.12.2000 | 07.03.2001 |
| Сан-Марино (присоединение) | 15.12.2014 | 15.03.2015 |
| Сан-Томе и Принсипи (присоединение) | 05.05.2006 | 03.08.2006 |
| Саудовская Аравия (присоединение) | 02.02.2006 | 03.05.2006 |
| Северная Македония (присоединение) | 07.08.2007 | 05.11.2007 |
| Сейшельские Острова (ратификация) | 24.01.1989 | 01.03.1992 |
| Сенегал (присоединение) | 09.08.2004 | 07.11.2004 |
| Сент-Винсент и Гренадины (присоединение) | 09.10.2001 | 07.01.2002 |
| Сент-Люсия (присоединение) | 20.05.2004 | 18.08.2004 |
| Сербия (правопреемство) <7> | - | 03.06.2006 |
| Сингапур (присоединение) | 12.08.2015 | 10.11.2015 |
| Сирийская Арабская Республика (присоединение) | 24.03.2003 | 22.06.2003 |
| Словакия (присоединение) | 08.12.2000 | 08.03.2001 |
| Словения (присоединение) | 18.07.2003 | 16.10.2003 |
| Соединенное Королевство (ратификация) <1>, <4> | 03.05.1991 | 01.03.1992 |
| Соединенные Штаты (ратификация) | 06.12.1994 | 06.03.1995 |
| Судан (присоединение) | 22.05.2000 | 20.08.2000 |
| Таджикистан (присоединение) | 12.08.2005 | 10.11.2005 |
| Того (присоединение) | 10.03.2003 | 08.06.2003 |
| Тонга (присоединение) | 06.12.2002 | 06.03.2003 |
| Тринидад и Тобаго (присоединение) | 27.07.1989 | 01.03.1992 |
| Тунис (присоединение) | 06.03.1998 | 04.06.1998 |
| Туркменистан (присоединение) | 08.06.1999 | 06.09.1999 |
| Турция (ратификация) <1> | 06.03.1998 | 04.06.1998 |
| Узбекистан (присоединение) | 25.09.2000 | 24.12.2000 |
| Украина (ратификация) | 21.04.1994 | 20.07.1994 |
| Уругвай (присоединение) | 10.08.2001 | 08.11.2001 |
| Фиджи (присоединение) | 21.05.2008 | 19.08.2008 |
| Филиппины (ратификация) | 06.01.2004 | 05.04.2004 |
| Финляндия (присоединение) | 28.04.2000 | 27.07.2000 |
| Франция (одобрение) <1> | 02.12.1991 | 01.03.1992 |
| Хорватия (присоединение) | 18.08.2005 | 16.11.2005 |
| Черногория (правопреемство) <7> | - | 03.06.2006 |
| Чехия (присоединение) | 10.12.2004 | 10.03.2005 |
| Чили (ратификация) | 22.04.1994 | 21.07.1994 |
| Швейцария (ратификация) | 12.03.1993 | 10.06.1993 |
| Швеция (ратификация) | 13.09.1990 | 01.03.1992 |
| Эквадор (присоединение) | 10.03.2003 | 08.06.2003 |
| Экваториальная Гвинея (присоединение) | 15.01.2004 | 14.04.2004 |
| Эсватини <*> (присоединение) | 17.04.2003 | 16.07.2003 |
| Эстония (присоединение) | 28.01.2004 | 27.04.2004 |
| Южная Африка (присоединение) | 08.07.2005 | 06.10.2005 |
| Ямайка (присоединение) <2> | 19.08.2005 | 17.11.2005 |
| Япония (присоединение) | 24.04.1998 | 23.07.1998 |
Число государств-участников: 157
PROTOCOL FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF UNLAWFUL ACTS AGAINST THE SAFETY OF FIXED PLATFORMS LOCATED ON THE CONTINENTAL SHELF (SUA PROT)
Done at Rome, 10 March 1988
Entry into force: 1 March 1992
I. Signatories
<1> For the text of a reservation or statement, see section III.
II. Contracting States
| Number of Contracting States: | 157 |
|---|---|
| (the combined merchant fleets of which constitute approximately 94.84% of the gross tonnage of the world's merchant fleet |
<*> Former Swaziland (communication of change of name received in June 2018)
<1> For the text of a reservation, declaration or statement, see section III.
<2> With a notification under article 3, see section IV.
<3> On 3 October 1990 the German Democratic Republic acceded to the Federal Republic of Germany. The German Democratic Republic had acceded <*> to the Convention on 14 April 1989.
<*> For the text of a reservation, see section III.
<4> The United Kingdom declared its ratification to be effective also in respect of the Isle of Man from 8 February 1999 and in respect of Jersey from 17 October 2014.
<5> Applies to Aruba with effect from 17 January 2006. Also extended to Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba (the Caribbean part of the Netherlands) with effect from 10 October 2010. Since that date, the Kingdom of the Netherlands consists of four autonomous countries: The Netherlands (European part and Caribbean part), Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten. For more details see footnote 4, in section II of SOLAS 1974.
<6> China extended the Protocol to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region with effect from 20 February 2006, and to the Macao Special Administrative Region from 2 April 2020.
<7> Following the dissolution of the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro on 3 June 2006, all Treaty actions undertaken by Serbia and Montenegro continue to be in force with respect to Republic of Serbia. Montenegro has informed that it wished to succeed to this treaty with effect from the same date, i.e. 3 June 2006.
III. Declarations, Reservations and Statements
Brazil
The instrument of accession of the Federative Republic of Brazil contained the following reservation:
«...with reservation to article 6, paragraph 2; article 8' and article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention and to article 3, paragraph 2 of the Protocol.»
China
The following statement was made at the time of signature of the Protocol:
«The People's Republic of China shall not be bound by paragraph 1 of article 16 of the said Convention <1>.»
This statement was reaffirmed in the instrument of ratification of the People's Republic of China.
Cuba
The instrument of accession of the Republic of Cuba contained the following reservation:
«The Republic of Cuba, in accordance with paragraph 2 of article 16 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, applicable to the present Protocol, declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 1 of the aforesaid article, with respect to the settlement of disputes between States Parties, since it consider that such disputes should be settled by amicable agreement. Similarly, the Republic of Cuba reiterates that it does not recognize the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.»
Denmark
The instrument of ratification of the Kingdom of Denmark contained the following reservation:
«...with the qualification, however, that the Convention as well as the Protocol will not apply to the Faroes nor to Greenland, pending a further decision.»
Egypt
The instrument of ratification of the Arab Republic of Egypt was accompanied by the following reservations:
«1 A reservation is made to article 16 on the peaceful settlement of disputes because it provides for the binding jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, and also with regard to the application of the Convention to seagoing ships in internal waters which are scheduled to navigate beyond territorial waters.»
2 A reservation is made to article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention and article 3, paragraph 2, of the Protocol because those articles permit the optional jurisdiction of blackmailed States (which are asked by the perpetrator of an act of terrorism to do or abstain from doing any act).
This is in compliance with the provision of paragraph 4 of each of the two articles.»
France
The instrument of approval of the French Republic contained the following declarations:
«1. As far as article 2, paragraph 2, is concerned the French Republic understands by „tentative“, „incitation“, "complicité" and „menace“, la tenative, l'incitation, la complicité and la menace as defined in the conditions envisaged by French criminal law.»
2. The French Republic does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 1, paragraph 1, to the extent that reference is made to the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1, according to which: «Any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention which cannot be settled through negotiation within a reasonable time shall, at the request of one of them, be submitted to arbitration. If, within six months from the date of the request for arbitration, the parties are unable to agree on the organization of the arbitration any one of those parties may refer the dispute to the International Court of Justice by request in conformity with the Statute of the Court».»
German Democratic Republic
The instrument of accession of the German Democratic Republic was accompanied by the following reservation in the German language:
«In accordance with article 16, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, the provisions of which shall also apply mutatis mutandis to the Protocol according to article 1, paragraph 1, of the Protocol, the German Democratic Republic declares that it does not consider itself bound by article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention as regards the Protocol.»
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
The instrument of accession by the Islamic Republic of Iran contained the following reservations:
«Pursuant to Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran affirms that the consent of all parties to such a dispute is necessary in each individual case, for the submission of the dispute to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran can, if it deems appropriate, agree with the submission of the dispute to arbitration in accordance with the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran and related domestic Law.»
With regard to Article 11, paragraph 4, the Islamic Republic of Iran considers that the extradition would be applicable only to the State Party within the territorial jurisdiction of which the crime has occurred. In the case where an extradition agreement exists between the requesting State and the State in which the crime has occurred, the agreement shall be applied.»
Iraq
The following reservation was made at the time of signature of the Protocol:
«This signature does not in any way imply recognition of Israel or entry into any relationship with it.»
Israel
The instrument of ratification by Israel contained the following reservation:
«Pursuant to Article 1, paragraph 1 of the Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, the provisions of article 16 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the Protocol. Accordingly, the Government of the State of Israel declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention with regard to the Protocol.»
The instrument of ratification by Israel also contained the following statement:
«The Government of the State of Israel has noted that the reservation made upon the signature of Iraq of the aforementioned Convention contains a statement with respect to the State of Israel.»
The Government of the State of Israel considers that such a statement, which is explicitly of a political nature, is incompatible with the purposes and objectives of the Convention.
The Government of the State of Israel, therefore, objects to the aforesaid statement made by Iraq.»
Mexico
The instrument of accession of the United Mexican States contained the following reservation:
«Mexico's accession to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 1988, and to its Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, 1988, is on the understanding that in matters relating to extradition, both article 11 of the Convention and article 3 of the Protocol will be applied in the Republic of Mexico subject to the modalities and procedures laid down in the applicable provisions of national law.»
Moldova
The instrument of accession of the Republic of Moldova contained the following declaration:
«Until the full re-establishment of the territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova, the provisions of the Protocol shall be applied only on the territory controlled by the authorities of the Republic of Moldova.»
The Republic of Moldova declares that it shall establish its own jurisdiction over the offences specified in article 2 of the Protocol, in cases provided in article 3, paragraph 2 of this Protocol.»
Netherlands
The instrument of acceptance of the Kingdom of the Netherlands contained the following reservation:
«With regard to the obligation laid down in article 1 of the Protocol in conjunction with article 10 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation to exercise jurisdiction in cases where the judicial authorities of the Netherlands cannot exercise jurisdiction on any of the grounds referred to in article 3, paragraph 1, of the Protocol, the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands reserves the right to be bound to exercise such jurisdiction only after the Kingdom has received and rejected a request for extradition from a State Party».
The depositary received a communication on 29 September 2010 from the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands informing of the withdrawal of the above reservation as follows:
«With regard to the obligation laid down in article 1 of the Protocol in conjunction with article 10 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation to exercise jurisdiction in cases where the judicial authorities of the Netherlands cannot exercise jurisdiction on any of the grounds referred to in article 3, paragraph 1, of the Protocol, the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands reserves the right to be bound to exercise such jurisdiction only after the Kingdom has received and rejected a request for extradition from a State Party.»
Singapore
The instrument of accession included the following reservation and declaration:
«Pursuant to article 1, paragraph 1 of the Protocol, the provisions of article 16 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Act against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (hereinafter referred to as the „Convention“) shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the Protocol. Accordingly, pursuant to article 16, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Republic of Singapore declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention in its application to the Protocol.»
«The Republic of Singapore understands article 10 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Act against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, whether as applied to the offences under the Protocol or otherwise, to include the right of competent authorities to decide not to submit any particular case for prosecution before the judicial authorities if the alleged offender is dealt with under the national security and preventive detention laws.»
Turkiye
The instrument of ratification of the Republic of Turkiye was accompanied by the following reservation:
«In signing „the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation“ and „the Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms located on the Continental Shelf“, the Government of the Republic of Turkiye, under the article 16(2) of the said Convention declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph (1) of the article 16 of the said Convention.»
United Arab Emirates
The instrument of accession of the United Arab Emirates contained the following reservation:
«The Government of the United Arab Emirates has taken cognizance of the provisions of the aforementioned Convention and Protocol and accedes to them with full reservation in respect of the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention concerning the settlement of a dispute between States Parties to the Convention by arbitration or, if they are unable to agree on the organization of arbitration, by referral of the dispute to the International Court of Justice. It also enters a full reservation with respect to the provisions of article 1 of the Protocol insofar as they refer to article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation.»
Attesting to this, I, Rashid Abdullah Al-Nuaimi, Foreign Minister of the United Arab Emirates, have signed this document on behalf of the Government of the United Arab Emirates and ordered that the official seal of the Foreign Ministry be affixed to it.»
United Kingdom
The instrument of ratification of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was accompanied by the following declaration:
«...that until consultations with various territories under the territorial sovereignty of the United Kingdom are completed, the Convention and Protocol will apply in respect of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland only. Consultations with the territories are in hand and are expected to be completed by the end of 1991.»
IV. Notifications
Article 3
Canada
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 2 of the Protocol, the Secretary-General has been informed that Canada has established jurisdiction over offences in all of the cases cited in Article 3, paragraph 2 of the Protocol.
Article 3
Jamaica
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 2 of the Protocol, the Secretary-General has been informed that Jamaica has established its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in Article 2.
Article 3
Paraguay
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 2 of the Protocol, the Secretary-General has been informed that the Republic of Paraguay has established its jurisdiction in accordance with Article 3, paragraph 2 of the Protocol.